Suppr超能文献

导致住院及住院期间发生的药物不良事件的优先级排序:一项兰德公司的调查

Prioritisation of Adverse Drug Events Leading to Hospital Admission and Occurring during Hospitalisation: A RAND Survey.

作者信息

Haerdtlein Annette, Boehmer Anna Maria, Karsten Dafonte Katharina, Rottenkolber Marietta, Jaehde Ulrich, Dreischulte Tobias

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 22;11(15):4254. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154254.

Abstract

(1) Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a common cause of emergency department visits and occur frequently during hospitalisation. Instruments that facilitate the detection of the most relevant ADEs could lead to a more targeted and efficient use of limited resources in research and practice. (2) We conducted two consensus processes based on the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, in order to prioritise ADEs leading to hospital admission (panel 1) and occurring during hospital stay (panel 2) for inclusion in future ADE measurement instruments. In each panel, the experts were asked to assess the "overall importance" of each ADE on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not important to 4 = very important). ADEs with a median rating of ≥3 without disagreement were defined as "prioritised". (3) The 13 experts in panel 1 prioritised 38 out of 65 ADEs, while the 12 experts in panel 2 prioritised 34 out of 63 ADEs. The highest rated events were acute kidney injury and hypoglycaemia (both panels), as well as Stevens-Johnson syndrome in panel 1 and rhabdomyolysis in panel 2. (4) The survey led to a set of ADEs for which there was consensus that they were of particular importance as presentations of acute medication-related harm, thereby providing a focus for further medication safety research and clinical practice.

摘要

(1) 药物不良事件(ADEs)是急诊科就诊的常见原因,且在住院期间频繁发生。有助于检测最相关ADEs的工具可使研究和实践中有限资源的使用更具针对性和效率。(2) 我们基于兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法进行了两轮共识流程,以便对导致住院的ADEs(小组1)以及住院期间发生的ADEs(小组2)进行优先级排序,以纳入未来的ADE测量工具。在每个小组中,要求专家们根据四点李克特量表(1 = 不重要至4 = 非常重要)评估每个ADE的“总体重要性”。中位数评分≥3且无异议的ADEs被定义为“优先级”。(3) 小组1中的13位专家对65个ADEs中的38个进行了优先级排序,而小组2中的12位专家对63个ADEs中的34个进行了优先级排序。评分最高的事件是急性肾损伤和低血糖(两个小组均如此),以及小组1中的史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和小组2中的横纹肌溶解症。(4) 该调查得出了一组ADEs,对于这些ADEs,大家一致认为它们作为急性药物相关伤害的表现尤为重要,从而为进一步的药物安全研究和临床实践提供了重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38de/9332872/8667c7ef3431/jcm-11-04254-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验