• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过智能手机提高强迫症患者的心理健康素养并减少污名化:一项随机对照试验方案

Enhancing mental health literacy in obsessive-compulsive disorder and reducing stigma via smartphone: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

作者信息

Chaves Antonio, Arnáez Sandra, Castilla Diana, Roncero María, García-Soriano Gemma

机构信息

Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos, Universitat de València, Avda. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.

Departamento de Psicología de la Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C. de Juan del Rosal, 14, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2022 Jul 13;29:100560. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100560. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100560
PMID:35874968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9305319/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling disorder that can be successfully treated. However, individuals with OCD do not seek or delay seeking treatment. This delay may be explained by poor mental health literacy and stigmatizing attitudes toward OCD in community. In order to work on these variables, a gamified mental health mobile application (app) called esTOCma has been developed. The purpose of this study is to describe the protocol for a study to test the efficacy of esTOCma, increasing mental health literacy and help-seeking intention, reducing the stigmatizing attitudes and social distance suffered by people with OCD, as well as the distress associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with a crossover design with two conditions (immediate-use App group versus delayed-use App group) will be conducted on a non-clinical adult sample of the community of a minimum size of 200 participants. Participants in the immediate-use App group will start using the app at baseline until completion (10 days); whereas participants in the delayed-use App group will wait 10 days, and then start using the app until completion (10 days). The outcomes will be measured at four assessment points (baseline; 10 days from baseline; and 20 days from baseline; and after 3 months). The following instruments will be administered: Attribution Questionnaire, General Help-Seeking Questionnaire, Social Distance Scale, Mental Health Literacy, Psychoeducation Questionnaire, Social Desirability Scale, Single-Item Self-esteem Scale, and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised.

DISCUSSION

This protocol presents the first study to describe a randomized control trial of a mental health app focused on changing mental health literacy, stigmatizing attitudes, social distance and help-seeking intention associated with OCD. An app intervention of these characteristics is especially relevant nowadays as the COVID-19 pandemic has increased obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity. An improvement in general knowledge about OCD and a reduction in stigma could be associated with earlier OCD detection and an increase in help-seeking intention, which could result in greater wellbeing. Moreover, normalizing intrusions and knowledge about the cognitive OCD model could serve as a protective variable in vulnerable individuals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04777292. Registered February 23, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04777292.

摘要

背景

强迫症(OCD)是一种可成功治疗的致残性疾病。然而,强迫症患者不寻求治疗或延迟寻求治疗。这种延迟可能是由于心理健康素养低下以及社区对强迫症的污名化态度所致。为了解决这些变量问题,已开发出一款名为esTOCma的游戏化心理健康移动应用程序(应用)。本研究的目的是描述一项研究方案,以测试esTOCma的疗效,提高心理健康素养和求助意愿,减少强迫症患者所遭受的污名化态度和社会距离,以及与强迫症状相关的痛苦。

方法

将对一个至少有200名参与者的社区非临床成人样本进行一项采用交叉设计的随机对照试验,设有两种条件(立即使用应用组与延迟使用应用组)。立即使用应用组的参与者将在基线时开始使用应用直至完成(10天);而延迟使用应用组的参与者将等待10天,然后开始使用应用直至完成(10天)。将在四个评估点(基线;基线后10天;基线后20天;以及3个月后)测量结果。将使用以下工具:归因问卷、一般求助问卷、社会距离量表、心理健康素养、心理教育问卷、社会期望量表、单项自尊量表和修订后的强迫观念及强迫行为量表。

