• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解数据质量:在行为经济学香烟需求的众包调查中,教学理解作为一种实用的度量标准。

Understanding data quality: Instructional comprehension as a practical metric in crowdsourced investigations of behavioral economic cigarette demand.

机构信息

Fralin Biomedical Research Institute.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Aug;30(4):415-423. doi: 10.1037/pha0000579.

DOI:10.1037/pha0000579
PMID:35862135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9469988/
Abstract

Crowdsourcing platforms allow researchers to quickly recruit and collect behavioral economic measures in substance-using populations, such as cigarette smokers. Despite the broad utility and flexibility, data quality issues have been an object of concern. In two separate studies recruiting cigarette smokers, we sought to investigate the association between a practical quality control measure (accuracy on an instruction quiz), on internal consistency of number of cigarettes smoked per day and purchasing patterns of tobacco products in an experimental tobacco marketplace (ETM; Study 1), and in a cigarette purchase task (CPT; Study 2). Participants (N = 312 in Study 1; N = 119 in Study 2) were recruited from Amazon mechanical turk. Both studies included task instructions, a quiz, a purchase task, cigarette usage and dependence questions, and demographics. The results show that participants who answered all instruction items correctly: (a) reported the number of cigarettes per day more consistently (partial η² = 0.11, p < .001, Study 1; partial η² = 0.09, p = .016, Study 2), (b) demonstrated increased model fit among the cigarette demand curves (partial η² = 0.23, p < .001, Study 1; partial η² = 0.08, p = .002, Study 2), and purchased tobacco products in the ETM more consistently with their current usage. We conclude that instruction quizzes before purchase tasks may be useful for researchers evaluating demand data. Instruction quizzes with multiple items may allow researchers to choose the level of data quality appropriate for their studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

