• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察草的生长:休闲大麻合法化会影响零售和农业工资吗?

Watching the grass grow: does recreational cannabis legalization affect retail and agricultural wages?

作者信息

Jiang Sichao, Miller Keaton

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, 97403, OR, USA.

出版信息

J Cannabis Res. 2022 Jul 26;4(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s42238-022-00149-6.

DOI:10.1186/s42238-022-00149-6
PMID:35883137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9316823/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past several years, cannabis has become legal for recreational use in many US states and jurisdictions around the world. The opening of these markets has led to the establishment of hundreds of cannabis production and retail firms with accompanying demand for labor, leading to concerns about spillover effects on wages from incumbents.

METHODS

We study the markets for agricultural and retail labor in Washington and Colorado from 2000 to 2019 using differences-in-differences with synthetic controls. We employ employment data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, state-level demographic data from the US Census Bureau, and agricultural data from the National Agricultural Statistics Service. We use the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) for variable selection and classification and regression trees (CART) for chained imputation of missing values.

RESULTS

We find little-to-no evidence of a significant difference in weekly wages per worker generated by cannabis legalization: the log of the weekly wage per worker decreases by 0.013 in Washington's agricultural sector (p value 0.091) and increases by 0.059 in Washington's retail sector (p value 0.606). Results in Colorado are qualitatively similar. These results are limited in part by the short post-legalization period of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis legalization is unlikely to negatively impact incumbent agriculture or retail firms through the labor market channel.

摘要

背景

在过去几年里,大麻在美国许多州以及世界上其他一些司法管辖区已被合法化用于娱乐用途。这些市场的开放导致了数百家大麻生产和零售公司的成立,随之而来的是对劳动力的需求,这引发了人们对现有企业工资溢出效应的担忧。

方法

我们使用合成控制法的差分法,研究了2000年至2019年华盛顿州和科罗拉多州的农业和零售劳动力市场。我们采用了就业与工资季度普查的就业数据、美国人口普查局的州级人口数据以及国家农业统计局的农业数据。我们使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)进行变量选择和分类,并使用分类与回归树(CART)对缺失值进行链式插补。

结果

我们发现几乎没有证据表明大麻合法化导致每名工人的周工资有显著差异:在华盛顿州的农业部门,每名工人周工资的对数下降了0.013(p值为0.091),而在华盛顿州的零售部门则上升了0.059(p值为0.606)。科罗拉多州的结果在性质上相似。这些结果部分受到数据合法化后时间段较短的限制。

