Clinical Hospital of the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
28122Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Nov;36(6):780-787. doi: 10.1177/19458924221113124. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
Olfactory dysfunction (OD)-including anosmia and hyposmia-is a common symptom of COVID-19. Previous studies have identified olfactory training (OT) as an important treatment for postinfectious OD; however, little is known about its benefits and optimizations after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
This study aimed to assess whether olfactory training performance can be optimized using more fragrances over a shorter period of time in patients with persistent OD after COVID-19. In addition, we determined the presence of other variables related to OD and treatment response in this population.
This multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited 80 patients with persistent OD and prior COVID-19 infection for less than 3 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups receiving either 4 or 8 essences over 4 weeks. Subjective assessments and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) were performed before and after the treatment.
Significant olfactory improvement was measured subjectively and using the UPSIT in both groups; however, no significant differences between the groups were observed. Additionally, the presence of olfactory fluctuations was associated with higher UPSIT scores.
These data suggest that training intensification by increasing the number of essences for 4 weeks does not show superiority over the classical method. Moreover, fluctuant olfaction seems to be related to a higher score on the UPSIT.
嗅觉功能障碍(OD),包括嗅觉丧失和嗅觉减退,是 COVID-19 的常见症状。先前的研究已经确定嗅觉训练(OT)是治疗感染后 OD 的重要方法;然而,对于 SARS-CoV-2 感染后嗅觉训练的益处和优化方法知之甚少。
本研究旨在评估在 COVID-19 后持续性 OD 患者中,是否可以通过在更短的时间内使用更多的气味来优化嗅觉训练的效果。此外,我们还确定了该人群中与 OD 和治疗反应相关的其他变量的存在情况。
这是一项多中心随机临床试验,招募了 80 名有持续性 OD 且 COVID-19 感染时间少于 3 个月的患者。患者被分为接受 4 种或 8 种气味 4 周的 2 组。在治疗前后进行主观评估和宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)。
两组患者在主观和 UPSIT 测试中均有显著的嗅觉改善,但组间无显著差异。此外,嗅觉波动的存在与 UPSIT 得分较高相关。
这些数据表明,通过增加气味数量来强化训练 4 周并不比经典方法具有优势。此外,波动的嗅觉似乎与 UPSIT 上的更高分数相关。