The Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e068946. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068946.
To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers.
Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England.
Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant was dominant.
317 341 health and social care workers vaccinated between 4 January and 28 February 2021, registered with a general practice using the TPP SystmOne clinical information system in England, and not clinically extremely vulnerable.
Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 administered as part of the national covid-19 vaccine roll-out.
Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, or covid-19 related attendance at an accident and emergency (A&E) department or hospital admission occurring within 20 weeks of receipt of the first vaccine dose.
Over the duration of 118 771 person-years of follow-up there were 6962 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, 282 covid-19 related A&E attendances, and 166 covid-19 related hospital admissions. The cumulative incidence of each outcome was similar for both vaccines during the first 20 weeks after vaccination. The cumulative incidence of recorded SARS-CoV-2 infection 20 weeks after first-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 was 21.7 per 1000 people (95% confidence interval 20.9 to 22.4) and with ChAdOx1 was 23.7 (21.8 to 25.6), representing a difference of 2.04 per 1000 people (0.04 to 4.04). The difference in the cumulative incidence per 1000 people of covid-19 related A&E attendance at 20 weeks was 0.06 per 1000 people (95% CI -0.31 to 0.43). For covid-19 related hospital admission, this difference was 0.11 per 1000 people (-0.22 to 0.44).
In this cohort of healthcare workers where we would not anticipate vaccine type to be related to health status, we found no substantial differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease up to 20 weeks after vaccination. Incidence dropped sharply at 3-4 weeks after vaccination, and there were few covid-19 related hospital attendance and admission events after this period. This is in line with expected onset of vaccine induced immunity and suggests strong protection against Alpha variant covid-19 disease for both vaccines in this relatively young and healthy population of healthcare workers.
比较 BNT162b2 mRNA(辉瑞-生物科技)和 ChAdOx1(牛津-阿斯利康)新冠疫苗在卫生和社会保健工作者中预防感染和新冠疾病的效果。
以英格兰国民保健署(NHS England)的名义,代表开展了一项模仿比较有效性试验的队列研究。
利用 OpenSAFELY-TPP 研究平台中的初级保健、医院和新冠监测记录进行关联,该平台涵盖了 SARS-CoV-2 Alpha 变体占主导地位的时期。
2021 年 1 月 4 日至 2 月 28 日期间,在英格兰使用 TPP SystmOne 临床信息系统注册的 317341 名卫生和社会保健工作者,未被临床认定为极度脆弱。
接种 BNT162b2 或 ChAdOx1 疫苗,接种作为国家新冠疫苗接种计划的一部分。
在首次接种疫苗后 20 周内记录的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性检测、或与新冠相关的在急诊部(A&E)就诊或住院。
在 118771 人年的随访期间,有 6962 例 SARS-CoV-2 阳性检测,282 例与新冠相关的 A&E 就诊,166 例与新冠相关的住院。接种疫苗后 20 周内,两种疫苗的每种结局的累积发病率均相似。接种 BNT162b2 后 20 周时,首次接种疫苗后记录的 SARS-CoV-2 感染累积发病率为每 1000 人 21.7(95%置信区间 20.9 至 22.4),接种 ChAdOx1 后为 23.7(21.8 至 25.6),每 1000 人差异为 2.04(0.04 至 4.04)。接种后 20 周时,与新冠相关的 A&E 就诊累积发病率每 1000 人差异为 0.06(95%CI -0.31 至 0.43)。对于新冠相关的住院治疗,这一差异为每 1000 人 0.11(95%CI -0.22 至 0.44)。
在本队列中,我们预计疫苗类型与健康状况无关,我们发现接种疫苗后 20 周内,SARS-CoV-2 感染或新冠疾病的发病率没有实质性差异。接种疫苗后 3-4 周内发病率急剧下降,此后很少有与新冠相关的住院就诊和入院事件。这与预期的疫苗诱导免疫的发作相符,表明在这一相对年轻和健康的医护人员人群中,这两种疫苗对 Alpha 变体新冠疾病均有很强的保护作用。