Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Spain.
Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Addiction. 2019 Nov;114(11):1926-1940. doi: 10.1111/add.14736. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
A cigarette purchase task (CPT) aims to characterize individual variation in the reinforcing value of tobacco. This meta-analysis estimated the associations between cigarette demand, tobacco consumption and nicotine dependence using this task.
A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies identified by PubMed and PsycINFO databases was conducted. Fixed- and random-effects models were used. The study also examined the model used to derive elasticity of demand (exponential or exponentiated) as a potential moderator. Publication bias was assessed using 'fail-safe N', Begg-Mazumdar test, Egger's test, Tweedie's trim-and-fill approach and meta-regression of publication year with effect size.
Studies from any setting that reported coefficient correlations on the tested associations.
Daily cigarette users (i.e. 5 to 38 cigarettes per day; n = 7649).
Cigarette consumption, nicotine dependence and five tobacco demand indicators: intensity (i.e. consumption at no cost), elasticity (i.e. sensitivity to rises in costs), O (maximum expenditure), P (i.e. price at which consumption becomes elastic) and breakpoint (i.e. price at which consumption ceases).
Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. All the CPT indices were significantly correlated with smoking behavior (rs = 0.044-0.572, Ps = 0.012-10 ). Medium-to-large effect size associations were present for intensity, O and elasticity, whereas small effects were obtained for breakpoint and P . Evidence of a moderating effect of the different elasticity modeling approaches was not present. There was limited evidence of publication bias.
All five demand indices derived from the cigarette purchase task by (CPT) were robustly associated with cigarette consumption and tobacco dependence. Of the demand indices, maximum expenditure, intensity and elasticity exhibited the largest magnitude associations.
香烟购买任务(CPT)旨在描述个体对烟草强化价值的差异。本研究通过该任务评估了香烟需求、烟草消费和尼古丁依赖之间的关联。
通过 PubMed 和 PsycINFO 数据库对已发表的横断面研究进行了元分析。使用固定效应和随机效应模型。研究还检查了用于推导需求弹性(指数或指数化)的模型作为潜在的调节因素。使用“失效安全 N”、Begg-Mazumdar 检验、Egger 检验、Tweedie 的修剪和填充方法以及按发表年份与效应量进行元回归来评估发表偏倚。
来自任何报告所测试关联的系数相关性的研究环境。
每天吸烟的人(即每天 5 至 38 支香烟;n=7649)。
吸烟量、尼古丁依赖和五个烟草需求指标:强度(即免费消费)、弹性(即对成本上升的敏感性)、O(最大支出)、P(即消费变得有弹性的价格)和断点(即消费停止的价格)。
符合纳入标准的研究有 23 项。所有 CPT 指数与吸烟行为显著相关(rs=0.044-0.572,Ps=0.012-10)。强度、O 和弹性具有中等至较大的效应量关联,而断点和 P 则具有较小的效应量关联。不同弹性建模方法的调节作用的证据并不存在。发表偏倚的证据有限。
香烟购买任务(CPT)中得出的所有五个需求指标与香烟消费和烟草依赖均有显著关联。在需求指标中,最大支出、强度和弹性表现出最大的关联程度。