Chaves Antonio, Arnáez Sandra, Roncero María, García-Soriano Gemma
Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 2;12:677567. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.677567. eCollection 2021.
Because children and adolescents are vulnerable to developing obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), classroom teachers play an important role in the early identification and intervention in students with OCD. The present study aims to explore the recognition of OCD, general knowledge about this disorder, implications in the classroom, and stigmatizing attitudes among teachers, as well as the effectiveness of a brief educational intervention about OCD. Participants ( = 95; mean age = 43. 29 years old; 64.3% female) were primary and secondary school teachers who were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. All of them completed a set of self-report questionnaires, read an educational fact sheet (either about OCD in the experimental group or about a healthy diet in the control group), and again completed the questionnaires. Results show that prior to the intervention, most of the teachers identified the contamination and order OCD symptoms described in a vignette as specific to OCD (82.1%) and would recommend talking about the problem (98.9%) and seeking help (94.7%). However, only a few (36.8%) knew about the most effective OCD treatments or identified compulsions as a main OCD symptom (33%). Moreover, only about half of the teachers correctly identified OCD's possible interference in classroom routines, such as delays to achieve perfection or concentration problems, and strategies for dealing with OCD, such as continuing with the class rhythm. Stigma levels were from low to moderate. After the brief educational intervention, participants in the experimental group increased their knowledge about OCD, improved their strategies for managing a student with OCD symptoms, and had fewer stigmatizing attitudes associated with pity ( < 0.05). These changes were not observed in the control group. We can conclude that this brief and easy-to-administer intervention is an effective educational intervention to significantly improve teachers' knowledge and attitudes, at least in the short-term. These results are especially relevant because OCD is associated with high interference and long delays in seeking treatment, and teachers have a unique opportunity to help with prevention, early identification, and recommending an adequate intervention for OCD.
由于儿童和青少年易患强迫症(OCD),课堂教师在早期识别和干预患有强迫症的学生方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在探讨教师对强迫症的认知、关于这种疾病的一般知识、在课堂中的影响以及对强迫症的污名化态度,以及关于强迫症的简短教育干预的效果。参与者(n = 95;平均年龄 = 43.29岁;64.3%为女性)是中小学教师,他们被随机分配到实验组或对照组。他们都完成了一套自我报告问卷,阅读了一份教育资料单(实验组是关于强迫症,对照组是关于健康饮食),然后再次完成问卷。结果显示,在干预之前,大多数教师将一个案例描述中的污染和秩序强迫症症状识别为强迫症特有的症状(82.1%),并会建议谈论这个问题(98.9%)和寻求帮助(94.7%)。然而,只有少数人(36.8%)知道最有效的强迫症治疗方法,或者将强迫行为识别为强迫症的主要症状(33%)。此外,只有大约一半的教师正确识别出强迫症可能对课堂常规产生的干扰,比如为追求完美而导致的拖延或注意力不集中问题,以及应对强迫症的策略,比如保持课堂节奏。污名化程度为低到中度。经过简短的教育干预后,实验组的参与者增加了他们对强迫症的知识,改进了管理有强迫症症状学生的策略,并且与怜悯相关的污名化态度减少了(p < 0.05)。对照组未观察到这些变化。我们可以得出结论,这种简短且易于实施的干预是一种有效的教育干预措施,至少在短期内能显著提高教师的知识和态度。这些结果尤其重要,因为强迫症与高干扰性和寻求治疗的长期延迟相关,而教师有独特的机会帮助预防、早期识别并推荐适当的强迫症干预措施。