Eguale Tewodros, Mirica Maria, Salazar Alejandra, Shilka John, Galanter William, Cashy John, Gellad Walid, Hale Jennifer, Lambert Bruce L, Mohamed Aneesha Fathima Syed, Kandikatla Renuka, Volk Lynn A, Wright Adam, Linder Jeffrey A, Schiff Gordon D
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09455-0.
There is growing awareness of the need for more cautious, conservative prescribing. One conservative prescribing principle urges prescribers, whenever possible, to start only one new medication at a time. Little is known about how often primary care physicians (PCPs) start multiple medications at the same time, and when that is needed.
To describe how frequently PCPs start multiple prescriptions at the same time, evaluate evidence supporting the necessity of initiating multiple prescriptions concurrently, and describe PCP and clinical sites' prescribing variability.
Retrospective cohort study.
PCPs at four sites who wrote prescriptions during January 2017-December 2018.
Frequency of initiating two or more new prescriptions during the same session.
Across the four sites, 4646 PCPs wrote 7,849,914 new prescriptions. The Veterans Administration (VA) site had the highest percentage of encounters with multiple concurrent new drug starts (27.2%), followed by Northwestern (NW) (19.7%), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) (16.1%), and University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) (14.0%). Within each site, there was wide variation among PCPs in percentage of encounters where they prescribed multiple new medications. Interquartile range varied: 11.0-18.5% (BWH), 15.1-22% (NW), 11.0-15.8% (UIC), and 22.9-31.0% (VA). Reviewing the most frequent combinations, only 0.6% had strong evidence for starting them concurrently. Most were drugs either recommended to be taken together (16.8%) or reasonable to be taken together, but with no evidence supporting starting them simultaneously (71.5%). A smaller percentage of concurrent starts were potentially problematic (10.4%) or contraindicated (0.7%) due to overlapping side effects or drug-drug interactions.
PCPs frequently started multiple medications concurrently, often without compelling evidence, with notable variations across prescribers and institutions. Although we could not conduct detailed chart review for each encounter, classification of the most frequent drug pairs concurrently prescribed in our study suggests opportunities to potentially improve prescribing safety.
人们越来越意识到需要更加谨慎、保守地开药。一条保守的开药原则敦促开药者尽可能每次只开始一种新药。对于基层医疗医生(PCP)同时开始使用多种药物的频率以及何时需要这样做,人们了解甚少。
描述基层医疗医生同时开始多种处方的频率,评估支持同时开具多种处方必要性的证据,并描述基层医疗医生和临床机构的开药差异。
回顾性队列研究。
2017年1月至2018年12月期间在四个地点开具处方的基层医疗医生。
在同一会诊期间开始两种或更多新处方的频率。
在这四个地点,4646名基层医疗医生共开具了7849914张新处方。退伍军人管理局(VA)地点同时开始多种新药的会诊比例最高(27.2%),其次是西北大学(NW)(19.7%)、布莱根妇女医院(BWH)(16.1%)和伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校(UIC)(14.0%)。在每个地点内,基层医疗医生开具多种新药的会诊比例差异很大。四分位距各不相同:11.0 - 18.5%(BWH)、15.1 - 22%(NW)、11.0 - 15.8%(UIC)和22.9 - 31.0%(VA)。审查最常见的组合时,只有0.6%有同时开始使用它们的有力证据。大多数是建议一起服用(16.8%)或合理一起服用,但没有证据支持同时开始使用的药物(71.5%)。由于副作用重叠或药物相互作用,同时开始使用的药物中较小比例存在潜在问题(10.4%)或禁忌(0.7%)。
基层医疗医生经常同时开始多种药物治疗,通常没有令人信服的证据,不同开药者和机构之间存在显著差异。尽管我们无法对每次会诊进行详细的病历审查,但我们研究中同时开具的最常见药物对的分类表明有机会潜在地提高开药安全性。