讨论

本方案介绍了第一项描述针对一款心理健康应用程序的随机对照试验的研究,该应用程序旨在改变与强迫症相关的心理健康素养、污名化态度、社会距离和求助意愿。如今,随着新冠疫情增加了强迫症状和严重程度,具有这些特征的应用程序干预尤为重要。对强迫症常识的改善以及污名的减少可能与更早发现强迫症和求助意愿的增加相关,这可能会带来更大的幸福感。此外,对侵入观念和关于强迫症认知模型的知识进行正常化处理,可能对易受影响的个体起到保护作用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04777292。于2021年2月23日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04777292 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ff/9305319/3c88882976ca/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ff/9305319/3528cee5eae4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ff/9305319/218d2a370e89/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ff/9305319/3c88882976ca/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ff/9305319/3528cee5eae4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ff/9305319/218d2a370e89/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ff/9305319/3c88882976ca/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing mental health literacy in obsessive-compulsive disorder and reducing stigma via smartphone: A randomized controlled trial protocol.通过智能手机提高强迫症患者的心理健康素养并减少污名化:一项随机对照试验方案
Internet Interv. 2022 Jul 13;29:100560. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100560. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
The Effectiveness of a Cell Phone eHealth App in Changing Knowledge, Stigmatizing Attitudes, and Intention to Seek Help Associated With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Pilot Questionnaire Study.手机电子健康应用程序对改变与强迫症相关的知识、污名化态度和寻求帮助意愿的效果:试点问卷研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 29;12:e48027. doi: 10.2196/48027.
3
Can an app increase health literacy and reduce the stigma associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder? A crossover randomized controlled trial.一款应用程序能否提高健康素养并减少与强迫症相关的污名化现象?一项交叉随机对照试验。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 1;350:636-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.168. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
4
What do Spanish adolescents think about obsessive-compulsive disorder? Mental health literacy and stigma associated with symmetry/order and aggression-related symptoms.西班牙青少年如何看待强迫症?与对称性/秩序和攻击性相关症状相关的心理健康素养和污名。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Apr;250:193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.080. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
5
Can Brief, Daily Training Using a Mobile App Help Change Maladaptive Beliefs? Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.简短、每日使用移动应用程序训练能否改变适应不良的信念?交叉随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 13;7(2):e11443. doi: 10.2196/11443.
6
Memantine for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Protocol for a Pragmatic, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Monocenter Trial.美金刚用于难治性强迫症:一项实用、双盲、随机、平行组、安慰剂对照、单中心试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 May 11;12:e39223. doi: 10.2196/39223.
7
Personalized exposure and experience sampling method feedback versus exposure as usual for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.个性化暴露和经验采样方法反馈与强迫症的常规暴露比较:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jan 12;25(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07780-5.
8
A mobile app to challenge obsessional beliefs in adolescents: a protocol of a two-armed, parallel randomized controlled trial.一款用于挑战青少年强迫观念的手机应用:一项双臂、平行随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 9;24(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05735-x.
9
Therapist-Assisted Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Progressive Relaxation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.治疗师辅助的基于互联网的认知行为疗法与渐进性放松疗法治疗强迫症:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 8;20(8):e242. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9566.
10
Cognitive Training via a Mobile Application to Reduce Obsessive-Compulsive-Related Distress and Cognitions During the COVID-19 Outbreaks: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Subclinical Cohort.通过移动应用程序进行认知训练以减轻 COVID-19 爆发期间与强迫症相关的痛苦和认知:使用亚临床队列的随机对照试验。
Behav Ther. 2022 Sep;53(5):776-792. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale - Proxy Report (BACE-PR): Evidence of Reliability and Validity for Caregivers Reporting on Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Concerns in Greece.获得医疗服务障碍评估量表 - 代理报告(BACE-PR):希腊照顾者报告有心理健康问题的儿童和青少年的信效度证据
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01466-7.
2
The mediating role of depressive symptoms in the relationship between health literacy and suicide-related behaviors in middle school students.抑郁症状在中学生健康素养与自杀相关行为关系中的中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17914. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02868-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Uptake and effectiveness of a self-guided mobile app platform for college student mental health.一款针对大学生心理健康的自助式移动应用程序平台的接受度与有效性
