Suppr超能文献

在基层医疗中同时开始使用两种或更多药物:这样做的频率如何,需求频率又如何?

Starting Two or More Drugs Concurrently in Primary Care: How Often Is It Done, How Often Is It Needed?

作者信息

Eguale Tewodros, Mirica Maria, Salazar Alejandra, Shilka John, Galanter William, Cashy John, Gellad Walid, Hale Jennifer, Lambert Bruce L, Mohamed Aneesha Fathima Syed, Kandikatla Renuka, Volk Lynn A, Wright Adam, Linder Jeffrey A, Schiff Gordon D

机构信息

Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.

Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09455-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing awareness of the need for more cautious, conservative prescribing. One conservative prescribing principle urges prescribers, whenever possible, to start only one new medication at a time. Little is known about how often primary care physicians (PCPs) start multiple medications at the same time, and when that is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how frequently PCPs start multiple prescriptions at the same time, evaluate evidence supporting the necessity of initiating multiple prescriptions concurrently, and describe PCP and clinical sites' prescribing variability.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

PCPs at four sites who wrote prescriptions during January 2017-December 2018.

MAIN MEASURES

Frequency of initiating two or more new prescriptions during the same session.

KEY RESULTS

Across the four sites, 4646 PCPs wrote 7,849,914 new prescriptions. The Veterans Administration (VA) site had the highest percentage of encounters with multiple concurrent new drug starts (27.2%), followed by Northwestern (NW) (19.7%), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) (16.1%), and University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) (14.0%). Within each site, there was wide variation among PCPs in percentage of encounters where they prescribed multiple new medications. Interquartile range varied: 11.0-18.5% (BWH), 15.1-22% (NW), 11.0-15.8% (UIC), and 22.9-31.0% (VA). Reviewing the most frequent combinations, only 0.6% had strong evidence for starting them concurrently. Most were drugs either recommended to be taken together (16.8%) or reasonable to be taken together, but with no evidence supporting starting them simultaneously (71.5%). A smaller percentage of concurrent starts were potentially problematic (10.4%) or contraindicated (0.7%) due to overlapping side effects or drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs frequently started multiple medications concurrently, often without compelling evidence, with notable variations across prescribers and institutions. Although we could not conduct detailed chart review for each encounter, classification of the most frequent drug pairs concurrently prescribed in our study suggests opportunities to potentially improve prescribing safety.

摘要

背景

人们越来越意识到需要更加谨慎、保守地开药。一条保守的开药原则敦促开药者尽可能每次只开始一种新药。对于基层医疗医生(PCP)同时开始使用多种药物的频率以及何时需要这样做,人们了解甚少。

目的

描述基层医疗医生同时开始多种处方的频率,评估支持同时开具多种处方必要性的证据,并描述基层医疗医生和临床机构的开药差异。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

参与者

2017年1月至2018年12月期间在四个地点开具处方的基层医疗医生。

主要测量指标

在同一会诊期间开始两种或更多新处方的频率。

关键结果

在这四个地点,4646名基层医疗医生共开具了7849914张新处方。退伍军人管理局(VA)地点同时开始多种新药的会诊比例最高(27.2%),其次是西北大学(NW)(19.7%)、布莱根妇女医院(BWH)(16.1%)和伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校(UIC)(14.0%)。在每个地点内,基层医疗医生开具多种新药的会诊比例差异很大。四分位距各不相同:11.0 - 18.5%(BWH)、15.1 - 22%(NW)、11.0 - 15.8%(UIC)和22.9 - 31.0%(VA)。审查最常见的组合时,只有0.6%有同时开始使用它们的有力证据。大多数是建议一起服用(16.8%)或合理一起服用,但没有证据支持同时开始使用的药物(71.5%)。由于副作用重叠或药物相互作用,同时开始使用的药物中较小比例存在潜在问题(10.4%)或禁忌(0.7%)。

结论

基层医疗医生经常同时开始多种药物治疗,通常没有令人信服的证据,不同开药者和机构之间存在显著差异。尽管我们无法对每次会诊进行详细的病历审查,但我们研究中同时开具的最常见药物对的分类表明有机会潜在地提高开药安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验