Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210110. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0110. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
Human joint action is inherently cooperative, manifested in the collaborative efforts of participants to minimize communicative trouble through interactive repair. Although interactive repair requires sophisticated cognitive abilities, it can be dissected into basic building blocks shared with non-human animal species. A review of the primate literature shows that interactionally contingent signal sequences are at least common among species of non-human great apes, suggesting a gradual evolution of repair. To pioneer a cross-species assessment of repair this paper aims at (i) identifying necessary precursors of human interactive repair; (ii) proposing a coding framework for its comparative study in humans and non-human species; and (iii) using this framework to analyse examples of interactions of humans (adults/children) and non-human great apes. We hope this paper will serve as a primer for cross-species comparisons of communicative breakdowns and how they are repaired. This article is part of the theme issue 'Revisiting the human 'interaction engine': comparative approaches to social action coordination'.
人类的联合行动本质上是合作的,表现在参与者通过互动修复来共同努力,最大限度地减少交流障碍。虽然互动修复需要复杂的认知能力,但它可以分解为与非人类动物物种共享的基本构建块。对灵长类动物文献的回顾表明,交互条件信号序列至少在非人类大猿物种中是常见的,这表明修复是逐渐进化而来的。为了开创一种跨物种的修复评估,本文旨在:(i)确定人类互动修复的必要前提;(ii)提出一个比较人类和非人类物种修复的编码框架;(iii)使用该框架分析人类(成人/儿童)和非人类大猿互动的例子。我们希望本文将成为跨物种比较交际失败及其修复方法的入门指南。本文是主题为“重新审视人类的‘互动引擎’:社会行为协调的比较方法”的一部分。