Mello Marco, Moscelli Giuseppe
School of Economics, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH, Guildford, United Kingdom.
IZA, Bonn, Germany.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2022 Aug;200:1025-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Natural disasters raise challenging trade-offs between public health safety and inalienable rights like the active involvement in political choices through voting. We exploit a quasi-experimental setting provided by multiple ballots across regions and municipalities during the Italian 2020 elections to estimate the effect of voters' turnout on the spread of COVID-19. By employing an event-study design with a two-stage Control Function strategy, we find that post-poll new COVID infections increased by an average of 1.1% for each additional percentage point of turnout. Based on these estimates and real political events, we also show through a simulation that in-person voting during a high-infection regime may have a large impact on public health outcomes, more than doubling new infections, deaths and hospitalizations. These findings suggest that policy-makers' responses to natural disasters should be flexible and contingent to the emergency severity, in order to minimize social costs for citizens.
自然灾害带来了公共卫生安全与不可剥夺权利(如通过投票积极参与政治选择)之间具有挑战性的权衡。我们利用2020年意大利选举期间各地区和城市多次投票所提供的准实验环境,来估计选民投票率对新冠病毒传播的影响。通过采用带有两阶段控制函数策略的事件研究设计,我们发现投票后,投票率每增加一个百分点,新的新冠感染病例平均增加1.1%。基于这些估计和实际政治事件,我们还通过模拟表明,在高感染时期进行现场投票可能会对公共卫生结果产生重大影响,使新感染病例、死亡和住院人数增加一倍以上。这些发现表明,政策制定者对自然灾害的应对措施应灵活且视紧急情况的严重程度而定,以便将对公民的社会成本降至最低。