School of Social Work, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Department of Sociology and Faculty of Computing & Data Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289545. eCollection 2023.
We use topic modeling and exponential random graph models (ERGM) to analyze statements issued by Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) (N = 356) in the United States in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder in May 2020. Prior research investigating discourse on race in IHEs demonstrates the prevalence of two paradigms. First, the ideology of 'colorblind racism' treats systemic racism-a form of racism where social, political, and economic institutions are organized in a way that disadvantages people of color-as having largely existed in the past. Consistent with this, IHE responses to prior race-related incidents on campus have emphasized individual prejudice, avoiding discussion of systemic racism. Second, 'diversity' orthodoxy, which treats race as a cultural identity and emphasizes the instrumental benefits of racial heterogeneity on campus, is commonplace in IHEs. Topic modeling of statements issued in 2020 reveals the prevalence of several themes including the systemic and enduring nature of racism in the United States, diversity orthodoxy, humanist responses reflecting rhetoric consistent with colorblind racism, and COVID-19 response strategies. ERGM reveals fragmentation in the discourse based on IHE attributes. Religiously affiliated IHEs and those located in Republican-voting states attend more to diversity and humanist discourse, and less to systemic racism. Elite IHEs, those in Democrat-voting states, and IHEs with high percentages of Black students are more focused on systemic racism. Overall, as compared to colorblind racism and diversity orthodoxy established in prior work, our analysis reveals two striking rhetorical shifts on race discourse in IHEs in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder: (1) from a colorblind ideology to discussing the systemic nature of racism in the United States, and (2) from acknowledging perpetrators but not the broader context of racism in on-campus incidents to acknowledging diffuse racism manifest in society but refraining from explicitly naming any wrongdoers.
我们使用主题建模和指数随机图模型(ERGM)来分析 2020 年 5 月乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后,美国高等教育机构(IHEs)发表的声明(N=356)。先前研究种族问题的研究表明,IHEs 中的话语存在两种范式。首先,“色盲种族主义”的意识形态将系统性种族主义——一种社会、政治和经济制度以不利于有色人种的方式组织的形式——视为过去主要存在的问题。与此一致,IHE 对校园内先前与种族有关的事件的回应强调了个人偏见,避免讨论系统性种族主义。其次,“多样性”正统观念将种族视为一种文化身份,并强调校园内种族异质性的工具性好处,这在 IHE 中很常见。2020 年发表的声明主题建模揭示了几个主题的流行,包括美国种族主义的系统性和持久性、多样性正统观念、反映与色盲种族主义一致的修辞的人文主义回应,以及 COVID-19 应对策略。ERGM 揭示了基于 IHE 属性的话语碎片化。宗教附属的 IHE 和位于共和党投票州的 IHE 更关注多样性和人文主义话语,而较少关注系统性种族主义。精英 IHE、民主投票州的 IHE 和黑人学生比例较高的 IHE 更关注系统性种族主义。总体而言,与先前研究中确立的色盲种族主义和多样性正统观念相比,我们的分析揭示了乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后 IHE 种族话语的两个引人注目的修辞转变:(1)从色盲意识形态转向讨论美国种族主义的系统性,(2)从承认肇事者但不承认校园事件中种族主义的更广泛背景,到承认弥漫在社会中的弥散性种族主义,但避免明确点名任何肇事者。