结论

大麻合法化不太可能通过劳动力市场渠道对现有农业或零售企业产生负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/315633c72560/42238_2022_149_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/3fcebdad52cb/42238_2022_149_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/a461e329dd67/42238_2022_149_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/de86290f9ae0/42238_2022_149_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/6574b0766bd6/42238_2022_149_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/5725b4f0a92c/42238_2022_149_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/6c0972ccd01f/42238_2022_149_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/29df99532656/42238_2022_149_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/37bacf1bfb45/42238_2022_149_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/862c7f517fbb/42238_2022_149_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/bcc48e03201a/42238_2022_149_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/fb15e819bb5f/42238_2022_149_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/4960bd683695/42238_2022_149_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/c3180111a9e4/42238_2022_149_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/907c802ac70f/42238_2022_149_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/0307438d478a/42238_2022_149_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/7e6cc7d70ae5/42238_2022_149_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/e0aa6a8f9193/42238_2022_149_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/8b37b880a982/42238_2022_149_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/380621a61e01/42238_2022_149_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/315633c72560/42238_2022_149_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/3fcebdad52cb/42238_2022_149_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/a461e329dd67/42238_2022_149_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/de86290f9ae0/42238_2022_149_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/6574b0766bd6/42238_2022_149_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/5725b4f0a92c/42238_2022_149_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/6c0972ccd01f/42238_2022_149_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/29df99532656/42238_2022_149_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/37bacf1bfb45/42238_2022_149_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/862c7f517fbb/42238_2022_149_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/bcc48e03201a/42238_2022_149_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/fb15e819bb5f/42238_2022_149_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/4960bd683695/42238_2022_149_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/c3180111a9e4/42238_2022_149_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/907c802ac70f/42238_2022_149_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/0307438d478a/42238_2022_149_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/7e6cc7d70ae5/42238_2022_149_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/e0aa6a8f9193/42238_2022_149_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/8b37b880a982/42238_2022_149_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/380621a61e01/42238_2022_149_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d775/9316823/315633c72560/42238_2022_149_Fig20_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Watching the grass grow: does recreational cannabis legalization affect retail and agricultural wages?观察草的生长:休闲大麻合法化会影响零售和农业工资吗?
J Cannabis Res. 2022 Jul 26;4(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s42238-022-00149-6.
2
Collisions and cannabis: Measuring the effect of recreational marijuana legalization on traffic crashes in Washington State.碰撞与大麻:评估华盛顿州娱乐大麻合法化对交通事故的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):527-535. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2220853. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
The supply-side effects of cannabis legalization.大麻合法化的供应侧效应。
J Cannabis Res. 2022 Jul 22;4(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42238-022-00148-7.
4
Cannabis Retail Market Indicators in Five Legal States in the United States: A Public Health Perspective.美国五个合法州的大麻零售市场指标:公共卫生视角。
Clin Ther. 2023 Aug;45(8):778-786. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
5
Changes in California cannabis exposures following recreational legalization and the COVID-19 pandemic.加利福尼亚州娱乐用大麻合法化和 COVID-19 大流行后大麻暴露情况的变化。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 May;60(5):632-638. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.2006212. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
6
Employment and Marijuana Use Among Washington State Adolescents Before and After Legalization of Retail Marijuana.华盛顿州青少年在大麻零售店合法化前后的就业和大麻使用情况。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jul;65(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.027. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Despair and hope: Is the retail community pharmacy workforce in danger of becoming a monopsony labor market?绝望与希望:零售社区药剂师劳动力市场是否有成为买方垄断劳动力市场的危险?
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024 May-Jun;64(3):102039. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
8
Big data on a big new market: Insights from Washington State's legal cannabis market.大数据在新兴大市场:来自华盛顿州合法大麻市场的洞察。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.031. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
State Cannabis Legalization and Psychosis-Related Health Care Utilization.州层面的大麻合法化与精神病相关的医疗保健利用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2252689. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52689.
10
Consumer perceptions of 'legal' and 'illegal' cannabis in US states with legal cannabis sales.在美国合法销售大麻的州,消费者对“合法”和“非法”大麻的认知。
Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106563. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106563. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Marijuana legalization and disability claiming.大麻合法化与残疾申报。
Health Econ. 2021 Feb;30(2):453-469. doi: 10.1002/hec.4190. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials.整体是否大于其部分之和?随机对照试验中缺失数据填补对经济评价的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):717-728. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01166-z. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
3
Medical marijuana and workers' compensation claiming.医用大麻与工伤赔偿申报。
Health Econ. 2020 Apr;29(4):419-434. doi: 10.1002/hec.3992. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
Early evidence of the impact of cannabis legalization on cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and the use of other substances: Findings from state policy evaluations.大麻合法化对大麻使用、大麻使用障碍和其他物质使用影响的早期证据:州政策评估结果。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):644-663. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1669626. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
How will cannabis legalization affect health, safety, and social equity outcomes? It largely depends on the 14 Ps.大麻合法化将如何影响健康、安全和社会公平结果?这在很大程度上取决于 14 个 P。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):664-672. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1611841. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Health and Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.医疗大麻法律对老年人健康和劳动力供应的影响:来自健康与退休研究的证据。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2019;38(2):455-80.
7
Recreational marijuana legalization and college student use: Early evidence.休闲大麻合法化与大学生使用情况:早期证据
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Aug 3;3:649-657. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.08.001. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
Crash Fatality Rates After Recreational Marijuana Legalization in Washington and Colorado.华盛顿州和科罗拉多州娱乐用大麻合法化后的车祸死亡率。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1329-1331. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303848. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Changes in undergraduates' marijuana, heavy alcohol and cigarette use following legalization of recreational marijuana use in Oregon.俄勒冈娱乐用大麻合法化后本科生吸食大麻、酗酒和吸烟情况的变化。
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):1992-2001. doi: 10.1111/add.13906. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
Evaluating South Africa's tobacco control policy using a synthetic control method.使用合成控制法评估南非的烟草控制政策。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):509-517. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053011. Epub 2016 Sep 6.