Friedrich Jannis, Raab Markus, Voigt Laura
Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2025 Jan 22;89(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02076-6.
Literature on grounded cognition argues that mental representations of concepts, even abstract concepts, involve modal simulations. These modalities are typically assumed to reside within the body, such as in the sensorimotor system. A recent proposal argues that physical invariants, such as momentum or gravity, can also be substrates in which concepts can be grounded, expanding the assumed limits of grounding beyond the body. We here experimentally assessed this proposal by exploiting the representational momentum effect and the abstract concept of success. If success is grounded in the physical invariant momentum, the representational momentum effect should be larger for successful targets. We tested this hypothesis across four experiments (three pre-registered). In a surprising finding, we find hints that large trial numbers may hinder being able to find a representational momentum effect, which should be further investigated in future research. Regarding the central hypothesis, although only one experiment found statistically significant support, the effect tended toward the same direction in the three others as well. In order to draw robust conclusions about the results, we performed a mini meta, which aggregates the effects and inference statistics across the N = 271 participants. Across the four experiments, this effect was statistically significant, suggesting evidence in favor of the central hypothesis. These results should be interpreted with caution as there was inconsistency across experiments, suggesting the magnitude of the effect is small, and when asked who they believe moved faster, participants did not reliably indicate the successful target.
关于具身认知的文献认为,概念的心理表征,甚至是抽象概念,都涉及模态模拟。这些模态通常被认为存在于身体内部,比如在感觉运动系统中。最近有一项提议认为,诸如动量或重力等物理不变量也可以成为概念得以具身化的基础,从而将具身化的假定范围扩展到身体之外。我们在此通过利用表征动量效应和成功这一抽象概念,对这一提议进行了实验评估。如果成功基于物理不变量动量,那么对于成功目标而言,表征动量效应应该更大。我们在四项实验(三项预先注册)中对这一假设进行了测试。一个令人惊讶的发现是,我们发现有迹象表明大量的试验次数可能会阻碍发现表征动量效应,这一点在未来的研究中应进一步探讨。关于核心假设,虽然只有一项实验发现了具有统计学意义的支持,但在其他三项实验中效应也倾向于相同的方向。为了对结果得出可靠的结论,我们进行了一项小型元分析,汇总了N = 271名参与者的效应和推断统计量。在这四项实验中,这种效应具有统计学意义,表明有证据支持核心假设。这些结果应谨慎解读,因为实验之间存在不一致性,这表明效应的大小较小,而且当被问及他们认为谁移动得更快时,参与者并没有可靠地指出成功目标。