• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020 年夏天的种族正义运动中的交叉性问题。

Intersectionality within the racial justice movement in the summer of 2020.

机构信息

University of Maryland at College Park College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, College Park, MD 20742.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2118525119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118525119. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2118525119
PMID:35858404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9335322/
Abstract

In an environment that is high in racial justice saliency, how do identities inform motivation for supporting specific issues in the crowd? This study examines the role that intersectionality played in mobilizing participants to join the mass demonstrations sparked by the murder of George Floyd. Building on recent studies that show how protest participants connect issue-based concerns with their identities to boost support for movements, we analyze data collected through surveys with a random sample of activists participating in the protests after George Floyd's death in Washington, DC, in 2020. We find that intersectional motivations played a significant role in mobilizing protest participants. Analysis of these factors helps explain the diversity of the crowd and provides insights into how the movement may contribute to greater success for racial justice and the degree to which the movement has staying power.

摘要

在一个种族正义凸显度高的环境中,身份如何影响人们支持群体中特定问题的动机?本研究考察了交叉性在动员参与者加入由乔治·弗洛伊德谋杀案引发的大规模示威中的作用。本研究建立在最近的研究基础上,这些研究表明,抗议参与者如何将基于问题的关注点与他们的身份联系起来,以增强对运动的支持,我们通过对 2020 年在华盛顿特区乔治·弗洛伊德去世后参加抗议活动的随机样本活动人士进行调查,分析了收集到的数据。我们发现,交叉性动机在动员抗议参与者方面发挥了重要作用。对这些因素的分析有助于解释人群的多样性,并深入了解运动如何为种族正义带来更大的成功,以及运动的持久力程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08fc/9335322/09ffde271ef8/pnas.2118525119fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08fc/9335322/6c99a9b9562a/pnas.2118525119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08fc/9335322/09ffde271ef8/pnas.2118525119fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08fc/9335322/6c99a9b9562a/pnas.2118525119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08fc/9335322/09ffde271ef8/pnas.2118525119fig02.jpg

相似文献

1
Intersectionality within the racial justice movement in the summer of 2020.2020 年夏天的种族正义运动中的交叉性问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2118525119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118525119. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
2
Toward a moral reckoning on structural racism: Examining structural factors, encouraging structural thinking, and supporting structural intervention.走向对结构性种族主义的道德审视:审视结构性因素、鼓励结构性思维并支持结构性干预。
Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Mar;71(1-2):33-42. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12642. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
The Fight to Dismantle Systemic Racism and for Racial Justice in Delaware As Seen Through the Eyes of the Delaware Racial Justice Collaborative.从特拉华州种族正义协作组织的视角看,在特拉华州消除系统性种族主义和争取种族正义的斗争。
Dela J Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;8(4):16-18. doi: 10.32481/djph.2022.10.005. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Do Health Care Organizations Have Legitimate Responsibilities beyond the Delivery of Health Care? Insights from Citizenship Theory.医疗保健组织除了提供医疗保健服务之外还有其他正当的责任吗?从公民身份理论中得到的启示。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jul;52(4):6-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.1403.
5
Intersectionality takes it to the streets: Mobilizing across diverse interests for the Women's March.交叉性运动走向街头:为妇女大游行动员不同利益群体。
Sci Adv. 2017 Sep 20;3(9):eaao1390. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao1390. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
Failure of leadership in U.S. academic medicine after George Floyd's killing by police and amidst subsequent unrest.美国警察杀害乔治·弗洛伊德以及随后的骚乱之后,美国学术界医学领导力的失败。
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;65:116-119. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.018. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Say their names: Resurgence in the collective attention toward Black victims of fatal police violence following the death of George Floyd.请说出他们的名字:在乔治·弗洛伊德去世后,针对黑人死于警察暴力的集体关注再次出现。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):e0279225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279225. eCollection 2023.
8
We've been here before: Reactions to the murder of George Floyd and subsequent protests for justice.我们以前经历过这种情况:对乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀事件以及随后为正义而进行的抗议活动的反应。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2024 Apr 18. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000670.
9
From colorblind to systemic racism: Emergence of a rhetorical shift in higher education discourse in response to the murder of George Floyd.从色盲到系统性种族主义:回应乔治·弗洛伊德之死,高等教育话语中出现修辞转变。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289545. eCollection 2023.
10
Humanizing racialization: Social psychology in a time of unexpected transformational conjunctions.人性化种族化:意外变革性结合时期的社会心理学。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;61(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12517. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Terminology and Definitions of Racial Health Equity in Prominent Health Websites: Systematic Review.知名健康网站中种族健康公平的术语和定义:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 23;27:e64868. doi: 10.2196/64868.
2
Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy.科学倡导多元化和增强的途径。
Sci Adv. 2023 May 19;9(20):eabq4899. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq4899.

本文引用的文献

1
Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland.大流行的脆弱性:COVID-19 正在暴露和加剧美国心脏地带的不平等现象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020685118.
2
US racial inequality may be as deadly as COVID-19.美国的种族不平等可能像新冠病毒一样致命。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):21854-21856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014750117. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
The science of contemporary street protest: New efforts in the United States.当代街头抗议的科学:美国的新努力。
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 23;5(10):eaaw5461. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5461. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Intersectionality takes it to the streets: Mobilizing across diverse interests for the Women's March.交叉性运动走向街头:为妇女大游行动员不同利益群体。
Sci Adv. 2017 Sep 20;3(9):eaao1390. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao1390. eCollection 2017 Sep.
5
Issue bricolage: explaining the configuration of the social movement sector, 1960-1995.拼凑问题:解释1960年至1995年社会运动部门的结构
AJS. 2014 Jul;120(1):187-225. doi: 10.1086/677196.