Doukani Asmae, Free Caroline, Araya Ricardo, Michelson Daniel, Cerga-Pashoja Arlinda, Kakuma Ritsuko
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jul 25;8(4):e142. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.546.
Digital technologies have been widely acknowledged as a potentially useful resource for increasing mental healthcare access. The working alliance is a key influence on outcomes in conventional psychotherapy, but little is known about therapists' experiences of forming an effective working alliance in blended interventions that involve in-person psychotherapy and a digital programme.
To investigate psychological well-being practitioners' (PWPs') experiences of the working alliance in a trial of blended cognitive-behavioural therapy (b-CBT) for depression. Trial registration ISRCTN12388725.
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 13 PWPs who delivered b-CBT in a two-arm, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of b-CBT compared with face-to-face CBT. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
Participants reported four facilitating factors when building and maintaining a working alliance in b-CBT: having more time to deliver treatment, access to a wider toolkit, capacity to tailor components of b-CBT and receiving appropriate training and support. Participants also identified four barriers to building and maintaining a working alliance: time and resource constraints, usability challenges, limited flexibility to tailor the digital programme to patients' needs and lack of confidence in delivering b-CBT.
Our study is the first specifically to investigate practitioners' perceived facilitators and barriers to forming a working alliance in b-CBT for depression. Findings suggest that PWPs' experiences of the working alliance can be improved by: accounting for the time required to deliver b-CBT in service workflows to reduce time pressures; increasing opportunities to tailor the digital programme through offering transdiagnostic tools and adaptable features; and providing appropriate b-CBT training and technical support.
数字技术已被广泛认为是增加心理保健可及性的潜在有用资源。工作联盟是传统心理治疗结果的关键影响因素,但对于治疗师在涉及面对面心理治疗和数字程序的混合干预中形成有效工作联盟的经验知之甚少。
在一项针对抑郁症的混合认知行为疗法(b-CBT)试验中,调查心理健康从业者(PWPs)对工作联盟的体验。试验注册号:ISRCTN12388725。
对13名在双臂非劣效随机对照试验中提供b-CBT的PWPs进行了半结构化定性访谈,该试验比较了b-CBT与面对面CBT的有效性。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。
参与者报告了在b-CBT中建立和维持工作联盟的四个促进因素:有更多时间提供治疗、能够使用更广泛的工具包、能够定制b-CBT的组成部分以及获得适当的培训和支持。参与者还确定了建立和维持工作联盟的四个障碍:时间和资源限制、可用性挑战、根据患者需求定制数字程序的灵活性有限以及对提供b-CBT缺乏信心。
我们的研究首次专门调查了从业者在针对抑郁症的b-CBT中形成工作联盟的感知促进因素和障碍。研究结果表明,通过以下方式可以改善PWPs对工作联盟的体验:在服务工作流程中考虑提供b-CBT所需的时间以减轻时间压力;通过提供跨诊断工具和可适应功能增加定制数字程序的机会;以及提供适当的b-CBT培训和技术支持。