Alkhalifah Ahmed S, AlSoqati Abdulaziz, Zahraa Jihad
Qatif Central Hospital, Al-Qatif, Saudi Arabia.
King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 7;10:926686. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.926686. eCollection 2022.
To assess the performance of the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) and Pediatric Index of Mortality III (PIM III) indices in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Saudi Arabia and to identify the factors affecting the observed performance.
Retrospective, single-center study using data collected from the Virtual Pediatric Systems web-based database.
King Fahad Medical City PICU, Saudi Arabia.
All pediatric patients <14 years of age admitted between 1 January 2015, and 31 December 2019.
Comparison of PRISM III and PIM III performances in predicting mortality across different age groups, disease categories, and resuscitation decision statuses.
Normality of distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Patient characteristics were compared between survivors and non-survivors. The medians and ranges were calculated for continuous data, whereas frequencies and percentages were used for nominal data. The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Chi-square test were used to compare the characteristics of survivors and non-survivors.
There was a significant difference between the predicted mortality and observed mortality in both the PRISM III and PIM III. Better discrimination was found after excluding do-not-resuscitate (DNR) patients. The worst calibration and discrimination were recorded for infants <12 months of age. The PRISM III performed significantly better in patients with metabolic/genetic and central nervous system illnesses. Non-DNR patients had a lower standardized mortality rate using the PRISM III and PIM III. The PRISM III and PIM III indices performed better in patients who died within the first week of admission.
These models had sufficient discrimination ability and poor calibration. Since they were designed for particular patient characteristics and PICUs, further testing in different environments is necessary before utilization for planning and assessing performance. Alternatively, new models could be developed which are suitable for local PICUs.
评估小儿死亡风险Ⅲ(PRISMⅢ)和小儿死亡率指数Ⅲ(PIMⅢ)在沙特阿拉伯一家三级儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中的表现,并确定影响观察到的表现的因素。
采用从虚拟儿科系统基于网络的数据库收集的数据进行回顾性单中心研究。
沙特阿拉伯法赫德国王医疗城PICU。
2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间收治的所有14岁以下儿科患者。
比较PRISMⅢ和PIMⅢ在预测不同年龄组、疾病类别和复苏决策状态下的死亡率方面的表现。
使用Kolmogorov-Smirnov和Shapiro-Wilk检验评估分布的正态性。比较幸存者和非幸存者的患者特征。连续数据计算中位数和范围,而名义数据使用频率和百分比。使用Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验比较幸存者和非幸存者的特征。
PRISMⅢ和PIMⅢ的预测死亡率与观察到的死亡率之间存在显著差异。排除不进行心肺复苏(DNR)患者后,辨别力更好。12个月以下婴儿的校准和辨别力最差。PRISMⅢ在患有代谢/遗传和中枢神经系统疾病的患者中表现明显更好。使用PRISMⅢ和PIMⅢ,非DNR患者的标准化死亡率较低。PRISMⅢ和PIMⅢ指数在入院第一周内死亡的患者中表现更好。
这些模型具有足够的辨别能力,但校准较差。由于它们是针对特定患者特征和PICU设计的,在用于规划和评估表现之前,需要在不同环境中进行进一步测试。或者,可以开发适用于当地PICU的新模型。