• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从矛盾性别歧视的认可到心理层面的亲密伴侣暴力受害:支持亲密伴侣暴力的态度、亲密伴侣暴力正当化神话以及对心理攻击的接受所起的作用。

From Endorsement of Ambivalent Sexism to Psychological IPV Victimization: The Role of Attitudes Supportive of IPV, Legitimating Myths of IPV, and Acceptance of Psychological Aggression.

作者信息

Cinquegrana Vincenza, Marini Maddalena, Galdi Silvia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.

Center for Translational Neurophysiology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:922814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922814. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922814
PMID:35874380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9301201/
Abstract

Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has recognized psychological abuse as a precursor of physical and sexual violence in intimate relationships. However, risk factors in predicting women's psychological abuse victimization in such a context are still unclear. The goal of the present work was to investigate the role of ambivalent sexism on psychological IPV victimization, by taking into account in the same study the effect of three additional social-psychological factors: women's (i) attitudes supportive of IPV, (ii) endorsement of legitimating myths of IPV, and (iii) acceptance of psychological aggression in intimate relationships. A total of 408 Italian young women (  = 23.87; SD = 2.39) involved in non-marital heterosexual romantic relationships completed measures aimed at assessing (i) hostile and benevolent sexism, (ii) attitudes supportive of IPV, (iii) legitimating myths of IPV, (iv) prevalence of psychological abuse experienced within the last 12 months, and performed a task developed to measure, and (v) acceptance of psychological aggression in intimate relationships. Results showed that the effect of ambivalent sexism on participants' prevalence of psychological abuse was mediated by the endorsement of attitudes supportive of IPV and legitimating myths of IPV, as well as by acceptance of psychological aggression. Findings are discussed based on literature about ambivalent sexism, and attitudes and beliefs about IPV.

