Faculty of Medicine of Monastir, University of Monastir, 5019, Monastir, Tunisia.
Emergency Department, Research Unit «Douleur thoracique», UR17SP09, Tahar Sfar University Hospital, 5100, Mahdia, Tunisia.
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00691-9.
The additive benefit of inhaled corticosteroid when used with systemic corticosteroid in acute asthma is still unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of high and repeated doses of inhaled budesonide when combined with the standard treatment of adult acute asthma.
It was a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study performed in the emergency department (ED) from May 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04016220). Fifty patients were included and were randomized to receive intravenous hydrocortisone hemisuccinate in association with nebulized budesonide (n = 23, budesonide group) or normal saline (n = 27, control group). Nebulization of budesonide or saline was done in combination with 5 mg of terbutaline every 20 min the first hour, then at 2 h (H2), and 3 h (H3). All patients received standard treatment. Efficacy and safety of inhaled budesonide were evaluated every 30 min for 180 min.
A significant increase in peak expiratory flow (PEF) was observed in both treatment groups at evaluation times. The increase in PEF persisted significantly compared to the previous measurement in both groups. There was no significant difference in the PEF between the two groups at evaluation times. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the evolution in the respiratory rate and heart rate. There was also no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the rate of hospitalization, the discharge criteria before the end of the protocol.
Considering its limited power, our study suggests that the association of nebulized budesonide with hydrocortisone hemisuccinate has no additional effect over the use of hydrocortisone alone in adults' acute asthma managed in the ED.
吸入性皮质类固醇在治疗急性哮喘时联合全身皮质类固醇的额外获益仍不明确。本研究旨在评估大剂量、重复吸入布地奈德混悬液联合急性成人哮喘标准治疗的效果。
这是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究,于 2010 年 5 月 1 日至 2011 年 2 月 28 日在急诊科进行(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04016220)。纳入 50 例患者,随机分为静脉注射琥珀酸氢可的松联合布地奈德混悬液雾化吸入(n=23,布地奈德组)或生理盐水(n=27,对照组)。雾化吸入布地奈德或生理盐水联合特布他林 5mg 每 20 分钟 1 次,第 1 小时共 5 次,然后第 2 小时(H2)和第 3 小时(H3)各 1 次。所有患者均接受标准治疗。每 30 分钟评估 180 分钟内吸入布地奈德的疗效和安全性。
两组治疗后即刻的呼气峰流速(PEF)均显著增加。与前一次测量相比,两组的 PEF 持续显著增加。两组在评估时间的 PEF 无显著差异。两组的呼吸频率和心率变化无显著差异。两组在住院率方面也无统计学差异,即在协议结束前出院标准。
考虑到其有限的效能,本研究表明,在急诊科管理的成人急性哮喘中,与琥珀酸氢可的松联合使用布地奈德混悬液与单独使用氢可的松相比,没有额外的效果。