• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于物种丰富度和丰度分析的利用旱獭直肠样本的 RNA 和 DNA 病毒组学方法的综合评估。

Comprehensive Evaluation of RNA and DNA Viromic Methods Based on Species Richness and Abundance Analyses Using Marmot Rectal Samples.

机构信息

Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.

College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China.

出版信息

mSystems. 2022 Aug 30;7(4):e0043022. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00430-22. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1128/msystems.00430-22
PMID:35862817
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9426427/
Abstract

Viral metagenomics is the most powerful tool to profile viromic composition for a given sample. Different viromic methods, including amplification-free ones, have been developed, but choosing them for different purposes requires comprehensive benchmarks. Here, we assessed the performance of four routinely used methods, i.e., multiple displacement amplification (MDA), direct metagenomic sequencing (MTG), sequence-independent single-primer amplification (SIA), and metatranscriptomic sequencing (MTT), using marmot rectal samples as the templates spiked with five known viruses of different genome types. The obtained clean data were differently contaminated by host and bacterial genomes, resulting in MDA having the most, with ~72.1%, but MTT had only ~7.5% data, useful for follow-up viromic analysis. MDA showed a broader spectrum with higher efficiency to profile the DNA virome, and MTT captured almost all RNA viruses with extraordinary sensitivity; hence, they are advisable in richness-based viromic studies. MTG was weak in capturing single-stranded DNA viruses, and SIA could detect both RNA and DNA viruses but with high randomness. Due to biases to certain types of viruses, the four methods caused different alterations to species abundance compared to the initial virus composition. SIA and MDA introduced greater stochastic errors to relative abundances of species, genus, and family taxa, whereas the two amplification-free methods were more tolerant toward such errors and thus are recommendable in abundance-based analyses. In addition, genus taxon is a compromising analytic level that ensures technically supported and biologically and/or ecologically meaningful viromic conclusions. Viral metagenomics can be roughly divided into species richness-based studies and species abundance-based analyses. Viromic methods with different principles have been developed, but rational selection of these techniques according to different purposes requires comprehensive understanding of their properties. By assessing the four most widely used methods using template samples, we found that multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and metatranscriptomic sequencing (MTT) are advisable for species richness-based viromic studies, as they show excellent efficiency to detect DNA and RNA viruses. Meanwhile, metagenomic sequencing (MTG) and MTT are more compatible with stochastic errors of methods introduced into relative abundance of viromic taxa and hence are rational choices in species abundance-based analyses. This study also highlights that MTG needs to tackle host genome contamination and ameliorate the capacity to detect single-stranded DNA viruses in the future, and the MTT method requires an improvement in bacterial rRNA depletion prior to library preparation.

