Suppr超能文献

应用扫频源光相干断层扫描和图像二值化技术评估 2 型糖尿病非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者脉络膜

Choroidal Assessment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy by Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography and Image Binarization.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universităţii Street, 700115 Iaşi, Romania.

Department of Ophthalmology, "Saint Spiridon" Clinical Emergency Hospital, 1 Independenţei Street, 700111 Iaşi, Romania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 10;58(7):918. doi: 10.3390/medicina58070918.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate choroidal structure and vascularity indices in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Materials and Methods: Sixty-three eyes from sixty-three patients were evaluated: 21 from healthy subjects, 20 with diabetes mellitus (DM) and no diabetic retinopathy (DR), and 22 with DM and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy without diabetic macular edema (DME). Each patient underwent ocular examination, macular swept-source ocular coherence tomography (SS-OCT) imaging, glycemic control, and systemic high blood pressure (HBP) evaluation. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SF-CT) was manually assessed on a line scan. Line scan OCT images were exported to ImageJ program. The areas under a 1.5, 3 and 6 mm horizontal line centered on the fovea were assessed by converting the OCT images to binary images, and total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area (LA), stromal area (SA), LA:SA ratio, and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated. SF-CT and choroidal parameters were compared between groups, and correlations with ocular and systemic factors were analyzed. Results: SF-CT, TCA, LA, and SA were similar between groups. CVIs were significantly different between groups for all three studied areas (CVI-1.5: 66.21% vs. 66.06% vs. 63.74%, p = 0.003; CVI-3: 65.88% vs. 66.46% vs. 63.79%, p = 0.008; CVI-6: 64.79% vs. 65.40% vs. 63.61%, p = 0.032). NPDR patients had significantly lower CVIs compared to DM patients (p < 0.05). No association of choroidal parameters with glycemic control, DM duration and HBP was found significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Choroidal assessment by SS-OCT and image binarization in healthy subjects, subjects with DM without DR, and subjects with DM and NPDR indicated that CVI changes were identifiable and significant in early DR. The lack of association with ocular and systemic factors suggest that CVIs are reliable assessment parameters of choroidal vascular structure.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估非增生性糖尿病性视网膜病变(NPDR)患者的脉络膜结构和血管指数。

材料与方法

共评估了 63 只眼的 63 名患者:21 只来自健康对照者,20 只患有糖尿病(DM)但无糖尿病性视网膜病变(DR),22 只患有 DM 且有 NPDR 但无糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)。每位患者均接受眼部检查、黄斑区扫频源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)成像、血糖控制和系统性高血压(HBP)评估。手动在一条线扫描上评估中心下脉络膜厚度(SF-CT)。将线扫描 OCT 图像导出到 ImageJ 程序。通过将 OCT 图像转换为二值图像,评估以黄斑为中心的 1.5、3 和 6mm 水平线上的面积,评估总脉络膜面积(TCA)、管腔面积(LA)、基质面积(SA)、LA:SA 比和脉络膜血管指数(CVI)。比较各组之间的 SF-CT 和脉络膜参数,并分析与眼部和全身因素的相关性。

结果

各组之间的 SF-CT、TCA、LA 和 SA 相似。所有三个研究区域的 CVIs 均有显著差异(CVI-1.5:66.21%比 66.06%比 63.74%,p = 0.003;CVI-3:65.88%比 66.46%比 63.79%,p = 0.008;CVI-6:64.79%比 65.40%比 63.61%,p = 0.032)。与 DM 患者相比,NPDR 患者的 CVI 明显降低(p < 0.05)。未发现脉络膜参数与血糖控制、DM 病程和 HBP 之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.05)。

结论

SS-OCT 评估和健康受试者、无 DR 的 DM 患者以及 NPDR 的 DM 患者的图像二值化表明,在早期 DR 中,CVI 变化是可识别和显著的。与眼部和全身因素之间缺乏关联表明,CVIs 是脉络膜血管结构的可靠评估参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验