Suppr超能文献

四种气味用于嗅觉训练已足够:一项初步研究。

Four odorants for olfactory training are enough: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Smell & Taste Clinic, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, 85354, Freising, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Dec;281(12):6445-6458. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08930-4. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Olfactory training (OT) is commonly used for the treatment of olfactory disorders. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate about the most effective OT regimen. We aimed to compare the effects of OT with 7 items (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves, stewed apple, balm, mint) to 4-item-OT (rose, lemon, eucalyptus, cloves) over 3 months. Methods: Participants were 40 patients with olfactory dysfunction receiving 4-item-OT or 7-item-OT and 60 gender- and age-matched individuals with normal sense of smell receiving no OT, 4-item-OT, or 7-item-OT. Before and after the OT we assessed n-butanol odor thresholds, discrimination, and identification (TDI score), additionalthresholds for (R)-(-)-carvone, β-damascenone, salicyclic acid benzylester, the degree of phantosmia and parosmia, cognitive function, and ratings of olfactory function. Results: In both patient groups, the TDI score increased with the use of OT, regardless of the number of odors used (p < 0.001; 3.48 ± 4.21 and lower than control groups). The clinically significant increase of 5.5 points in TDI score correlated with change of ratings of parosmia (r 0.62; p < 0.01) and with ratings of olfactory dysfunction (r = 0.51; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Concluding, OT over a 3-months period with 4 or 7 odors appears to produce similar results, although the sample size has to be considered.

摘要

背景

嗅觉训练(OT)常用于治疗嗅觉障碍。然而,对于最有效的 OT 方案仍存在争议。我们旨在比较 OT 与 7 项(玫瑰、柠檬、桉树、丁香、炖苹果、香脂、薄荷)和 4 项(玫瑰、柠檬、桉树、丁香)OT 方案在 3 个月内的效果。

方法

40 名嗅觉功能障碍患者接受 4 项或 7 项 OT,60 名性别和年龄匹配的嗅觉正常者接受 4 项、7 项或无 OT。在 OT 前后,我们评估了 n-丁醇气味阈值、辨别力和识别(TDI 评分),(R)-(-)-蒈烯、β-大马酮、水杨酸苄酯的附加阈值,幻嗅和味觉障碍的程度,认知功能和嗅觉功能评分。

结果

在两组患者中,无论使用的气味数量如何,OT 的使用都能提高 TDI 评分(p<0.001;3.48±4.21,低于对照组)。TDI 评分提高 5.5 分具有临床意义,与味觉障碍评分(r0.62;p<0.01)和嗅觉障碍评分(r=0.51;p<0.05)相关。

结论

总之,在 3 个月的时间内,4 项或 7 项气味的 OT 似乎会产生相似的结果,尽管要考虑到样本量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a9/11564259/833ab796e257/405_2024_8930_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验