• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节的形态学参数及其与性别、关节侧别和年龄的关系——一项基于CT的研究

Morphological Parameters of the Hip Joint and Its Relation to Gender, Joint Side and Age-A CT-Based Study.

作者信息

Hawellek Thelonius, Meier Marc-Pascal, Seitz Mark-Tilman, Uhlig Johannes, Hosseini Ali Seif Amir, Beil Frank Timo, Lehmann Wolfgang, Hubert Jan

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;12(8):1774. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081774.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12081774
PMID:35892485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9332566/
Abstract

Background: Physiological reference values for morphological parameters of the hip (MPH) are of clinical importance for the treatment of painful, degenerated or fractured hip joints, as well as to detect morphological deformities, which could result in early osteoarthritis of the hip. Currently, sufficient data for MPH are lacking. Therefore, it remains unclear if age-dependent alterations in adult hip morphology are physiological and if there are side- and gender-dependent differences. The aim of the study was to analyze MPH according to gender, side and age in a large-scaled cohort by CT scans. Methods: A total of 1576 hip joints from 788 patients (female: 257, male: 531; mean age: 58.3 years (±18.9; 18−92 years)) were analyzed by CT. For all hips, acetabular anteversion (AcetAV); lateral centrum edge angle (LCE); acetabular index (AI); femoral neck version (FNV); centrum-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD); and anterior alpha angle (AαA) were measured. Results: The mean values in this cohort were: AcetAV 20.5° (±6.9); LCE 40.8° (±8.8); AI 0.3° (±5.3); FNV 11.0° (±9.8); CCD 129.9° (±7.4); and AαA 41.2° (±7.7). There was a detectable side-specific difference for AcetAV (p = 0.001); LCE (p < 0.001); CCD (p < 0.001); and AαA (p < 0.001). All the analyzed parameters showed a significant gender-specific difference, except for AI (p = 0.37). There was a significant correlation between age and AcetAV (r = 0.17; p < 0.001); LCE (r = 0.39; p < 0.001); AI (r = −0.25; p < 0.001); CCD (r = −0.15; p < 0.001); and AαA (r = 0.09; p < 0.001), except FNV (p = 0.79). Conclusions: There are side-, gender- and age-specific alterations in hip morphology, which have to be considered in treating hip joint pathologies.

摘要

背景

髋关节形态学参数的生理参考值对于治疗疼痛、退变或骨折的髋关节,以及检测可能导致早期髋关节骨关节炎的形态学畸形具有临床重要性。目前,缺乏关于髋关节形态学参数的充分数据。因此,尚不清楚成人髋关节形态随年龄的变化是否为生理性的,以及是否存在左右侧和性别差异。本研究的目的是通过CT扫描在一个大规模队列中分析按性别、左右侧和年龄分类的髋关节形态学参数。方法:对788例患者(女性:257例,男性:531例;平均年龄:58.3岁(±18.9;18 - 92岁))的1576个髋关节进行CT分析。测量所有髋关节的髋臼前倾角(AcetAV)、外侧中心边缘角(LCE)、髋臼指数(AI)、股骨颈前倾角(FNV)、中心 - 颈 - 骨干角(CCD)和前α角(AαA)。结果:该队列中的平均值为:AcetAV 20.5°(±6.9);LCE 40.8°(±8.8);AI 0.3°(±5.3);FNV 11.0°(±9.8);CCD 129.9°(±7.4);AαA 41.2°(±7.7)。AcetAV(p = 0.001)、LCE(p < 0.001)、CCD(p < 0.001)和AαA(p < 0.001)存在可检测到的左右侧特异性差异。除AI外(p = 0.37),所有分析参数均显示出显著的性别特异性差异。年龄与AcetAV(r = 0.17;p < 0.001)、LCE(r = 0.39;p < 0.001)、AI(r = -0.25;p < 0.001)、CCD(r = -0.15;p < 0.001)和AαA(r = 0.09;p < 0.001)之间存在显著相关性,但FNV除外(p = 0.79)。结论:髋关节形态存在左右侧、性别和年龄特异性改变,在治疗髋关节疾病时必须予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f98b/9332566/6f35c8489e71/diagnostics-12-01774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f98b/9332566/9ed9664f8e50/diagnostics-12-01774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f98b/9332566/6f35c8489e71/diagnostics-12-01774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f98b/9332566/9ed9664f8e50/diagnostics-12-01774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f98b/9332566/6f35c8489e71/diagnostics-12-01774-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Morphological Parameters of the Hip Joint and Its Relation to Gender, Joint Side and Age-A CT-Based Study.髋关节的形态学参数及其与性别、关节侧别和年龄的关系——一项基于CT的研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;12(8):1774. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081774.
2
Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.发育性髋关节异常中的股骨形态学:CT三维特征分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5119-2.
3
Correlation between femoral version and severity of hip dysplasia in patients with advanced osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术前晚期骨关节炎患者股骨扭转角度与髋关节发育不良严重程度的相关性
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2022 Mar-Apr;66(2):121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
4
Acetabular Retroversion and Decreased Posterior Coverage Are Associated With Sports-related Posterior Hip Dislocation in Adolescents.髋臼后倾和后覆盖减少与青少年运动相关性髋关节后脱位有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1101-1108. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000514.
5
Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography.使用三维计算机断层扫描技术研究正常髋关节中股骨近端和髋臼的对准关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):367-75. doi: 10.1177/0363546511424390. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
6
Acetabular Global Insufficiency in Patients with Down Syndrome and Hip-Related Symptoms: A Matched-Cohort Study.唐氏综合征患者髋臼整体功能不全与髋关节相关症状:一项配对队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 18;99(20):1760-1768. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00341.
7
Do Radiographic Parameters of Dysplasia Improve to Normal Ranges After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后发育不良的影像学参数会改善至正常范围吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1120-1127. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5077-8.
8
Intraoperative Evaluation of Acetabular Morphology in Hip Arthroscopy Comparing Standard Radiography Versus Fluoroscopy: A Cadaver Study.髋关节镜检查中髋臼形态的术中评估:标准X线摄影与透视的比较——一项尸体研究
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1030-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.048. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
9
Mild or Borderline Hip Dysplasia: Are We Characterizing Hips With a Lateral Center-Edge Angle Between 18° and 25° Appropriately?轻度或边缘性髋关节发育不良:我们是否正确地描述了外侧中心边缘角在 18°至 25°之间的髋关节?
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):112-122. doi: 10.1177/0363546518810731.
10
[Imaging observation of the femoral neck anteversion in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip].[发育性髋关节发育不良患者股骨颈前倾角的影像学观察]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 May;53(5):353-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Multivariate Quantitative Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy Using Discrete Element Analysis.使用离散元分析的髋臼周围截骨术的多变量定量结果
Adv Orthop. 2025 Aug 22;2025:1479343. doi: 10.1155/aort/1479343. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of Local Software for Automatic Measurement of Geometric Parameters in the Proximal Femur Using a Combination of a Deep Learning Approach and an Active Shape Model on X-ray Images.基于深度学习方法和主动形状模型的 X 射线图像在股骨近端几何参数自动测量中的局部软件的开发。
J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Apr;37(2):633-652. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00953-3. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
3
[Tips and tricks of cement removal in the case of revision surgery].

