University of Queenslandgrid.1003.2 Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Aug 16;66(8):e0014222. doi: 10.1128/aac.00142-22. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
Morbidity and mortality related to ventriculitis in neurocritical care patients remain high. Antibiotic dose optimization may improve therapeutic outcomes. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in infected critically ill patients was developed. We applied the final model to determine optimal meropenem dosing regimens required to achieve targeted cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Neurocritical care patients receiving meropenem and with a diagnosis of ventriculitis or extracranial infection were recruited from two centers to this study. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and assayed. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. We sought to determine optimized dosing regimens that achieved meropenem cerebrospinal fluid concentrations above pathogen MICs for 40% of the dosing interval, or a higher target ratio of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid trough concentrations to pathogen MIC of ≥1. In total, 53 plasma and 34 cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from eight patients. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were appropriately described using a three-compartment model with linear plasma clearance scaled for creatinine clearance and cerebrospinal fluid penetration scaled for patient age. Considerable interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was apparent, particularly in the cerebrospinal fluid. Percent coefficients of variation for meropenem clearance from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were 41.7% and 89.6%, respectively; for meropenem, the volume of distribution in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid values were 63.4% and 58.3%, respectively. High doses (up to 8 to 10 g/day) improved attainment of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid target exposures, particularly for less susceptible organisms (MICs, ≥0.25 mg/L). Standard meropenem doses of 2 g every 8 h may not achieve effective concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid in all critically ill patients. Higher doses, or alternative dosing methods (e.g., loading dose followed by continuous infusion) may be required to optimize cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Doses of up to 8 to 10 g/day either as intermittent boluses or continuous infusion would be suitable for patients with augmented renal clearance; lower doses may be considered for patients with impaired renal function as empirical suggestions. Ongoing dosing should be tailored to the individual patient circumstances. Notably, the study population was small and dosing recommendations may not be generalizable to all critically ill patients.
在神经危重病患者中,与脑室炎相关的发病率和死亡率仍然很高。优化抗生素剂量可能会改善治疗效果。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种感染性危重病患者美罗培南的群体药代动力学模型。我们应用最终模型来确定达到目标脑脊液暴露所需的美罗培南最佳给药方案。这项研究从两个中心招募了接受美罗培南治疗且诊断为脑室炎或颅外感染的神经危重病患者。采集了连续的血浆和脑脊液样本并进行了检测。使用 Pmetrics 进行了群体药代动力学建模和蒙特卡罗给药模拟。我们旨在确定优化的给药方案,使美罗培南脑脊液浓度在 40%的给药间隔内超过病原体 MIC,或者使美罗培南脑脊液谷浓度与病原体 MIC 的比值≥1。总共从 8 名患者中获得了 53 份血浆和 34 份脑脊液样本。使用具有线性血浆清除率的三房室模型和根据肌酐清除率缩放的脑脊液穿透率来适当描述美罗培南药代动力学。明显存在个体间药代动力学变异性,尤其是在脑脊液中。美罗培南从血浆和脑脊液清除率的百分比变异系数分别为 41.7%和 89.6%;对于美罗培南,血浆和脑脊液分布容积值分别为 63.4%和 58.3%。高剂量(高达 8 至 10 g/天)可改善美罗培南脑脊液目标暴露的实现,尤其是对敏感性较低的病原体(MIC≥0.25mg/L)。标准美罗培南剂量 2 g 每 8 小时可能无法在所有危重病患者的脑脊液中达到有效浓度。可能需要更高的剂量或替代给药方法(例如,负荷剂量后连续输注)来优化脑脊液暴露。高达 8 至 10 g/天的剂量,无论是间歇推注还是连续输注,都适合有增强的肾功能清除的患者;对于肾功能受损的患者,可以考虑较低的剂量作为经验性建议。持续的给药应根据个体患者情况进行调整。值得注意的是,研究人群规模较小,给药建议可能不适用于所有危重病患者。