Suppr超能文献

宏基因组下一代测序在重症监护病房脓毒症患者病因诊断中的应用。

Utility of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Etiological Diagnosis of Patients with Sepsis in Intensive Care Units.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospitalgrid.412094.a, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospitalgrid.412094.a, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0074622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00746-22. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

Abstract

The performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was evaluated and compared with that of conventional culture testing in patients with sepsis. Prospective blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples from 50 patients with sepsis were tested using cultures (bacterial, fungal, and viral) and mNGS of microbial DNA (blood and BALF) and RNA (BALF). mNGS had higher detection rates than blood culture (88.0% versus 26.0%, < 0.001) and BALF culture (92.0% versus 76.0%, = 0.054). RNA-based mNGS has increased the detection rate of several bacteria, fungi, and viruses, but not mycobacteria and Toxoplasma gondii. The number of multiple detections per specimen was higher in BALF (92.0%) than in blood (78.0%) samples, and the highest number of pathogens detected in a single specimen was 32. Among blood samples, compared to cultures, mNGS detected significantly more bacteria ( < 0.001), fungi ( = 0.012), and viruses ( < 0.001), whereas BALF mNGS had a higher detection rate for bacteria ( < 0.001) and viruses ( < 0.001). The percentage of mNGS-positive samples was significantly higher than that of culture-positive samples for several Gram-negative bacteria, some Gram-positive bacteria, and viruses, but not fungi. Mycobacteria had a higher detection rate by culture than by mNGS, but the difference was not significant due to the small sample size. The positive and negative agreements with 95% confidence intervals of mNGS and culture were 62.0% (50.4 to 72.7) and 96.8% (96.5 to 97.1), respectively. mNGS offers a sensitive diagnostic method for patients with sepsis and is promising for the detection of multipathogen infections. Clinical correlation is advised to interpret mNGS data due to the lack of unified diagnostic criteria. Delays in effective antimicrobial therapy have resulted in decreased survival rates among patients with sepsis. However, current culture-based diagnostic methods have low sensitivity because of concurrent antibiotic exposure and fastidious and atypical causative organisms. Among patients with sepsis, we showed that mNGS methods had higher positive rates than culture methods, especially for bacteria, viruses, and multipathogen infections, which are difficult to culture and detect in patients treated with antibiotics. RNA-based mNGS has increased the detection rate of several bacteria, fungi, and viruses, but not mycobacteria and Toxoplasma gondii. mNGS also showed a high negative percent agreement with cultures. However, the interpretation of mNGS data should be combined with clinical data and conventional methods considering the lack of unified diagnostic criteria.

摘要

对脓毒症患者进行宏基因组下一代测序 (mNGS) 的性能评估,并将其与传统培养检测进行比较。前瞻性采集 50 例脓毒症患者的血液和支气管肺泡灌洗液 (BALF) 样本,分别进行培养(细菌、真菌和病毒)和微生物 DNA(血液和 BALF)和 RNA(BALF)的 mNGS。mNGS 的检测率高于血培养(88.0% 对 26.0%,<0.001)和 BALF 培养(92.0% 对 76.0%,=0.054)。基于 RNA 的 mNGS 提高了几种细菌、真菌和病毒的检测率,但不包括分枝杆菌和刚地弓形虫。BALF 样本的多重检测数量(92.0%)高于血液样本(78.0%),单个样本中检测到的病原体数量最多为 32 种。与培养相比,血液样本中 mNGS 检测到的细菌(<0.001)、真菌(=0.012)和病毒(<0.001)明显更多,而 BALF mNGS 检测到的细菌(<0.001)和病毒(<0.001)的检测率更高。mNGS 阳性样本的百分比明显高于培养阳性样本,尤其是某些革兰氏阴性菌、某些革兰氏阳性菌和病毒,但真菌除外。分枝杆菌的培养检测率高于 mNGS,但由于样本量小,差异无统计学意义。mNGS 与培养的阳性和阴性一致性及其 95%置信区间分别为 62.0%(50.4 至 72.7)和 96.8%(96.5 至 97.1)。mNGS 为脓毒症患者提供了一种敏感的诊断方法,有望用于检测多病原体感染。由于缺乏统一的诊断标准,建议进行临床相关性分析以解释 mNGS 数据。脓毒症患者的抗生素治疗延迟会导致死亡率降低。然而,目前基于培养的诊断方法由于并发抗生素暴露和难以培养以及病原体不典型,其敏感性较低。在脓毒症患者中,我们发现 mNGS 方法的阳性率高于培养方法,尤其是对细菌、病毒和多病原体感染的阳性率,因为这些病原体在接受抗生素治疗的患者中难以培养和检测。基于 RNA 的 mNGS 提高了几种细菌、真菌和病毒的检测率,但不包括分枝杆菌和刚地弓形虫。mNGS 与培养的阴性百分比一致性也很高。然而,考虑到缺乏统一的诊断标准,应结合临床数据和常规方法来解释 mNGS 数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e18/9430677/a5b84fb812f0/spectrum.00746-22-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验