• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第二剂接种后 6 个月以上 BNT162b2 和 ChAdOx1 新冠疫苗效力下降:使用电子健康记录链接的 OpenSAFELY 队列研究。

Waning effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 covid-19 vaccines over six months since second dose: OpenSAFELY cohort study using linked electronic health records.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e071249. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071249.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2022-071249
PMID:35858698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10441183/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate waning of covid-19 vaccine effectiveness over six months after second dose.

DESIGN

Cohort study, approved by NHS England.

SETTING

Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 records within the OpenSAFELY-TPP database.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible, excluding care home residents and healthcare professionals.

EXPOSURES

People who had received two doses of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 (administered during the national vaccine rollout) were compared with unvaccinated people during six consecutive comparison periods, each of four weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adjusted hazard ratios for covid-19 related hospital admission, covid-19 related death, positive SARS-CoV-2 test, and non-covid-19 related death comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated people. Waning vaccine effectiveness was quantified as ratios of adjusted hazard ratios per four week period, separately for subgroups aged ≥65 years, 18-64 years and clinically vulnerable, 40-64 years, and 18-39 years.

RESULTS

1 951 866 and 3 219 349 eligible adults received two doses of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1, respectively, and 2 422 980 remained unvaccinated. Waning of vaccine effectiveness was estimated to be similar across outcomes and vaccine brands. In the ≥65 years subgroup, ratios of adjusted hazard ratios for covid-19 related hospital admission, covid-19 related death, and positive SARS-CoV-2 test ranged from 1.19 (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.24)to 1.34 (1.09 to 1.64) per four weeks. Despite waning vaccine effectiveness, rates of covid-19 related hospital admission and death were substantially lower among vaccinated than unvaccinated adults up to 26 weeks after the second dose, with estimated vaccine effectiveness ≥80% for BNT162b2, and ≥75% for ChAdOx1. By weeks 23-26, rates of positive SARS-CoV-2 test in vaccinated people were similar to or higher than in unvaccinated people (adjusted hazard ratios up to 1.72 (1.11 to 2.68) for BNT162b2 and 1.86 (1.79 to 1.93) for ChAdOx1).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate at which estimated vaccine effectiveness waned was consistent for covid-19 related hospital admission, covid-19 related death, and positive SARS-CoV-2 test and was similar across subgroups defined by age and clinical vulnerability. If sustained to outcomes of infection with the omicron variant and to booster vaccination, these findings will facilitate scheduling of booster vaccination.

摘要

目的

估计第二剂疫苗接种后 6 个月内 COVID-19 疫苗效力的衰减情况。

设计

在 NHS England 批准下进行的队列研究。

地点

OpenSAFELY-TPP 数据库中的初级保健、医院和 COVID-19 记录的链接。

参与者

没有 SARS-CoV-2 既往感染史的成年人有资格参加,不包括养老院居民和医护人员。

暴露情况

在连续的 6 个比较期内,每 4 周比较一次接受两剂 BNT162b2 或 ChAdOx1(在国家疫苗接种计划期间接种)的人群与未接种疫苗的人群。

主要结局指标

比较接种疫苗和未接种疫苗人群的 COVID-19 相关住院、COVID-19 相关死亡、SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性和非 COVID-19 相关死亡的校正危险比。通过每个 4 周的时间间隔,分别为年龄≥65 岁、18-64 岁和临床脆弱人群、40-64 岁和 18-39 岁的亚组,量化疫苗效力的衰减。

结果

分别有 1951866 名和 3219349 名符合条件的成年人接受了两剂 BNT162b2 和 ChAdOx1,2422980 人未接种疫苗。在所有结局和疫苗品牌中,疫苗效力的衰减估计相似。在≥65 岁亚组中,COVID-19 相关住院、COVID-19 相关死亡和 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性的校正危险比比值范围为每 4 周 1.19(95%置信区间 1.14 至 1.24)至 1.34(1.09 至 1.64)。尽管疫苗效力下降,但在第二剂疫苗接种后 26 周内,接种疫苗的成年人 COVID-19 相关住院和死亡的发生率明显低于未接种疫苗的成年人,BNT162b2 的疫苗有效性估计≥80%,ChAdOx1 的疫苗有效性估计≥75%。在第 23-26 周,接种疫苗者的 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性率与未接种疫苗者相似或更高(BNT162b2 高达 1.72(1.11 至 2.68),ChAdOx1 高达 1.86(1.79 至 1.93))。