摘要

病毒宏基因组学是分析特定样本病毒组组成的最强大工具。已经开发了不同的病毒组学方法,包括无扩增方法,但为了不同的目的选择它们需要全面的基准测试。在这里,我们使用土拨鼠直肠样本作为模板,用五种不同基因组类型的已知病毒进行了常规使用的四种方法(多重置换扩增(MDA)、直接宏基因组测序(MTG)、无序列依赖性单引物扩增(SIA)和宏转录组测序(MTT))的性能评估。获得的清洁数据受到宿主和细菌基因组的不同污染,导致 MDA 受到的污染最多,约为 72.1%,而 MTT 仅受到约 7.5%的数据污染,可用于后续病毒组分析。MDA 显示出更广泛的谱,更高的效率来分析 DNA 病毒组,而 MTT 以极高的灵敏度捕获了几乎所有的 RNA 病毒;因此,它们在基于丰富度的病毒组学研究中是明智的选择。MTG 在捕获单链 DNA 病毒方面较弱,而 SIA 可以检测 RNA 和 DNA 病毒,但具有很高的随机性。由于对某些类型的病毒存在偏见,与初始病毒组成相比,这四种方法导致了物种丰度的不同变化。SIA 和 MDA 对物种、属和科分类群的相对丰度引入了更大的随机误差,而两种无扩增方法对这些误差的容忍度更高,因此在基于丰度的分析中是推荐的。此外,属分类群是一个折衷的分析水平,它确保了基于技术支持和生物和/或生态意义的病毒组结论。病毒宏基因组学大致可分为基于物种丰富度的研究和基于物种丰度的分析。已经开发了具有不同原理的病毒组学方法,但根据不同的目的合理选择这些技术需要全面了解它们的特性。通过对模板样本的四种最广泛使用的方法进行评估,我们发现多重置换扩增(MDA)和宏转录组测序(MTT)适合基于物种丰富度的病毒组学研究,因为它们表现出高效检测 DNA 和 RNA 病毒的能力。同时,宏基因组测序(MTG)和 MTT 与方法引入的相对病毒组分类群丰度的随机误差更兼容,因此是基于物种丰度的分析的合理选择。本研究还强调,MTG 需要解决宿主基因组污染问题,并改善其检测单链 DNA 病毒的能力,而 MTT 方法在准备文库之前需要改进细菌 rRNA 的耗竭。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/df6954b98c44/msystems.00430-22-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/5ccbee600cd7/msystems.00430-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/b77006f31e39/msystems.00430-22-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/38ec6435bc88/msystems.00430-22-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/1eed89268f96/msystems.00430-22-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/60d7c915dea0/msystems.00430-22-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/df6954b98c44/msystems.00430-22-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/5ccbee600cd7/msystems.00430-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/b77006f31e39/msystems.00430-22-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/38ec6435bc88/msystems.00430-22-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/1eed89268f96/msystems.00430-22-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/60d7c915dea0/msystems.00430-22-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f929/9426427/df6954b98c44/msystems.00430-22-f006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive Evaluation of RNA and DNA Viromic Methods Based on Species Richness and Abundance Analyses Using Marmot Rectal Samples.基于物种丰富度和丰度分析的利用旱獭直肠样本的 RNA 和 DNA 病毒组学方法的综合评估。
mSystems. 2022 Aug 30;7(4):e0043022. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00430-22. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Phytovirome Analysis of Wild Plant Populations: Comparison of Double-Stranded RNA and Virion-Associated Nucleic Acid Metagenomic Approaches.植物病毒组分析野生植物群体:双链 RNA 和病毒粒子相关核酸宏基因组方法的比较。
J Virol. 2019 Dec 12;94(1). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01462-19.
3
Assessment of REPLI-g Multiple Displacement Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Techniques for Metagenomic Applications.用于宏基因组学应用的REPLI-g多重置换全基因组扩增(WGA)技术评估
J Biomol Tech. 2017 Apr;28(1):46-55. doi: 10.7171/jbt.17-2801-008. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
Viral Metagenome-Based Precision Surveillance of Pig Population at Large Scale Reveals Viromic Signatures of Sample Types and Influence of Farming Management on Pig Virome.基于病毒宏基因组的大规模猪群精准监测揭示样本类型的病毒组特征及养殖管理对猪病毒组的影响。
mSystems. 2021 Jun 29;6(3):e0042021. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00420-21. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
5
Evaluation of bias induced by viral enrichment and random amplification protocols in metagenomic surveys of saliva DNA viruses.评价唾液病毒宏基因组调查中病毒富集和随机扩增方法引起的偏差。
Microbiome. 2018 Jun 28;6(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0507-3.
6
Amplification methods bias metagenomic libraries of uncultured single-stranded and double-stranded DNA viruses.扩增方法会偏倚未培养的单链和双链 DNA 病毒的宏基因组文库。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Nov;77(21):7663-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00289-11. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
7
Elimination of Foreign Sequences in Eukaryotic Viral Reference Genomes Improves the Accuracy of Virome Analysis.真核病毒参考基因组中外源序列的消除可提高病毒组分析的准确性。
mSystems. 2022 Dec 20;7(6):e0090722. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00907-22. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
8
Optimization and validation of sample preparation for metagenomic sequencing of viruses in clinical samples.优化和验证临床样本宏基因组测序中病毒样品制备。
Microbiome. 2017 Aug 8;5(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0317-z.
9
Optimization and evaluation of viral metagenomic amplification and sequencing procedures toward a genome-level resolution of the human fecal DNA virome.优化和评估病毒宏基因组扩增和测序程序,以实现人类粪便 DNA 病毒组的全基因组分辨率。
J Adv Res. 2023 Jun;48:75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
10
Metatranscriptomic Sequencing Reveals Host Species as an Important Factor Shaping the Mosquito Virome.宏转录组测序揭示宿主物种是塑造蚊子病毒组的重要因素。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):e0465522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04655-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-transcriptomics characterization of individual reveals a wide spectrum of viral and bacterial pathogens in Inner Mongolia of China.个体的宏转录组学特征揭示了中国内蒙古地区广泛的病毒和细菌病原体。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Sep 2;13(9):e0018025. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00180-25. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Complexity of Diarrhea-Associated Viruses in Stunted Pigs Identified by Viral Metagenomics.通过病毒宏基因组学鉴定的生长受阻猪中腹泻相关病毒的复杂性
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025 Jun 18;2025:1974716. doi: 10.1155/tbed/1974716. eCollection 2025.
3
A Comparison of Methods for the Optimal Recovery of the Human Fecal Virome.

