Suppr超能文献

一项探索人们购买锂补充剂的经历的调查:关于人们使用锂补充剂的经历的调查。

A Survey Exploring People's Experiences With Lithium Bought as a Supplement: Une enquête sur l'expérience des personnes avec le lithium en supplément.

作者信息

Strawbridge Rebecca, Myrtle Samuel, Carmellini Pietro, Hampsey Elliot, Cousins David A, Young Allan H

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 28:7067437251328282. doi: 10.1177/07067437251328282.

Abstract

ObjectiveLithium, despite its evidence base and range of indications, is often underutilized due to safety concerns associated with high-dose prescriptions and consequent necessity for regular blood monitoring. Emerging evidence suggests its potential benefits at lower doses, especially for its pro-cognitive effects and positive safety profile. While accessible as a supplement, empirical human evidence on neuropsychiatric effects is lacking. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence regarding the utilization and perceived effects of low-dose lithium supplements (LiS) in the community.MethodsCross-sectional, opportunistic survey of 211 participants aged ≥18 years who disclosed taking over-the-counter lithium supplements. The survey assessed sample demographics, supplement details, overall perspectives, and personal experiences related to the use of LiS.ResultsThe most common form of LiS taken was aspartate at 10 mg once per day, although lithium orotate and ionic lithium were also frequently used. The most common beliefs regarding the benefits of using lithium as a supplement concern efficacy for anxiety, but the most common improvements experienced was in the domain of cognition, closely followed by anxiety and mood. Mood was most commonly reported as the greatest improvement. Side effects and withdrawal phenomena were more prevalent than anticipated.ConclusionThis study revealed a diverse range of lithium supplements taken, in terms of dosage, formulation, frequency, and duration of intake. Anecdotal evidence highlighted prevalent perceived benefits and adverse effects. The study is, however, limited notably by its cross-sectional opportunistic design; more robust evidence, especially from controlled trials, is needed to fully establish the specific benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.Plain Language Summary TitleA survey exploring people's experiences with lithium bought as a supplement.Lithium is the oldest effective medication used in psychiatry and holds an important place today. However, there are challenges with lithium in high doses and it may still be effective in low doses. Lower doses of lithium can be bought as a supplement over the counter, but this version of lithium has not been studied in research. We did a survey aiming to tell us some information about the experiences of people who have taken this supplementary lithium ("LiS"). From 211 adults who completed our study, results suggested that LiS is taken in many different forms, at different doses, frequencies and for different durations. People commonly believed and/or found that LiS was beneficial for anxiety, mood and cognition. Side effects and symptoms after stopping LiS were, however, more common than expected. Because this was just an initial survey, more in depth and rigorous research studies are needed to fully understand the exact benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.

摘要

目的

锂盐尽管有循证依据且适应证广泛,但由于高剂量处方相关的安全问题以及随之而来的定期血液监测的必要性,其使用常常不足。新出现的证据表明其在低剂量时有潜在益处,尤其是对认知的促进作用和良好的安全性。虽然锂盐可作为补充剂获取,但缺乏关于其神经精神效应的实证性人体证据。本研究旨在提供关于社区中低剂量锂补充剂(LiS)的使用情况和感知效果的初步证据。

方法

对211名年龄≥18岁且透露正在服用非处方锂补充剂的参与者进行横断面机会性调查。该调查评估了样本的人口统计学特征、补充剂细节、总体看法以及与LiS使用相关的个人经历。

结果

服用的LiS最常见形式是天冬氨酸盐,每天10毫克,尽管乳清酸锂和离子锂也经常被使用。关于将锂作为补充剂使用的益处,最常见的看法是对焦虑有效,但最常体验到改善的领域是认知,其次是焦虑和情绪。情绪方面最常被报告为改善最大。副作用和戒断现象比预期更普遍。

结论

本研究揭示了在剂量、剂型、服用频率和持续时间方面服用的锂补充剂种类繁多。轶事证据突出了普遍感知到的益处和不良反应。然而,该研究显著受限于其横断面机会性设计;需要更有力的证据,尤其是来自对照试验的证据,以充分确定与不同形式和剂量的可获取锂补充剂相关的具体益处和缺点。

通俗易懂的总结标题

一项探索人们使用购买的锂补充剂经历的调查

锂是精神病学中使用最久的有效药物,如今仍占有重要地位。然而,高剂量锂存在挑战,低剂量时可能仍有效。低剂量锂可作为非处方药补充剂购买,但这种锂版本尚未在研究中得到研究。我们进行了一项调查,旨在了解服用这种补充性锂(“LiS”)的人的经历。从完成我们研究的211名成年人中,结果表明LiS有多种不同形式,服用剂量、频率和持续时间各不相同。人们普遍认为和/或发现LiS对焦虑、情绪和认知有益。然而,停止服用LiS后的副作用和症状比预期更常见。由于这只是一项初步调查,需要更深入和严谨的研究来充分了解与不同形式和剂量的可获取锂补充剂相关的确切益处和缺点。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Lithium: how low can you go?锂:你能降到多低?
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2024 Jan 30;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40345-024-00325-y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验