Internet Interv. 2021 Dec 24;27:100493. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100493. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Help-Seeking Intention in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Predictors and Barriers in South Africa.强迫症中的求助意愿:南非的预测因素与障碍
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 24;12:733773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.733773. eCollection 2021.
3
Teachers' Knowledge and Stigmatizing Attitudes Associated With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Effectiveness of a Brief Educational Intervention.
Fighting against self-stigma in adults with self-reported diagnosis of OCD: A single-arm pilot study using a mobile app-based intervention.
对自我报告诊断为强迫症的成年人进行自我污名化抗争:一项使用基于移动应用程序干预的单臂试点研究。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Sep;64(3):788-805. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12537. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
4
Acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD-NET): a naturalistic pilot trial during the COVID-19 pandemic in a psychiatric outpatient department in Germany.基于互联网的强迫症认知行为疗法(OCD-NET)的可接受性、可行性和有效性:德国一家精神科门诊部在新冠疫情期间进行的一项自然主义试点试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06519-7.
5
Assessment of Public Stigma, Mental Health Literacy, and Help-Seeking Intentions Based on Different Dimensions of Obsessive-Compulsive Content: A Study of the Spanish Mental Health-Naïve Population.基于强迫症内容不同维度的公众污名、心理健康素养及求助意向评估:一项针对西班牙未接触过心理健康问题人群的研究
Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70159. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70159.
6
Online Mental Health Peer-support Forums for Youth: An Exploratory Study on Stakeholder Perspectives.青少年在线心理健康同伴支持论坛:利益相关者视角的探索性研究
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Aug 18:02537176241265558. doi: 10.1177/02537176241265558.
7
Mental health literacy for public employees.公众雇员的心理健康素养。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2593. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19937-1.
8
A mobile app to challenge obsessional beliefs in adolescents: a protocol of a two-armed, parallel randomized controlled trial.一款用于挑战青少年强迫观念的手机应用:一项双臂、平行随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 9;24(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05735-x.
9
The Effectiveness of a Cell Phone eHealth App in Changing Knowledge, Stigmatizing Attitudes, and Intention to Seek Help Associated With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Pilot Questionnaire Study.手机电子健康应用程序对改变与强迫症相关的知识、污名化态度和寻求帮助意愿的效果:试点问卷研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 29;12:e48027. doi: 10.2196/48027.
10
Obsessional intrusive thoughts in children: An interview based study.儿童强迫性思维:基于访谈的研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2023 Mar;96(1):249-262. doi: 10.1111/papt.12437. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
教师对强迫症的认知及污名化态度:一项简短教育干预的效果
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 2;12:677567. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.677567. eCollection 2021.
4
How is COVID-19 affecting patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder? A longitudinal study on the initial phase of the pandemic in a Spanish cohort.COVID-19 如何影响强迫症患者?一项针对西班牙队列在大流行初始阶段的纵向研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 8;64(1):e45. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2214.
5
How is the COVID-19 pandemic affecting individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms?COVID-19 大流行如何影响有强迫症(OCD)症状的个体?
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Jun;81:102410. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102410. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Is context a crucial factor in distinguishing between intrusions and obsessions in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder?在强迫症患者中,情境是否是区分侵入性思维和强迫观念的关键因素?
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar;77(3):804-817. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23060. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
The COVID-19 pandemic: The 'black swan' for mental health care and a turning point for e-health.新冠疫情:心理健康护理的“黑天鹅”与电子健康的转折点。
Internet Interv. 2020 Apr;20:100317. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
8
Smartphone Apps for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: Systematic Review.智能手机应用程序治疗精神障碍:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 2;8(4):e14897. doi: 10.2196/14897.
9
Serious Games, Gamification, and Serious Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.严肃游戏、游戏化与严重精神疾病:范围综述。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Feb 1;71(2):170-183. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800567. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
Duration of untreated illness and response to SRI treatment in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.未治疗疾病持续时间和 SRI 治疗对强迫症的反应。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 May;58:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Feb 11.