Cotugna Nancy, Vickery Connie E, Carpenter-Haefele Kara M
Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716-3750, USA.
J Community Health. 2005 Jun;30(3):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-004-1959-x.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reading level of patient education material from selected current health care journals. Ten patient education pages from a variety of health care journals were entered into a Microsoft Word program. Applying the Flesch-Kincaid readability formula available from Microsoft Word, a reading level for each page was established and compared to recommended standards. Only 2 of 10 patient education pages fell within the recommended reading levels for health-related materials, and 5 of 10 were above the estimated mean U.S. reading level of 8th grade. A 5th to 6th grade level is recommended for patient education materials. This study suggests that although it is known that low health literacy is a widespread problem, it is not always considered when patient-targeted materials are developed. Health care professionals need to become more active in addressing the literacy needs of the intended receiver of written health-related information.
本研究的目的是评估从选定的当前医疗保健期刊中获取的患者教育材料的阅读水平。从各种医疗保健期刊中选取了十页患者教育内容录入到微软Word程序中。应用微软Word提供的弗莱什-金凯德可读性公式,确定了每页的阅读水平,并与推荐标准进行比较。十页患者教育内容中只有两页符合健康相关材料的推荐阅读水平,十页中有五页高于美国估计的八年级平均阅读水平。患者教育材料建议采用五至六年级的阅读水平。这项研究表明,尽管人们知道健康素养低是一个普遍存在的问题,但在开发针对患者的材料时并不总是会考虑到这一点。医疗保健专业人员需要更加积极地满足书面健康相关信息预期接收者的识字需求。