众包平台允许研究人员快速招募和收集物质使用人群(如吸烟者)的行为经济学措施。尽管具有广泛的实用性和灵活性,但数据质量问题一直是人们关注的焦点。在两项分别招募吸烟者的研究中,我们试图调查一种实用的质量控制措施(在指令测验上的准确性)与每日吸烟量的内部一致性以及实验烟草市场(ETM;研究 1)和香烟购买任务(CPT;研究 2)中烟草产品购买模式之间的关联。参与者(研究 1 中为 312 人;研究 2 中为 119 人)是从亚马逊机械土耳其招募的。这两项研究都包括任务说明、测验、购买任务、吸烟和依赖问题以及人口统计数据。结果表明,回答所有指令项目的参与者:(a)报告的每日吸烟量更一致(部分 η²=0.11,p<.001,研究 1;部分 η²=0.09,p=0.016,研究 2),(b)在香烟需求曲线中表现出更高的模型拟合度(部分 η²=0.23,p<.001,研究 1;部分 η²=0.08,p=0.002,研究 2),并且在 ETM 中购买烟草产品与他们目前的使用更一致。我们的结论是,购买任务之前的指令测验可能对评估需求数据的研究人员有用。具有多个项目的指令测验可能允许研究人员选择适合其研究的数据质量水平。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5069/9469988/c280fdaf92af/nihms-1833529-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5069/9469988/f484c7987772/nihms-1833529-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5069/9469988/e5170bb69951/nihms-1833529-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5069/9469988/c280fdaf92af/nihms-1833529-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5069/9469988/f484c7987772/nihms-1833529-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5069/9469988/e5170bb69951/nihms-1833529-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5069/9469988/c280fdaf92af/nihms-1833529-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding data quality: Instructional comprehension as a practical metric in crowdsourced investigations of behavioral economic cigarette demand.理解数据质量:在行为经济学香烟需求的众包调查中,教学理解作为一种实用的度量标准。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Aug;30(4):415-423. doi: 10.1037/pha0000579.
2
Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence.加热烟草制品戒烟和降低吸烟率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013790.pub2.
3
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
4
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
5
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.水烟戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 31;2015(7):CD005549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005549.pub3.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between cannabis risk perceptions and Delta-8 THC use among young adults.大麻风险认知与年轻成年人中δ-8四氢大麻酚使用之间的关联。
J Subst Use. 2025;30(2):223-229. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2023.2293798. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Delay discounting data in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Modeling and analysis considerations.青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究中的延迟折扣数据:建模与分析考量
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Jun;33(3):225-238. doi: 10.1037/pha0000766. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Restrictions of cigarette and e-cigarette flavor and filter ventilation on demand and substitution in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace.在实验烟草市场中,按需求限制香烟和电子烟的口味和过滤嘴通风以及替代产品。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Oct 1;263:112422. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112422. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
4
Selective Reduction of Socioeconomic Disparities in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace: Effects of Cigarette and E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions.选择性减少实验烟草市场中的社会经济差异:香烟和电子烟口味限制的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S103-S111. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad070.
5
Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, Cannabis, and Delta-8 THC: Perceived Likelihood, Risk Perceptions, and Behaviors.在酒精、大麻和δ-8四氢大麻酚影响下驾驶:感知可能性、风险认知与行为
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2024 Apr 9:1-10. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2024.2339506.
6
Utility of the 5-trial adjusting delay task in screening for high delay discounting rates: A cohort study of individuals reporting harmful alcohol and tobacco use.5 次尝试调整延迟任务在筛查高延迟折扣率中的效用:报告有害酒精和烟草使用的个体的队列研究。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Aug;31(4):786-792. doi: 10.1037/pha0000623. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
7
Crowdsourcing methods in addiction science: Emerging research and best practices.成瘾科学中的众包方法:新兴研究与最佳实践。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Aug;30(4):379-380. doi: 10.1037/pha0000582.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the Impact of Tobacco Parity and Harm Reduction Tax Proposals Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace.利用实验性烟草市场估计烟草均等和减少伤害税收提案的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157835.
2
The Illegal Experimental Tobacco Marketplace I: Effects of Vaping Product Bans.非法实验烟草市场 I:电子烟产品禁令的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 29;23(10):1744-1753. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab088.
3
The particular case of conducting addiction intervention research on Mechanical Turk.在亚马逊土耳其机器人平台上进行成瘾干预研究的特殊情况。
Addiction. 2020 Oct;115(10):1971-1972. doi: 10.1111/add.15097. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.在成瘾研究中使用 Mechanical Turk 进行数据收集:效用、关注点和最佳实践。
Addiction. 2020 Oct;115(10):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/add.15032. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
5
The R package : Behavioral Economic Easy Demand.R软件包:行为经济学简易需求
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Dec 12;42(1):163-180. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-00187-7. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Behavioral economic measurement of cigarette demand: A descriptive review of published approaches to the cigarette purchase task.行为经济学对香烟需求的衡量:香烟购买任务中已出版方法的描述性综述。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Dec;28(6):688-705. doi: 10.1037/pha0000347. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Assessing Cannabis Demand: A Comprehensive Review of the Marijuana Purchase Task.评估大麻需求:大麻购买任务的综合述评。
Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Jan;17(1):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00819-z.
8
Sensitivity of hypothetical purchase task indices when studying substance use: A systematic literature review.假设购买任务指数在研究物质使用时的敏感性:系统文献回顾。
Prev Med. 2019 Nov;128:105789. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105789. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
9
Behavioral economic tobacco demand in relation to cigarette consumption and nicotine dependence: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional relationships.与吸烟量和尼古丁依赖有关的行为经济学烟草需求:横断面关系的荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2019 Nov;114(11):1926-1940. doi: 10.1111/add.14736. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
10
A Novel Method for Evaluating the Acceptability of Substitutes for Cigarettes: The Experimental Tobacco Marketplace.一种评估卷烟替代品可接受性的新方法:实验性烟草市场
Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Jul;3(3):266-279. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.3.3.