本文引用的文献

1
The neck-shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors.颈干角:参考值及相关因素的最新研究进展。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):53-57. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
2
MRI hip findings in asymptomatic professional rugby players, ballet dancers, and age-matched controls.无症状职业橄榄球运动员、芭蕾舞演员和年龄匹配对照组的 MRI 髋关节研究结果。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
3
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Femoral Torsion Angle Based on Tilting Angles of Femoral Neck and Condylar Axis.
[翻修手术中骨水泥清除的技巧与窍门]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Mar;53(3):176-184. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04453-8. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
基于股骨颈倾斜角和髁轴倾斜角的股骨扭转角的超声评估。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1970-1976. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 May 4.
4
Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.各种测量方法在股骨扭转中的差异在股骨扭转过度的髋关节中增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1073-1083. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000610.
5
Which factors influence proximal femoral asymmetry?: a 3D CT analysis of 345 femoral pairs.哪些因素影响股骨近端的不对称性?:345 对股骨的三维 CT 分析。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):839-844. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1601.R1.
6
The natural alpha angle of the femoral head-neck junction: a cross-sectional CT study in 1312 femurs.股骨头颈交界区的自然 alpha 角:1312 例股骨的横断面 CT 研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 May 1;100-B(5):570-578. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B5.BJJ-2017-0249.R3.
7
Prevalence of Cam and Pincer Deformities in the X-Rays of Asymptomatic Individuals.无症状个体 X 光片中的 Cam 和 Pincer 畸形的患病率。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8562329. doi: 10.1155/2017/8562329. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Femoral version: Comparison among advanced imaging methods.股骨扭转角:先进成像方法之间的比较。
J Orthop Res. 2018 May;36(5):1536-1542. doi: 10.1002/jor.23785. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Prevalence of Femoral and Acetabular Version Abnormalities in Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: A Controlled Study of 538 Hips.髋关节疾病症状患者的股骨和髋臼版本异常的流行率:一项对 538 髋的对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):122-134. doi: 10.1177/0363546517726983. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
Is Contralateral Templating Reliable for Establishing Rotational Alignment During Intramedullary Stabilization of Femoral Shaft Fractures? A Study of Individual Bilateral Differences in Femoral Version.在股骨干骨折髓内固定过程中,对侧模板法用于确定旋转对线是否可靠?一项关于股骨扭转角个体双侧差异的研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Feb;32(2):61-66. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001028.