South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar;37(3):268-278. doi: 10.1177/02698811221104058. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly burdensome health condition, for which there are numerous accepted pharmacological and psychological interventions. Adjunctive treatment (augmentation/combination) is recommended for the ~50% of MDD patients who do not adequately respond to first-line treatment. We aimed to evaluate the current evidence for concomitant approaches for people with early-stage treatment-resistant depression (TRD; defined below).
We systematically searched Medline and Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science to identify randomised controlled trials of adjunctive treatment of ⩾10 adults with MDD who had not responded to ⩾1 adequate antidepressant. The cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool was used to assess study quality. Pre-post treatment meta-analyses were performed, allowing for comparison across heterogeneous study designs independent of comparator interventions.
In total, 115 trials investigating 48 treatments were synthesised. The mean intervention duration was 9 weeks (range 5 days to 18 months) with most studies assessed to have low ( = 57) or moderate ( = 51) RoB. The highest effect sizes (ESs) were from cognitive behavioural therapy (ES = 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-2.07), (es)ketamine (ES = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.23-1.73) and risperidone (ES = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.29-1.61). Only aripiprazole and lithium were examined in ⩾10 studies. Pill placebo (ES = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98) had a not inconsiderable ES, and only six treatments' 95% CIs did not overlap with pill placebo's (aripiprazole, (es)ketamine, mirtazapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone). We report marked heterogeneity between studies for almost all analyses.
Our findings support cautious optimism for several augmentation strategies; although considering the high prevalence of TRD, evidence remains inadequate for each treatment option.
重度抑郁症(MDD)是一种负担沉重的健康状况,有许多被认可的药物和心理干预方法。对于那些对一线治疗反应不佳的约 50%的 MDD 患者,建议采用辅助治疗(增效/联合治疗)。我们旨在评估针对早期治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD;定义如下)患者的联合治疗方法的现有证据。
我们系统地检索了 Medline 和 Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science,以确定对 ⩾10 名对 ⩾1 种充分抗抑郁药物治疗无反应的 MDD 成人进行辅助治疗的随机对照试验。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险(RoB)工具评估研究质量。进行了治疗前后的荟萃分析,允许在独立于比较干预措施的情况下对异质性研究设计进行比较。
共综合了 115 项试验,涉及 48 种治疗方法。干预的平均持续时间为 9 周(范围为 5 天至 18 个月),大多数研究的 RoB 评估为低( = 57)或中( = 51)。最高的效应量(ES)来自认知行为疗法(ES = 1.58,95%置信区间(CI):1.09-2.07)、(es)氯胺酮(ES = 1.48,95% CI:1.23-1.73)和利培酮(ES = 1.42,95% CI:1.29-1.61)。只有阿立哌唑和锂在 ⩾10 项研究中进行了检查。安慰剂丸(ES = 0.89,95% CI:0.81-0.98)的 ES 相当可观,只有六种治疗方法的 95%CI 与安慰剂丸的不重叠(阿立哌唑、(es)氯胺酮、米氮平、奥氮平、喹硫平和利培酮)。我们报告说,几乎所有分析的研究之间都存在明显的异质性。
我们的发现对几种增效策略持谨慎乐观态度;尽管考虑到 TRD 的高患病率,但每种治疗选择的证据仍然不足。