• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作压力筛查器(WOSS-13)和工作韧性量表(ReWoS-24)的验证。

Validation of the work stress screener (WOSS-13) and resilience at work scale (ReWoS-24).

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2022 Sep;160:110989. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110989. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110989
PMID:35863115
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Work stress is a global issue with countries such as the UK requiring organisations to protect employees. Work stress can be beneficial (challenging) or harmful (overwhelming), and characteristics such as resilience are thought to mitigate some of the negative effects. This paper describes the validation of two new scales. The WOSS-13 was designed to measure both benign and harmful experiences of work stress, while the ReWoS-24 captures information about individual and team resilience.

METHODS

For both scales the assessment of individual items, domains captured by scale items, reliability and validity were completed using data from a survey of 1980 individuals from the University of York, England. A sub-sample of respondents (N = 609) provided additional data for retest purposes. Analyses were performed using these two samples.

RESULTS

Responses to scale items were found to be normally distributed. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the WOSS-13 was comprised of three subscales: positive work-related affect/stress, general positive affect and harmful stress. The ReWoS-24 is presented as four sub-scales: general well-being, well-being at work, satisfaction with job performance and team resilience. All subscales demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.80). Both scales complement existing measures of stress and mental health.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that the WOSS-13 is a valid and reliable measure which enables the assessment of both benign and harmful forms of work stress. The ReWoS-24 is a valid and reliable measure of individual and team resilience. These scales could be used in workplaces to assess for and mitigate against, harmful work stress.

摘要

目的

工作压力是一个全球性问题,英国等国家要求各组织保护员工。工作压力可能有益(有挑战性),也可能有害(压倒性),而韧性等特征被认为可以减轻一些负面影响。本文介绍了两个新量表的验证。WOSS-13 旨在衡量工作压力的良性和有害体验,而 ReWoS-24 则捕捉有关个人和团队韧性的信息。

方法

对于这两个量表,使用来自英格兰约克大学 1980 名个体的调查数据完成了对个体项目、量表项目所捕获的领域、信度和效度的评估。一组受访者(N=609)提供了额外的数据用于重测目的。使用这两个样本进行了分析。

结果

发现对量表项目的反应呈正态分布。验证性因素分析表明,WOSS-13 由三个分量表组成:与工作相关的积极情绪/压力、一般积极情绪和有害压力。ReWoS-24 呈现为四个分量表:一般幸福感、工作幸福感、工作绩效满意度和团队韧性。所有分量表的内部一致性都很好(克朗巴赫的 alpha ≥0.80)。这两个量表都补充了现有的压力和心理健康测量。

结论

研究结果表明,WOSS-13 是一种有效且可靠的测量工具,可用于评估良性和有害形式的工作压力。ReWoS-24 是个体和团队韧性的有效且可靠的衡量标准。这些量表可用于工作场所评估和减轻有害的工作压力。

相似文献

1
Validation of the work stress screener (WOSS-13) and resilience at work scale (ReWoS-24).工作压力筛查器(WOSS-13)和工作韧性量表(ReWoS-24)的验证。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Sep;160:110989. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110989. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
2
Validation of a Chinese version of the Analysing and Developing Adaptability and Performance in Teams to Enhance Resilience Scale in nurses in China.验证中文版的团队适应性和绩效分析与发展量表在提高中国护士韧性中的应用。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Jul;30(5):1324-1336. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13628. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Development of a multidimensional culturally and socially inclusive measure of factors that support resilience: Child Resilience Questionnaire-Child report (CRQ-C)-a community-based participatory research and psychometric testing study in Australia.开发多维的文化和社会包容性的支持韧性因素测量工具:儿童韧性问卷-儿童报告(CRQ-C)——澳大利亚基于社区的参与式研究和心理测量测试研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 16;12(9):e060229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060229.
4
Does an entrepreneur run the risk of developing stress due to unsuitability as an entrepreneur? Validation of an entrepreneurship scale.企业家是否因为不适合创业而面临压力的风险?创业量表的验证。
Work. 2021;70(1):187-197. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213564.
5
Development and validation of a multidimensional, culturally and socially inclusive Child Resilience Questionnaire (parent/caregiver report) to measure factors that support resilience: a community-based participatory research and psychometric testing study in Australia.发展和验证多维的、文化和社会包容性的儿童适应力问卷(家长/照顾者报告),以衡量支持适应力的因素:基于社区的参与式研究和心理测量测试研究在澳大利亚。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):e061129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061129.
6
Development and validation of the medical professionals resilience scale.医学专业人员韧性量表的编制与验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 21;21(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06542-w.
7
A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: the modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB).英国对一种通用主观幸福感衡量标准的验证:改良后的 BBC 主观幸福感量表(BBC-SWB)。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Sep 3;11:150. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-150.
8
Development and psychometric properties of the "Suicidality: Treatment Occurring in Paediatrics (STOP) Risk and Resilience Factors Scales" in adolescents.《青少年自杀倾向:治疗中儿科(STOP)风险和恢复因素量表》的编制及心理测量学特性。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;29(2):153-165. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01328-2. Epub 2019 May 3.
9
Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community.《简要韧性量表(BRS)的因子结构、内部信度和建构效度:一项针对社区中严重精神疾病患者的研究》
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):620-645. doi: 10.1111/papt.12336. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
10
The relationship between ambulance team's professional commitment, occupational anxiety, and resilience levels.救护车团队的专业承诺、职业焦虑与韧性水平之间的关系。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11158-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and Somatic Symptom Scale-8: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.患者健康问卷-15 和躯体症状量表-8 的测量特性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446603. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46603.