结论

COVID-19 相关住院、COVID-19 相关死亡和 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性的估计疫苗效力衰减率是一致的,并且在按年龄和临床脆弱性定义的亚组中相似。如果这种情况持续到感染奥密克戎变异株和加强针接种的结果,这些发现将有助于安排加强针接种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/10441183/085c40b9e2ba/hore071249.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/10441183/61d1c03e7d50/hore071249.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/10441183/5872c7ebda9a/hore071249.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/10441183/085c40b9e2ba/hore071249.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/10441183/61d1c03e7d50/hore071249.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/10441183/5872c7ebda9a/hore071249.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/10441183/085c40b9e2ba/hore071249.f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Waning effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 covid-19 vaccines over six months since second dose: OpenSAFELY cohort study using linked electronic health records.第二剂接种后 6 个月以上 BNT162b2 和 ChAdOx1 新冠疫苗效力下降:使用电子健康记录链接的 OpenSAFELY 队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e071249. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071249.
2
Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP.BNT162b2 与 mRNA-1273 新冠病毒疫苗加强针在英格兰的疗效比较:OpenSAFELY-TPP 的匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 15;380:e072808. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072808.
3
Vaccine effectiveness of the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 against SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of long-term care facilities in England (VIVALDI): a prospective cohort study.英格兰长期护理机构居民中 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 与 BNT162b2 疫苗首针接种对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的疫苗有效性(VIVALDI):一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1529-1538. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00289-9. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY.英格兰卫生和社会保健工作者中 ChAdOx1 与 BNT162b2 新冠疫苗的有效性比较:使用 OpenSAFELY 的队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e068946. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068946.
5
Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study.新冠病毒疫苗接种后和 SARS-CoV-2 阳性检测后的血小板减少症和血栓栓塞风险:自身对照病例系列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Aug 26;374:n1931. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1931.
6
Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study.辉瑞-生物科技疫苗和牛津-阿斯利康疫苗对英格兰老年人新冠病毒相关症状、住院及死亡率的有效性:检测阴性病例对照研究
BMJ. 2021 May 13;373:n1088. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1088.
7
COVID-19 vaccine waning and effectiveness and side-effects of boosters: a prospective community study from the ZOE COVID Study.COVID-19 疫苗效力下降和加强针的有效性和副作用:来自 ZOE COVID 研究的一项前瞻性社区研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;22(7):1002-1010. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00146-3. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Association of COVID-19 vaccines ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 with major venous, arterial, or thrombocytopenic events: A population-based cohort study of 46 million adults in England.COVID-19 疫苗 ChAdOx1 和 BNT162b2 与主要静脉、动脉或血小板减少性事件的关联:一项基于英格兰 4600 万成年人的基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 22;19(2):e1003926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003926. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 vaccination at preventing hospitalisations in people aged at least 80 years: a test-negative, case-control study.辉瑞-BioNTech 和牛津-阿斯利康 COVID-19 疫苗对预防 80 岁及以上人群住院的有效性:一项基于病例对照研究的无效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1539-1548. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00330-3. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
10
Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against COVID-19.BNT162b2 与 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 疫苗对 COVID-19 的疗效比较。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 28;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02795-w.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 vaccination, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for cancer: 30-month cohort study in an Italian province.2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种、全因死亡率和癌症住院情况:意大利某省的30个月队列研究
EXCLI J. 2025 Jul 1;24:690-707. doi: 10.17179/excli2025-8400. eCollection 2025.
2
Sustained natural immunity following SARS-CoV-2 infection against severe COVID-19 outcomes and symptomatic reinfection: analyses of national data for Brazil and Scotland.SARS-CoV-2感染后针对严重COVID-19结局和有症状再感染的持续自然免疫:巴西和苏格兰的国家数据分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e104057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104057.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Testing behaviour may bias observational studies of vaccine effectiveness.测试行为可能会使疫苗有效性的观察性研究产生偏差。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2022 Sep 27;7(3):242-246. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2022-0002. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Two-Dose Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine Effectiveness With Mixed Schedules and Extended Dosing Intervals: Test-Negative Design Studies From British Columbia and Quebec, Canada.两剂严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 疫苗有效性与混合时间表和延长剂量间隔:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省和魁北克省的阴性测试设计研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 30;75(11):1980-1992. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac290.
