• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量极端原型:量表的编制与验证。

Measuring extremist archetypes: Scale development and validation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Center for Research of Extremism, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0270225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270225. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0270225
PMID:35857719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9299337/
Abstract

Previous work has often disregarded the psychological heterogeneity of violent extremists. This research aimed to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the psychological diversity of violent extremists. Based on qualitative work, we developed and validated the Extremist Archetypes Scale, identifying five distinct archetype dimensions: "adventurer," "fellow traveler," "leader," "drifter" and "misfit." Study 1 identified five dimensions among White majority members (N = 307), four of which were related to extremist violent intentions and which dissociated in terms of sociopolitical ideologies and intergroup attitudes. Preregistered Study 2 (N = 308) confirmed the scale's five-factor solution in another sample of White majority members, replicated relationships with violent intentions, and demonstrated the dimensions' distinct personality correlates. As in Study 1, the archetype dimensions had positive associations with extremist violent intentions and tapped onto different psychological profiles in terms of major personality traits. Study 3 (N = 317) replicated these results in a sample of Muslim minority members. Measurement equivalence was established across gender, age, political orientation, and ethnicity (majority and minority).

摘要

先前的研究往往忽视了暴力极端分子的心理异质性。本研究旨在更细致地了解暴力极端分子的心理多样性。基于定性研究,我们开发并验证了极端主义原型量表,确定了五个不同的原型维度:“冒险家”、“同行者”、“领导者”、“流浪者”和“不合群者”。研究 1 在白人多数群体(N=307)中确定了五个维度,其中四个与极端暴力意图有关,并在社会政治意识形态和群体间态度方面有所区分。预先注册的研究 2(N=308)在另一个白人多数群体样本中验证了量表的五因素解决方案,复制了与暴力意图的关系,并展示了维度的独特人格相关性。与研究 1 一样,原型维度与极端暴力意图呈正相关,并在主要人格特质方面反映出不同的心理特征。研究 3(N=317)在穆斯林少数群体样本中复制了这些结果。在性别、年龄、政治取向和种族(多数和少数)方面建立了测量等效性。

相似文献

1
Measuring extremist archetypes: Scale development and validation.测量极端原型:量表的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0270225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270225. eCollection 2022.
2
The prevalence of middle eastern extremist ideologies among some canadian offenders.一些加拿大罪犯中存在的中东极端主义思想的流行程度。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 May;25(5):919-28. doi: 10.1177/0886260509336966. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
3
Is Extreme in the Eye of the Beholder? An Experimental Assessment of Extremist Cognitions.极端在旁观者的眼中?对极端认知的实验评估。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4865-NP4888. doi: 10.1177/0886260520958645. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
Identifying and changing the normative beliefs about aggression which lead young Muslim adults to join extremist anti-Semitic groups in Pakistan.识别并改变那些导致巴基斯坦年轻穆斯林成年人加入极端反犹组织的关于攻击性的规范性信念。
Aggress Behav. 2009 Nov-Dec;35(6):514-9. doi: 10.1002/ab.20325.
5
Police programmes that seek to increase community connectedness for reducing violent extremism behaviour, attitudes and beliefs.旨在增强社区联系以减少暴力极端主义行为、态度和信仰的警方项目。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;16(3):e1111. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1111. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Cultural threat perceptions predict violent extremism via need for cognitive closure.文化威胁认知通过认知封闭需求预测暴力极端主义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2213874120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213874120. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Irrational Beliefs and Personality Traits as Psychological Mechanisms Underlying the Adolescents' Extremist Mind-Set.非理性信念和人格特质作为青少年极端主义思维模式背后的心理机制
Front Psychol. 2019 May 22;10:1184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01184. eCollection 2019.
8
Exploring the Nexus: Personality Disorders and Their Impact on Violent Extremism, Radicalism, and Activism.探索关联:人格障碍及其对暴力极端主义、激进主义和激进行动的影响。
J Pers Disord. 2024 Aug;38(4):350-367. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.350.
9
A comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and the world.美国及世界范围内左翼、右翼和伊斯兰极端分子的政治暴力比较。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2122593119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122593119. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
10
Distinct patterns of incidental exposure to and active selection of radicalizing information indicate varying levels of support for violent extremism.不同的偶然接触和主动选择激进化信息的模式表明对暴力极端主义的支持程度不同。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0293810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293810. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Measuring Extremist Archetypes: Scale Development and Validation.更正:测量极端主义原型:量表的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 18;18(12):e0296237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296237. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The personality of violent Jihadists: Examining violent and nonviolent defense of Muslims.暴力圣战者的人格:考察穆斯林的暴力和非暴力防御。
J Pers. 2024 Aug;92(4):1172-1192. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12880. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
Understanding violent extremism in the 21st century: the (re)emerging role of relative deprivation.理解 21 世纪的暴力极端主义:相对剥夺的(再)出现作用。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right.极右翼群体的心理特征。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):90-116. doi: 10.1177/1745691619868208. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
4
Who is more violent in extremist groups? A comparison of leaders and followers.极端组织中谁更暴力?领导者与追随者的比较。
Aggress Behav. 2020 Mar;46(2):141-150. doi: 10.1002/ab.21865. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
Fusion with political leaders predicts willingness to persecute immigrants and political opponents.与政治领导人融合预示着愿意迫害移民和政治对手。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Nov;3(11):1180-1189. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0708-1. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
The HEXACO-100 Across 16 Languages: A Large-Scale Test of Measurement Invariance.HEXACO-100 跨 16 种语言:大规模测量不变性检验。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Sep-Oct;102(5):714-726. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1614011. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
Group-Based Relative Deprivation Explains Endorsement of Extremism Among Western-Born Muslims.群体本位相对剥夺感解释了西方出生的穆斯林对极端主义的支持。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Apr;30(4):596-605. doi: 10.1177/0956797619834879. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
Survey Satisficing Inflates Reliability and Validity Measures: An Experimental Comparison of College and Amazon Mechanical Turk Samples.调查满意度会夸大信度和效度测量结果:对大学生样本和亚马逊土耳其机器人样本的实验比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Dec;76(6):912-932. doi: 10.1177/0013164415627349. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
9
The impact of dark tetrad traits on political orientation and extremism: an analysis in the course of a presidential election.黑暗人格四分体特质对政治取向和极端主义的影响:一项在总统选举过程中的分析
Heliyon. 2017 Oct 10;3(10):e00425. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00425. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization.走向极端主义:意义丧失引起的封闭性需求会促使激进化的现场和实验证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):270-285. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000111. Epub 2017 Sep 4.