Hematology and Transplant Center, University Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona", Salerno, Italy.
Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.
Eur J Haematol. 2022 Nov;109(5):483-493. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13833. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
Current chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) International Prognostic Index (IPI) stratifies patients based on clinical, molecular, and biochemical features; however, B-cell markers also influence CLL outcomes. Here, prognostic roles of CD11c, CD38, and CD49d were first evaluated, and then an immunophenotypic score was combined with CLL-IPI for risk stratification of CLL patients.
A total of 171 CLL subjects were included, and surface marker expression was assessed by flow cytometry. Levels ≥30% were chosen as cut-off of positivity to a marker; then values of 1 (for CD11c and CD38) or 3 (for CD49d) were assigned and scores determined for each patient's clone immunophenotype.
CD49d positivity was significantly associated with simultaneous expression of CD11c and/or CD38, unmutated IGHV status, and higher β2-microglobulin levels compared to those with CD49d negativity. Moreover, CD49d patients experienced a shorter progression-free survival and time to treatment. When the immunophenotypic score was combined with CLL-IPI, patients with high-risk immunophenotype had a significantly lower time-to-treatment regardless CLL-IPI.
Our results suggested clinical utility of an integrated prognostic score for better risk stratification of CLL patients. These results require further validation in prospective larger studies.
目前的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)国际预后指数(IPI)根据临床、分子和生化特征对患者进行分层;然而,B 细胞标志物也会影响 CLL 的结果。在这里,首次评估了 CD11c、CD38 和 CD49d 的预后作用,然后将免疫表型评分与 CLL-IPI 相结合,对 CLL 患者进行风险分层。
共纳入 171 例 CLL 患者,采用流式细胞术检测表面标志物表达。选择≥30%作为标志物阳性的截止值;然后为每个患者的克隆免疫表型分配 1(对于 CD11c 和 CD38)或 3(对于 CD49d)的值,并确定评分。
与 CD49d 阴性的患者相比,CD49d 阳性与同时表达 CD11c 和/或 CD38、IGHV 未突变状态和更高的β2-微球蛋白水平显著相关。此外,CD49d 患者的无进展生存期和治疗时间更短。当免疫表型评分与 CLL-IPI 相结合时,无论 CLL-IPI 如何,高风险免疫表型的患者治疗时间明显更短。
我们的结果表明,综合预后评分在更好地对 CLL 患者进行风险分层方面具有临床应用价值。这些结果需要在更大的前瞻性研究中进一步验证。