• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气体视网膜固定术。首批100例病例的联合报告。

Pneumatic retinopexy. A collaborative report of the first 100 cases.

作者信息

Hilton G F, Kelly N E, Salzano T C, Tornambe P E, Wells J W, Wendel R T

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1987 Apr;94(4):307-14.

PMID:3587909
Abstract

The preliminary experience of one surgeon, using pneumatic retinopexy for 20 consecutive cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, was previously reported. The collaborative experience of six surgeons using pneumatic retinopexy for 100 cases is now reported. This series includes cases with pseudophakia, aphakia, macular detachment, macular breaks, vitreous hemorrhage, trauma, and old detachments. Initially, 91% were reattached, but seven recurrences yielded a 6-month follow-up cure rate of 84% with pneumatic retinopexy. With subsequent scleral buckling, 98% were reattached. Postoperative complications included proliferative vitreoretinopathy (3%), macular pucker (3%), and new/missed retinal breaks (7%). A review of the literature disclosed postoperative new/missed retinal breaks in nine series: 21, 3, 8, 4, 9, 7, 5, 4, and 13%. There were no cases of glaucoma, cataract, subretinal gas, endophthalmitis, or extension of the detachment into a previously attached macula. Pneumatic retinopexy offers the advantages of reduced tissue trauma, fewer complications, no hospitalization, and less expense. The major disadvantage is the need for postoperative positioning.

摘要

此前曾报道过一位外科医生连续对20例孔源性视网膜脱离患者进行气体视网膜固定术的初步经验。现将六位外科医生对100例患者进行气体视网膜固定术的协作经验报告如下。该系列病例包括人工晶状体眼、无晶状体眼、黄斑脱离、黄斑裂孔、玻璃体积血、外伤及陈旧性视网膜脱离。最初,91%的患者视网膜复位,但有7例复发,气体视网膜固定术6个月随访治愈率为84%。随后行巩膜扣带术后,98%的患者视网膜复位。术后并发症包括增生性玻璃体视网膜病变(3%)、黄斑皱襞(3%)以及新出现/遗漏的视网膜裂孔(7%)。文献回顾显示,九个系列报道的术后新出现/遗漏视网膜裂孔的发生率分别为:21%、3%、8%、4%、9%、7%、5%、4%和13%。未出现青光眼、白内障、视网膜下气体、眼内炎或视网膜脱离扩展至先前已复位的黄斑区的病例。气体视网膜固定术具有组织创伤小、并发症少、无需住院及费用较低等优点。其主要缺点是术后需要体位固定。

相似文献

1
Pneumatic retinopexy. A collaborative report of the first 100 cases.气体视网膜固定术。首批100例病例的联合报告。
Ophthalmology. 1987 Apr;94(4):307-14.
2
Pneumatic retinopexy: the evolution of case selection and surgical technique. A twelve-year study of 302 eyes.气体视网膜固定术:病例选择与手术技术的演变。对302只眼的12年研究。
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1997;95:551-78.
3
Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Southern Wisconsin Pneumatic Retinopexy Study Group.原发性孔源性视网膜脱离治疗中气体视网膜固定术与巩膜扣带术的比较。南威斯康星气体视网膜固定术研究组。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;126(5):658-68. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00181-0.
4
Pneumatic retinopexy: principles and practice.气体视网膜固定术:原理与实践
Indian J Ophthalmol. 1996 Sep;44(3):131-43.
5
Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments.无巩膜扣带的平坦部玻璃体切除术治疗人工晶状体眼视网膜脱离
Ophthalmology. 1999 Sep;106(9):1811-5; discussion 1816. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90353-6.
6
Laser pneumatic retinopexy for repair of recurrent retinal detachment after failed scleral buckle--ten years experience.激光气泵视网膜固定术治疗巩膜扣带术失败后的复发性视网膜脱离——十年经验
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2001 Jan-Feb;32(1):13-8.
7
RESCUE PNEUMATIC RETINOPEXY IN PATIENTS WITH FAILED PRIMARY RETINAL DETACHMENT SURGERY.原发性视网膜脱离手术失败患者的挽救性气体视网膜固定术
Retina. 2015 Sep;35(9):1851-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000546.
8
Pneumatic retinopexy in the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.气体视网膜固定术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离
Eye (Lond). 1999 Dec;13 ( Pt 6):725-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.1999.216.
9
Outcomes and complications of pneumatic retinopexy over a 12-year period.12年期间气体视网膜固定术的治疗效果及并发症
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2014 Mar-Apr;45(2):132-7. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20140306-06.
10
Retinal detachment after primary pneumatic retinopexy.原发性气体视网膜固定术后视网膜脱离
Retina. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(10):1474-8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181ae70f3.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-Crosslinked Betaine-Based Amphiphilic Hydrogel as a Promising Vitreous Substitute: Anti-Adhesion, Anti-Fouling, and Anti-Cell Proliferation.基于双交联甜菜碱的两亲性水凝胶作为一种有前景的玻璃体替代物:抗粘连、抗污染和抗细胞增殖
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Sep;12(36):e13455. doi: 10.1002/advs.202413455. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
In-Office Suprachoroidal Viscopexy for Acute Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.用于急性孔源性视网膜脱离的门诊脉络膜上腔黏弹固定术
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 1;143(1):53-60. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5202.
3
Performance of Automated Machine Learning in Predicting Outcomes of Pneumatic Retinopexy.
自动机器学习在预测气体视网膜固定术结果中的表现
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Jan 19;4(5):100470. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100470. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
4
Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy.气体视网膜固定术失败后巩膜扣带术的结果
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023 Dec 23;8(2):131-137. doi: 10.1177/24741264231216795. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
5
Pneumatic Retinopexy: An Experience of 12 Years at a Tertiary Care Hospital.气体视网膜固定术:一家三级护理医院的12年经验
Cureus. 2023 Sep 29;15(9):e46180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46180. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Assessment of Postural Compliance After Pneumatic Retinopexy.气体视网膜固定术后体位依从性评估
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 May 2;8(3):4. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.3.4. eCollection 2019 May.
7
Advances in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.孔源性视网膜脱离的治疗进展
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 18;12(4):660-667. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.04.22. eCollection 2019.
8
Anatomic, Visual, and Financial Outcomes for Traditional and Nontraditional Primary Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment.传统和非传统原发性气动巩膜外冷凝术治疗视网膜脱离的解剖学、视觉和财务结果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;200:187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
9
Comparison of Pneumatic Retinopexy and Scleral Buckle for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair.原发性孔源性视网膜脱离修复术中巩膜扣带术与气体视网膜固定术的比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Nov 1;48(11):887-893. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20171030-03.
10
PNEUMATIC RETINOPEXY IN RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.孔源性视网膜脱离的气体视网膜固定术
Med J Armed Forces India. 1997 Oct;53(4):255-258. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30747-5. Epub 2017 Jun 26.