Cáceres Sepúlveda Geraldine, Ochoa Silvia, Thibault Jules
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
SIDCOP Research Group-Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Chem Prod Process Model. 2020 Aug 15;17(1):29-53. doi: 10.1515/cppm-2020-0012. eCollection 2022 Feb 1.
Due to the highly competitive market and increasingly stringent environmental regulations, it is paramount to operate chemical processes at their optimal point. In a typical process, there are usually many process variables (decision variables) that need to be selected in order to achieve a set of optimal objectives for which the process will be considered to operate optimally. Because some of the objectives are often contradictory, Multi-objective optimization (MOO) can be used to find a suitable trade-off among all objectives that will satisfy the decision maker. The first step is to circumscribe a well-defined Pareto domain, corresponding to the portion of the solution domain comprised of a large number of non-dominated solutions. The second step is to rank all Pareto-optimal solutions based on some preferences of an expert of the process, this step being performed using visualization tools and/or a ranking algorithm. The last step is to implement the best solution to operate the process optimally. In this paper, after reviewing the main methods to solve MOO problems and to select the best Pareto-optimal solution, four simple MOO problems will be solved to clearly demonstrate the wealth of information on a given process that can be obtained from the MOO instead of a single aggregate objective. The four optimization case studies are the design of a PI controller, an SO to SO reactor, a distillation column and an acrolein reactor. Results of these optimization case studies show the benefit of generating and using the Pareto domain to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying relationships between the various process variables and performance objectives.
由于市场竞争激烈以及环境法规日益严格,在最佳状态下运行化学过程至关重要。在一个典型的过程中,通常有许多过程变量(决策变量)需要选择,以便实现一组最优目标,在此状态下该过程将被视为最优运行。由于某些目标往往相互矛盾,多目标优化(MOO)可用于在所有目标之间找到合适的权衡点,以满足决策者的需求。第一步是划定一个定义明确的帕累托域,它对应于由大量非支配解组成的解域部分。第二步是根据过程专家的一些偏好对所有帕累托最优解进行排序,此步骤使用可视化工具和/或排序算法来执行。最后一步是实施最佳解决方案以使过程最优运行。在本文中,在回顾了解决多目标优化问题和选择最佳帕累托最优解的主要方法之后,将解决四个简单的多目标优化问题,以清楚地展示从多目标优化而非单一总体目标中可以获得的关于给定过程的丰富信息。这四个优化案例研究分别是PI控制器的设计、SO到SO反应器、精馏塔和丙烯醛反应器。这些优化案例研究的结果表明了生成和使用帕累托域以更深入理解各种过程变量与性能目标之间潜在关系的好处。