• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估椎骨终板与 3D 打印个体化椎间融合器和市售椎间融合器之间的接触面。

Evaluation of the contact surface between vertebral endplate and 3D printed patient-specific cage vs commercial cage.

机构信息

Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery Spine Program, London Health Science Centre, Victoria Hospital, 800 Commissioners Road E (RM A6-144), London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.

Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 22;12(1):12505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16895-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-16895-9
PMID:35869276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9307762/
Abstract

Biomechanical study. To evaluate the performance of the contact surface for 3D printed patient-specific cages using CT-scan 3D endplate reconstructions in comparison to the contact surface of commercial cages. Previous strategies to improve the surface of contact between the device and the endplate have been employed to attenuate the risk of cage subsidence. Patient-specific cages have been used to help, but only finite-element studies have evaluated the effectiveness of this approach. There is a possible mismatch between the CT-scan endplate image used to generate the cage and the real bony endplate anatomy that could limit the performance of the cages. A cadaveric model is used to investigate the possible mismatch between 3D printed patient-specific cages and the endplate and compare them to commercially available cages (Medtronic Fuse and Capstone). Contact area and contact stress were used as outcomes. When PS cage was compared to the Capstone cage, the mean contact area obtained was 100 ± 23.6 mm and 57.5 ± 13.7 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). When compared to the Fuse cage, the mean contact area was 104.8 ± 39.6 mm and 55.2 ± 35.1 mm, respectively(p < 0.001). Patient-specific cages improve the contact area between the implant and the endplate surface, reducing the contact stress and the risk of implant subsidence during LIF surgeries.

摘要

生物力学研究。评估使用 CT 扫描 3D 终板重建进行 3D 打印患者专用笼的接触面性能,与商业笼的接触面进行比较。为了降低笼下沉的风险,已经采用了多种改善设备与终板之间接触表面的策略。已经使用了患者专用笼来辅助,但只有有限元研究评估了这种方法的有效性。用于生成笼的 CT 扫描终板图像与实际骨性终板解剖结构之间可能存在不匹配,这可能会限制笼的性能。使用尸体模型来研究 3D 打印患者专用笼与终板之间可能存在的不匹配,并将其与市售笼(美敦力融合和 Capstone)进行比较。使用接触面积和接触压力作为结果。当 PS 笼与 Capstone 笼进行比较时,分别获得的平均接触面积为 100±23.6mm 和 57.5±13.7mm(p<0.001)。当与 Fuse 笼进行比较时,平均接触面积分别为 104.8±39.6mm 和 55.2±35.1mm(p<0.001)。患者专用笼可改善植入物与终板表面之间的接触面积,降低 LIF 手术中植入物下沉的接触压力和风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/70f88ee8f276/41598_2022_16895_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/8ff405310c5c/41598_2022_16895_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/ef53ae2b6c6c/41598_2022_16895_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/5054a6de3b31/41598_2022_16895_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/187bac9ec49f/41598_2022_16895_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/4b18de80e88a/41598_2022_16895_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/1cc1f4b94217/41598_2022_16895_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/70f88ee8f276/41598_2022_16895_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/8ff405310c5c/41598_2022_16895_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/ef53ae2b6c6c/41598_2022_16895_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/5054a6de3b31/41598_2022_16895_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/187bac9ec49f/41598_2022_16895_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/4b18de80e88a/41598_2022_16895_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/1cc1f4b94217/41598_2022_16895_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/9307762/70f88ee8f276/41598_2022_16895_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the contact surface between vertebral endplate and 3D printed patient-specific cage vs commercial cage.评估椎骨终板与 3D 打印个体化椎间融合器和市售椎间融合器之间的接触面。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 22;12(1):12505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16895-9.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Subsidence Between Patient-Specific and Non-Patient-Specific Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages.患者定制型与非患者定制型腰椎椎间融合器下沉的生物力学比较
Global Spine J. 2024 May;14(4):1155-1163. doi: 10.1177/21925682221134913. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.一种具有优化体晶格和微孔终板的 3D 打印多孔椎间融合器的沉降和融合性能:全面的力学和生物学分析。
Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):1028-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.腰椎终板的几何和材料特性对腰椎椎间融合失败的影响:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8.
5
[Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].使用钽植入物进行椎间盘置换的360度腰椎融合术的中期结果
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):388-93.
6
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study.不同全脊椎整块切除术假体重建的生物力学比较:有限元研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 4;23(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05919-0.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of four surgical scenarios of lumbar fusion with hyperlordotic interbody cage: A finite element study.使用前凸椎间融合器进行腰椎融合的四种手术方案的生物力学评估:一项有限元研究。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2018;29(4):485-497. doi: 10.3233/BME-181004.
8
Biomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation: a three-dimensional finite element study.有或无辅助器械的多级外侧椎间融合术的生物力学比较:一项三维有限元研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1387-6.
9
[3D printed personalized lumbar spinal fusion device design and biomechanical performance analysis].[3D打印个性化腰椎融合器的设计与生物力学性能分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Aug 25;34(8):764-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.08.014.
10
Customized design and biomechanical property analysis of 3D-printed tantalum intervertebral cages.定制设计和生物力学性能分析的 3D 打印钽椎间笼。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2024;35(2):99-124. doi: 10.3233/BME-230154.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Poor Matching of Intervertebral Fusion Devices After Posterior Vertebral Column Resection in Patients With Kyphosis or Kyphoscoliosis.脊柱后凸或脊柱侧凸患者后路椎体切除术后椎间融合器匹配不佳的危险因素。
Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2579-2587. doi: 10.1111/os.70116. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Patient-specific implants and spinal alignment outcomes.个性化植入物与脊柱排列结果。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Sep 20;20:100559. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100559. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Tomographic Assessment of Fusion Rate, Implant-Endplate Contact Area, Subsidence, and Alignment With Lumbar Personalized Interbody Implants at 1-Year Follow-Up.

