Jansen Philipp, Baguer Daniel Otero, Duschner Nicole, Le'Clerc Arrastia Jean, Schmidt Maximilian, Wiepjes Bettina, Schadendorf Dirk, Hadaschik Eva, Maass Peter, Schaller Jörg, Griewank Klaus Georg
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 20;14(14):3518. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143518.
Background: Some of the most common cutaneous neoplasms are Bowen’s disease and seborrheic keratosis, a malignant and a benign proliferation, respectively. These entities represent a significant fraction of a dermatopathologists’ workload, and in some cases, histological differentiation may be challenging. The potential of deep learning networks to distinguish these diseases is assessed. Methods: In total, 1935 whole-slide images from three institutions were scanned on two different slide scanners. A U-Net-based segmentation deep learning algorithm was trained on data from one of the centers to differentiate Bowen’s disease, seborrheic keratosis, and normal tissue, learning from annotations performed by dermatopathologists. Optimal thresholds for the class distinction of diagnoses were extracted and assessed on a test set with data from all three institutions. Results: We aimed to diagnose Bowen’s diseases with the highest sensitivity. A good performance was observed across all three centers, underlining the model’s robustness. In one of the centers, the distinction between Bowen’s disease and all other diagnoses was achieved with an AUC of 0.9858 and a sensitivity of 0.9511. Seborrheic keratosis was detected with an AUC of 0.9764 and a sensitivity of 0.9394. Nevertheless, distinguishing irritated seborrheic keratosis from Bowen’s disease remained challenging. Conclusions: Bowen’s disease and seborrheic keratosis could be correctly identified by the evaluated deep learning model on test sets from three different centers, two of which were not involved in training, and AUC scores > 0.97 were obtained. The method proved robust to changes in the staining solution and scanner model. We believe this demonstrates that deep learning algorithms can aid in clinical routine; however, the results should be confirmed by qualified histopathologists.
一些最常见的皮肤肿瘤是鲍恩病和脂溢性角化病,分别为恶性和良性增生。这些病变在皮肤病理学家的工作量中占很大比例,在某些情况下,组织学鉴别可能具有挑战性。评估了深度学习网络区分这些疾病的潜力。方法:总共从三个机构收集了1935张全切片图像,并在两种不同的切片扫描仪上进行扫描。基于U-Net的分割深度学习算法在其中一个中心的数据上进行训练,以区分鲍恩病、脂溢性角化病和正常组织,从皮肤病理学家进行的标注中学习。提取诊断分类的最佳阈值,并在包含所有三个机构数据的测试集上进行评估。结果:我们旨在以最高的敏感性诊断鲍恩病。在所有三个中心都观察到了良好的性能,突出了该模型的稳健性。在其中一个中心,鲍恩病与所有其他诊断之间的区分达到了AUC为0.9858,敏感性为0.9511。脂溢性角化病的检测AUC为0.9764,敏感性为0.9394。然而,将刺激性脂溢性角化病与鲍恩病区分开来仍然具有挑战性。结论:通过评估的深度学习模型可以在来自三个不同中心的测试集上正确识别鲍恩病和脂溢性角化病,其中两个中心未参与训练,并且获得了AUC分数>0.97。该方法被证明对染色溶液和扫描仪模型的变化具有稳健性。我们相信这表明深度学习算法可以辅助临床常规工作;然而,结果应由合格的组织病理学家进行确认。