3
Comparative duration of neutralizing responses and protections of COVID-19 vaccination and correlates of protection.
新冠疫苗中和抗体反应和保护作用的比较持续时间以及保护相关因素。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 22;16(1):4748. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60024-9.
4
Comparative effectiveness of monovalent XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccines in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden: target trial emulation based on registry data.丹麦、芬兰和瑞典含单价XBB.1.5的新冠mRNA疫苗的比较有效性:基于登记数据的目标试验模拟
BMJ Med. 2024 Nov 17;3(1):e001074. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001074. eCollection 2024.
5
Mechanistic models of humoral kinetics following COVID-19 vaccination.新冠疫苗接种后体液动力学的机制模型。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 Jan;22(222):20240445. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0445. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
6
Methodology of comparative studies on the relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review.新冠病毒疫苗相对有效性的比较研究方法:一项系统评价
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2024 Oct;15(5):395-408. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2024.0063. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
7
Quantifying and Adjusting for Confounding From Health-Seeking Behavior and Health Care Access in Observational Research.在观察性研究中对因寻求医疗行为和医疗保健可及性导致的混杂因素进行量化与调整。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 23;11(10):ofae598. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae598. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Cohort study of cardiovascular safety of different COVID-19 vaccination doses among 46 million adults in England.英格兰 4600 万成年人中不同剂量 COVID-19 疫苗接种的心血管安全性队列研究。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 31;15(1):6085. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49634-x.
9
Safety, Immunogenicity, and Effectiveness of Chinese-Made COVID-19 Vaccines in the Real World: An Interim Report of a Living Systematic Review.国产新冠疫苗在现实世界中的安全性、免疫原性和有效性:一项动态系统评价的中期报告
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 16;12(7):781. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12070781.
10
Incidence of diabetes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in England and the implications of COVID-19 vaccination: a retrospective cohort study of 16 million people.英格兰地区 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间感染 SARS-CoV-2 后发生糖尿病的发病率:一项涉及 1600 万人的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Aug;12(8):558-568. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00159-1.
Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid-19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study.
美国奥密克戎、德尔塔和阿尔法 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的 mRNA 疫苗对新冠病毒的临床严重程度和有效性:前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ. 2022 Mar 9;376:e069761. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069761.
4
Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression.疫苗预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)感染和 COVID-19 疾病有效性的持续时间:系统评价和荟萃回归的结果。
Lancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):924-944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants.mRNA-1273 对 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎和德尔塔变异株的有效性。
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1063-1071. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01753-y. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
6
Risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden.第二剂 COVID-19 疫苗接种后 9 个月内的感染、住院和死亡风险:瑞典的一项回顾性、全人群队列研究。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):814-823. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00089-7. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Identifying and Alleviating Bias Due to Differential Depletion of Susceptible People in Postmarketing Evaluations of COVID-19 Vaccines.识别和减轻 COVID-19 疫苗上市后评估中因易感人群差异消耗导致的偏倚。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(5):800-811. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac015.
8
Duration of Protection against Mild and Severe Disease by Covid-19 Vaccines.新冠病毒疫苗对轻症和重症疾病的保护持续时间。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 27;386(4):340-350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115481. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines over a 9-Month Period in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州 9 个月期间的新冠疫苗有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 10;386(10):933-941. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2117128. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
10
Two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine protection against COVID-19 hospital admissions and deaths over time: a retrospective, population-based cohort study in Scotland and Brazil.两剂 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 疫苗对 COVID-19 住院和死亡的保护作用随时间变化的回顾性、基于人群的队列研究:苏格兰和巴西的研究。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 1;399(10319):25-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02754-9. Epub 2021 Dec 20.