• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨质疏松性椎体骨折:基于网络信息的可读性与质量分析

Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: An Analysis of Readability and Quality of Web-Based information.

作者信息

Hidayat Yasir, Rajkoomar Ashley Ghanshyam, Qadeer Muhammad Abrar, D'Souza Lester G

机构信息

Orthopaedics and Trauma, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, IRL.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jun 17;14(6):e26029. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26029. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.26029
PMID:35859974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288661/
Abstract

Introduction Vertebral compression fractures are among the most common fragility fractures with significant morbidity and mortality. With an aging population, the incidence of these fractures is on the rise. In this age of social and electronic media, there is a plethora of online information available. While access to healthcare information has increased, most of these websites remain beyond the comprehension of their target audience. Objective To assess the readability and quality of online information regarding osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods A search for the terms osteoporotic vertebral fractures, osteoporotic spinal fractures, and fragility spinal fractures was performed using the top five search engines. Eighty-three websites were identified and analyzed. Quality assessment was done using the DISCERN and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) tools while readability was analyzed using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch Kincaid Grade (FKG), and Gunning Fog Index (GFI). Results The mean DISCERN score was 39.55 while the mean JAMA was 2.2. Readability testing revealed a mean FRES score of 49.26 with 16 websites having a score of > 60, FKG 8.38, and GFI of 9.51. 33 websites had an FKG score of 8 or below 8. Conclusion The above results indicate that web-based information relating to osteoporotic vertebral fractures is of variable quality and readability. Although 40 % of websites are at the eighth grade or below level, only 16 % of websites are above the FRES score of 60, which makes online information difficult to comprehend by an average patient.

摘要

引言 椎体压缩性骨折是最常见的脆性骨折之一,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。随着人口老龄化,这些骨折的发病率正在上升。在这个社会和电子媒体时代,网上有大量的信息。虽然获取医疗保健信息的机会增加了,但这些网站中的大多数内容仍然超出了目标受众的理解范围。

目的 评估有关骨质疏松性椎体骨折的在线信息的可读性和质量。

方法 使用排名前五的搜索引擎搜索骨质疏松性椎体骨折、骨质疏松性脊柱骨折和脆性脊柱骨折等术语。共识别并分析了83个网站。使用DISCERN工具和《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)工具进行质量评估,同时使用弗莱什易读性分数(FRES)、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKG)和冈宁雾度指数(GFI)分析可读性。

结果 DISCERN评分的平均值为39.55,而JAMA评分为2.2。可读性测试显示,FRES评分的平均值为49.26,其中16个网站的评分>60,FKG为8.38,GFI为9.51。33个网站的FKG评分为8或低于8。

结论 上述结果表明,有关骨质疏松性椎体骨折的网络信息质量和可读性参差不齐。虽然40%的网站处于八年级及以下水平,但只有16%的网站FRES评分高于60,这使得普通患者难以理解在线信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/6d769c9a137c/cureus-0014-00000026029-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/a795996f9e19/cureus-0014-00000026029-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/a133fb7bf4fd/cureus-0014-00000026029-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/9514888ee903/cureus-0014-00000026029-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/6a7938d683d7/cureus-0014-00000026029-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/6d769c9a137c/cureus-0014-00000026029-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/a795996f9e19/cureus-0014-00000026029-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/a133fb7bf4fd/cureus-0014-00000026029-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/9514888ee903/cureus-0014-00000026029-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/6a7938d683d7/cureus-0014-00000026029-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06dd/9288661/6d769c9a137c/cureus-0014-00000026029-i05.jpg

相似文献

1
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: An Analysis of Readability and Quality of Web-Based information.骨质疏松性椎体骨折:基于网络信息的可读性与质量分析
Cureus. 2022 Jun 17;14(6):e26029. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26029. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.功能性内镜鼻窦手术:评估在线信息的可读性和质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Sep;105(7):639-644. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0123. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
4
The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.基于网络的鼻咽癌患者信息的可读性与质量:定量内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 27;7:e47762. doi: 10.2196/47762.
5
The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.计算机断层扫描相关风险:对可用于患者信息与指导的在线文本的可读性和可靠性评估
Cureus. 2022 Oct 27;14(10):e30758. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30758. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.在线子宫切除术患者信息:系统环境扫描质量和可读性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Aug;44(8):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
7
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
8
Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.评估关于儿童胸痛的在线资料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Dec;179(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03772-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
9
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
10
Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.与膝关节翻修置换术相关的患者在线信息的可读性及质量:一项客观分析。
Surgeon. 2022 Dec;20(6):e366-e370. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.009. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Content Analysis of Arabic Websites As Patient Resources for Osteoporosis.作为骨质疏松症患者资源的阿拉伯语网站内容分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 19;16(7):e64880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64880. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.全球骨质疏松症的患病率:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 17;16(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0.
2
Disparities in internet use among orthopedic outpatients.骨科门诊患者在互联网使用方面的差异。
Orthopedics. 2014 Feb;37(2):e133-40. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140124-14.
3
The effect of patient involvement in surgical decision making for carpal tunnel release on patient-reported outcome.患者参与腕管松解手术决策对患者报告结局的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Mar;39(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.025.
4
Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).欧盟的骨质疏松症:医疗管理、流行病学和经济负担。这份报告是与国际骨质疏松基金会(IOF)和欧洲制药工业协会联合会(EFPIA)合作编写的。
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
5
Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures.椎体压缩性骨折的评估与处理
Perm J. 2012 Fall;16(4):46-51. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-037.
6
Hyperkyphotic posture and risk of future osteoporotic fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.脊柱后凸姿势与未来骨质疏松性骨折风险:兰乔贝纳多研究
J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Mar;21(3):419-23. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.051201. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
7
Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health-related journals.健康相关期刊中患者教育页面的识字水平评估。
J Community Health. 2005 Jun;30(3):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-004-1959-x.
8
Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.骨质疏松性骨折的流行病学与转归
Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1761-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9.
9
Debate about evaluation and monitoring of sites carrying the HON-Logo.关于对带有健康在线网络标志(HON-Logo)的网站进行评估和监测的辩论。
J Med Internet Res. 2000 Apr-Jun;2(2):E13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2.2.e13.
10
Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.健康素养:科学事务委员会报告。美国医学协会科学事务委员会健康素养特设委员会
JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):552-7.