Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;28(8):1559-1568. doi: 10.3201/eid2808.211787.
Ribavirin has been used widely to treat Lassa fever in West Africa since the 1980s. However, few studies have systematically appraised the evidence for its use. We conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished literature retrieved from electronic databases and gray literature from inception to March 8, 2022. We identified 13 studies of the comparative effectiveness of ribavirin versus no ribavirin treatment on mortality outcomes, including unpublished data from a study in Sierra Leone provided through a US Freedom of Information Act request. Although ribavirin was associated with decreased mortality rates, results of these studies were at critical or serious risk for bias when appraised using the ROBINS-I tool. Important risks for bias related to lack of control for confounders, immortal time bias, and missing outcome data. Robust evidence supporting the use of ribavirin in Lassa fever is lacking. Well-conducted clinical trials to elucidate the effectiveness of ribavirin for Lassa fever are needed.
利巴韦林自 20 世纪 80 年代以来在西非被广泛用于治疗拉沙热。然而,很少有研究系统地评估其使用的证据。我们对从电子数据库和灰色文献中检索到的已发表和未发表的文献进行了系统评价,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 3 月 8 日。我们确定了 13 项关于利巴韦林与不使用利巴韦林治疗对死亡率结果的比较效果的研究,包括通过美国信息自由法案请求从塞拉利昂的一项研究中获得的未发表数据。尽管利巴韦林与降低死亡率相关,但使用 ROBINS-I 工具评估这些研究的结果时,其存在严重偏倚的风险。偏倚的重要风险与缺乏混杂因素的控制、不朽时间偏倚和缺失结局数据有关。缺乏支持利巴韦林在拉沙热中应用的有力证据。需要进行精心设计的临床试验来阐明利巴韦林治疗拉沙热的效果。