本文引用的文献

1
Cryptic and abundant marine viruses at the evolutionary origins of Earth's RNA virome.地球 RNA 病毒组进化起源处的隐匿且丰富的海洋病毒。
Science. 2022 Apr 8;376(6589):156-162. doi: 10.1126/science.abm5847. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Diversity and evolution of the animal virome.动物病毒组的多样性与演化。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Jun;20(6):321-334. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00665-x. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
Viral Metagenome-Based Precision Surveillance of Pig Population at Large Scale Reveals Viromic Signatures of Sample Types and Influence of Farming Management on Pig Virome.
人类粪便病毒组最佳回收方法的比较
medRxiv. 2025 May 13:2025.05.12.25327428. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.12.25327428.
4
Isolation and Identification of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus from Farmed Mink in Shandong, China.中国山东养殖水貂中发热伴血小板减少综合征病毒的分离与鉴定
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Apr 5;2024:9604673. doi: 10.1155/2024/9604673. eCollection 2024.
5
Isolation and characterization of goose astrovirus genotype 1 causing enteritis in goslings from Sichuan Province, China.中国四川省雏鹅源1型鹅星状病毒的分离鉴定及其致肠炎特性研究
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Apr 9;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04482-9.
6
Natural fatal infection of Tembusu virus in bottlenose dolphins in Thailand.泰国宽吻海豚感染坦布苏病毒的自然致死性感染
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93477-5.
7
Identification and genetic analysis of new ephemeroviruses in wild boars in China.中国野猪中新短病毒的鉴定与遗传分析。
Virol Sin. 2025 Apr;40(2):186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.virs.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
8
A compendium of 8,176 bat RNA viral metagenomes reveals ecological drivers and circulation dynamics.一份包含8176个蝙蝠RNA病毒宏基因组的纲要揭示了生态驱动因素和传播动态。
Nat Microbiol. 2025 Feb;10(2):554-568. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01884-7. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
9
Geographical distribution and characterization of Jingmen tick virus in wild boars in China.中国野猪中荆门蜱病毒的地理分布及特征
Virol Sin. 2025 Feb;40(1):137-140. doi: 10.1016/j.virs.2024.12.011. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
10
Viromics-based precision diagnosis of reproductive abnormalities in cows reveals a reassortant Akabane disease virus.基于病毒组学的奶牛生殖异常精准诊断揭示了一种重组的阿卡斑病毒。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Nov 29;20(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04400-5.
基于病毒宏基因组的大规模猪群精准监测揭示样本类型的病毒组特征及养殖管理对猪病毒组的影响。
mSystems. 2021 Jun 29;6(3):e0042021. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00420-21. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions.人类病毒组:组装、组成和宿主相互作用。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Aug;19(8):514-527. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00536-5. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Thousands of previously unknown phages discovered in whole-community human gut metagenomes.在全社区人类肠道宏基因组中发现了数千种以前未知的噬菌体。
Microbiome. 2021 Mar 29;9(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01017-w.
6
Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity.人类肠道噬菌体多样性的大规模扩张。
Cell. 2021 Feb 18;184(4):1098-1109.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.029.
7
The microbial rare biosphere: current concepts, methods and ecological principles.微生物稀有生物圈:当前概念、方法和生态原则。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021 Jan 8;97(1). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa227.
8
The Gut Virome Database Reveals Age-Dependent Patterns of Virome Diversity in the Human Gut.肠道病毒组数据库揭示了人类肠道中病毒组多样性的年龄依赖性模式。
Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Nov 11;28(5):724-740.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
9
The LUCA and its complex virome.LUCA 及其复杂的病毒组。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020 Nov;18(11):661-670. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0408-x. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2.Kraken 2 提升宏基因组分析。
Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 28;20(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0.