摘要

对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的研究已将心理虐待视为亲密关系中身体暴力和性暴力的先兆。然而,在这种情况下预测女性心理虐待受害情况的风险因素仍不明确。本研究的目的是通过在同一研究中考虑另外三个社会心理因素的影响,来调查矛盾性别歧视对亲密伴侣心理暴力受害情况的作用:女性(i)对亲密伴侣暴力的支持态度,(ii)对亲密伴侣暴力正当化神话的认可,以及(iii)对亲密关系中心理攻击的接受程度。共有408名处于非婚姻异性恋浪漫关系中的意大利年轻女性(平均年龄=23.87岁;标准差=2.39岁)完成了旨在评估(i)敌意和善意性别歧视、(ii)对亲密伴侣暴力的支持态度、(iii)亲密伴侣暴力的正当化神话、(iv)过去12个月内经历的心理虐待发生率的测量,并完成了一项用于测量(v)对亲密关系中心理攻击接受程度的任务。结果表明,矛盾性别歧视对参与者心理虐待发生率的影响是通过对亲密伴侣暴力支持态度和正当化神话的认可,以及对心理攻击的接受程度来介导的。基于关于矛盾性别歧视以及对亲密伴侣暴力的态度和信念的文献对研究结果进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/9301201/8405e74dcbb6/fpsyg-13-922814-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/9301201/8405e74dcbb6/fpsyg-13-922814-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/9301201/8405e74dcbb6/fpsyg-13-922814-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
From Endorsement of Ambivalent Sexism to Psychological IPV Victimization: The Role of Attitudes Supportive of IPV, Legitimating Myths of IPV, and Acceptance of Psychological Aggression.从矛盾性别歧视的认可到心理层面的亲密伴侣暴力受害:支持亲密伴侣暴力的态度、亲密伴侣暴力正当化神话以及对心理攻击的接受所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:922814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922814. eCollection 2022.
2
Psychological abuse is not a problem! Exploring the role of domestic violence myths in psychological revictimization.心理虐待不是问题!探究家庭暴力误区在心理二次受害中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 6;14:1228822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1228822. eCollection 2023.
3
Intimate Partner Violence and Controlling Behavior Among Male Same-Sex Relationships in China: Relationship With Ambivalent Sexism.中国男同性恋伴侣间的亲密伴侣暴力和控制行为:与矛盾性别歧视的关系。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):208-230. doi: 10.1177/0886260517724835. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
4
[French validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression scale (AMMSA) and experience of close relationships with students and perpetrators of domestic violence].[《性侵犯现代神话接受量表》(AMMSA)的法语验证以及与学生和家庭暴力施暴者亲密关系的体验]
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):554-563. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.010. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
An Exploration of the Link Between Masculinity and Endorsement of IPV Myths in American Men.探究美国男性的男子气概与对暴力侵害妇女行为神话的认可之间的联系。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):6145-6165. doi: 10.1177/0886260518818430. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Ambivalent Sexism, Alcohol Use, and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration.矛盾性别歧视、酒精使用与亲密伴侣暴力行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Jan;33(2):183-210. doi: 10.1177/0886260515604412. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
7
Judgments and Attributions of Intimate Partner Violence in China: The Role of Directionality, Gender Stereotypicality, and Ambivalent Sexism.亲密伴侣暴力在中国的判断和归因:方向性、性别刻板印象和矛盾性别歧视的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10485-10513. doi: 10.1177/08862605231172477. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Myths about Intimate Partner Violence and Moral Disengagement: An Analysis of Sociocultural Dimensions Sustaining Violence against Women.关于亲密伴侣暴力和道德脱离的误区:对维持暴力侵害妇女行为的社会文化维度的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 4;17(21):8139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218139.
9
Relationships between Ambivalent Sexism and the Five Moral Foundations in Domestic Violence: Is it a Matter of Fairness and Authority?矛盾性性别歧视与家庭暴力中五种道德基础之间的关系:这是公平与权威的问题吗?
J Psychol. 2017 Apr 3;151(3):334-344. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2017.1289145. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
10
Myths Concerning Sexual Violence Toward Women in Poland, Hungary, and Norway in the Context of System Justification Theory: The Role of Beliefs in the Biological Origins of Gender Differences and Ambivalent Sexism.关于波兰、匈牙利和挪威针对女性的性暴力的误解:基于性别差异的生物起源和矛盾性别歧视信念的系统合理化理论的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP16647-NP16669. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023487.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Cognitive Distortions in Intimate Partner Violence: An Analysis of Ideological, Relational and Sociodemographic Factors.亲密伴侣暴力中认知扭曲的预测因素:意识形态、关系及社会人口学因素分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 15;15(5):677. doi: 10.3390/bs15050677.
2
Psychological abuse is not a problem! Exploring the role of domestic violence myths in psychological revictimization.心理虐待不是问题!探究家庭暴力误区在心理二次受害中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 6;14:1228822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1228822. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Latin America: A Systematic Review.拉丁美洲针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力态度:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jul;25(3):2065-2077. doi: 10.1177/15248380231205825. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
2
When "Stay at Home" Can Be Dangerous: Data on Domestic Violence in Italy during COVID-19 Lockdown.当“居家”可能变得危险时:意大利新冠封锁期间的家庭暴力数据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8948. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178948.
3
Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Western and Southern European countries.
新冠疫情大流行期间,西欧和南欧国家的亲密伴侣暴力问题。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;31(5):1058-1063. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab093.
4
Dating Violence Victimization among Adolescents in Europe: Baseline Results from the Lights4Violence Project.欧洲青少年中的约会暴力受害情况:“点亮暴力”项目的基线结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041414.
5
Individual and societal risk factors of attitudes justifying intimate partner violence against women: a multilevel cross-sectional study.为亲密伴侣对女性实施暴力行为辩解的态度的个体和社会风险因素:一项多层次横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e037993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037993.
6
The Decision to Leave the Abusive Partner by Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence and Risk of Further Revictimization: The Role of Gratitude and Risk Perception.女性亲密伴侣暴力幸存者离开施虐伴侣的决定与再次受害风险:感激和风险感知的作用。
Violence Against Women. 2021 Jul;27(9):1232-1251. doi: 10.1177/1077801220935203. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
7
An Examination of Dating Violence Among College Student-Athletes.大学生运动员中的恋爱暴力研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):NP13275-NP13295. doi: 10.1177/0886260520905545. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
8
Measuring psychological abuse by intimate partners: Constructing a cross-cultural indicator for the Sustainable Development Goals.衡量亲密伴侣的心理虐待:构建可持续发展目标的跨文化指标。
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Mar 6;9:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100377. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
A systematic review of short and medium-term mental health outcomes in young people following sexual assault.对遭受性侵犯的年轻人短期和中期心理健康结果的系统评价。
J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2019 Dec;31(3):161-181. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2019.1665533.
10
Correlates of Persistent Victimization by Romantic Partners: A Short-Term Prospective Study.浪漫伴侣持续施加伤害的相关因素:一项短期前瞻性研究。
Violence Vict. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):243-259. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-18-00053.