Wahyuningtias Dewi Sukorini, Fauzi Aditya Rifqi, Purnomo Eko, Sofi Imam
Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jun 25;79:104086. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104086. eCollection 2022 Jul.
The non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma had a high success rate and is expected to reduce the length of hospitalization and patients' morbidity. Here, we aim to evaluate the outcomes of patients with blunt abdominal trauma after non-operative management and associate them with prognostic factors.
We performed a retrospective analysis on patients with blunt abdominal trauma who received non-operative management (NOM) at our institution from April 2018 to April 2021.
Two hundred eleven patients were included in this study who underwent non-operative management. Most of the subjects (73%) were males, with male to female ratio of 2.7:1. Most patients aged 20-29 years old (29.4%), FAST negative (62.1%), minor injured (45%), successfully managed nonoperatively (98.6%), received no transfusion (38.9%), and injured due to traffic accident (80.1%). ISS was significantly associated with FAST (p = 0.028), while male gender, NLR, PLR, and blood transfusion did not (p > 0.05). The presence of external injury was associated with FAST results (p = 0.039), while the head, facial, thoracic, pelvic, and skeletal injuries did not (p > 0.05). We also found a significant correlation between blood transfusion and patient survival with NOM outcomes (p = 0.047 and p = 0.041, respectively). Furthermore, external injury significantly correlated with NOM outcomes (p = 0.042). Multivariate analysis showed that external and pelvic injury was significantly associated with NOM outcomes (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.036, respectively).
The results of the FAST examination were not associated with the outcome of non-operative therapy. Moreover, the successful outcome of NOM might be affected by blood transfusions, the presence of external injuries, and pelvic injury.
钝性腹部创伤的非手术治疗成功率高,有望缩短住院时间并降低患者发病率。在此,我们旨在评估钝性腹部创伤患者非手术治疗后的结局,并将其与预后因素相关联。
我们对2018年4月至2021年4月在我院接受非手术治疗(NOM)的钝性腹部创伤患者进行了回顾性分析。
本研究纳入了211例接受非手术治疗的患者。大多数受试者(73%)为男性,男女比例为2.7:1。大多数患者年龄在20 - 29岁(29.4%),FAST检查结果为阴性(62.1%),轻伤(45%),非手术治疗成功(98.6%),未接受输血(38.9%),因交通事故受伤(80.1%)。损伤严重程度评分(ISS)与FAST检查结果显著相关(p = 0.028),而性别、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)及输血情况则无相关性(p > 0.05)。存在外部损伤与FAST检查结果相关(p = 0.039),而头部、面部、胸部、骨盆和骨骼损伤则无相关性(p > 0.05)。我们还发现输血与患者非手术治疗结局的生存率之间存在显著相关性(分别为p = 0.047和p = 0.041)。此外,外部损伤与非手术治疗结局显著相关(p = 0.042)。多因素分析显示,外部损伤和骨盆损伤与非手术治疗结局显著相关(分别为p < 0.0001和p = 0.036)。
FAST检查结果与非手术治疗结局无关。此外,非手术治疗的成功结局可能会受到输血、外部损伤和骨盆损伤的影响。