本文引用的文献

1
Geometric and Volumetric Relationship Between Human Lumbar Vertebra and CT-based Models.人体腰椎与基于 CT 的模型的几何和体积关系。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Jun;28(6):e172-e181. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Does Lumbar Interbody Cage Size Influence Subsidence? A Biomechanical Study.腰椎椎间融合器大小会影响沉降吗?一项生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):88-95. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003194.
3
Interbody options in lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术中的椎间融合器选择
腰椎个性化椎间融合器术后1年随访:融合率、植入物终板接触面积、沉降及对线情况的断层扫描评估
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Aug 30;18(S1):S41-S49. doi: 10.14444/8640.
4
The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.后路腰椎融合术中使用 3D 打印(Ti6Al4V)椎间融合器的术后临床效果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038431.
5
Evolution of the Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): From Open to Percutaneous to Patient-Specific.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)的发展历程:从开放手术到经皮手术再到个体化手术。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 14;13(8):2271. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082271.
6
The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present.腰椎侧路椎间融合术的演变:从过去到现在。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 23;60(3):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030378.
7
Optimizing Spinal Fusion Cage Design to Improve Bone Substitute Filling on Varying Disc Heights: A 3D Printing Study.优化脊柱融合器设计以改善不同椎间盘高度下骨替代物的填充:一项3D打印研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;10(11):1250. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10111250.
8
Biomechanical Comparison of Subsidence Between Patient-Specific and Non-Patient-Specific Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages.患者定制型与非患者定制型腰椎椎间融合器下沉的生物力学比较
Global Spine J. 2024 May;14(4):1155-1163. doi: 10.1177/21925682221134913. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S19-S24. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.04.
4
Error Measurement Between Anatomical Porcine Spine, CT Images, and 3D Printing.解剖猪脊柱、CT 图像和 3D 打印之间的误差测量。
Acad Radiol. 2020 May;27(5):651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Design of Additively Manufactured Structures for Biomedical Applications: A Review of the Additive Manufacturing Processes Applied to the Biomedical Sector.用于生物医学应用的增材制造结构设计:应用于生物医学领域的增材制造工艺综述。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Mar 12;2019:9748212. doi: 10.1155/2019/9748212. eCollection 2019.
6
Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Review of Techniques, Indications, and Outcomes.退变性腰椎滑脱的腰椎椎间融合术:技术、适应证及疗效综述
Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):77-84. doi: 10.1177/2192568217712494. Epub 2018 May 23.
7
Effect of Dome-Shaped Titanium Mesh Cages on Cervical Endplate Under Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Biomechanics Study.穹顶形钛网笼对循环加载下颈椎终板的影响:一项体外生物力学研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jan 6;25:142-149. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911888.
8
Biomechanical Measurement Error Can Be Caused by Fujifilm Thickness: A Theoretical, Experimental, and Computational Analysis.富士胶片厚度可导致生物力学测量误差:理论、实验与计算分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4310314. doi: 10.1155/2017/4310314. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
9
Interbody Spacer Material Properties and Design Conformity for Reducing Subsidence During Lumbar Interbody Fusion.腰椎椎间融合术中减少沉降的椎间融合器材料特性与设计一致性
J Biomech Eng. 2017 May 1;139(5):0510051-8. doi: 10.1115/1.4036312.
10
Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.单节段腰椎退变疾病行前路、后路及经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:216-226. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.114. Epub 2017 Feb 9.