Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 封锁:一项调查运动员运动分类和性别对训练实践影响的全球研究。

COVID-19 Lockdown: A Global Study Investigating the Effect of Athletes' Sport Classification and Sex on Training Practices.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Jul 8;17(8):1242-1256. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0543. Print 2022 Aug 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate differences in athletes' knowledge, beliefs, and training practices during COVID-19 lockdowns with reference to sport classification and sex. This work extends an initial descriptive evaluation focusing on athlete classification.

METHODS

Athletes (12,526; 66% male; 142 countries) completed an online survey (May-July 2020) assessing knowledge, beliefs, and practices toward training. Sports were classified as team sports (45%), endurance (20%), power/technical (10%), combat (9%), aquatic (6%), recreational (4%), racquet (3%), precision (2%), parasports (1%), and others (1%). Further analysis by sex was performed.

RESULTS

During lockdown, athletes practiced body-weight-based exercises routinely (67% females and 64% males), ranging from 50% (precision) to 78% (parasports). More sport-specific technical skills were performed in combat, parasports, and precision (∼50%) than other sports (∼35%). Most athletes (range: 50% [parasports] to 75% [endurance]) performed cardiorespiratory training (trivial sex differences). Compared to prelockdown, perceived training intensity was reduced by 29% to 41%, depending on sport (largest decline: ∼38% in team sports, unaffected by sex). Some athletes (range: 7%-49%) maintained their training intensity for strength, endurance, speed, plyometric, change-of-direction, and technical training. Athletes who previously trained ≥5 sessions per week reduced their volume (range: 18%-28%) during lockdown. The proportion of athletes (81%) training ≥60 min/session reduced by 31% to 43% during lockdown. Males and females had comparable moderate levels of training knowledge (56% vs 58%) and beliefs/attitudes (54% vs 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in athletes' training practices were sport-specific, with few or no sex differences. Team-based sports were generally more susceptible to changes than individual sports. Policy makers should provide athletes with specific training arrangements and educational resources to facilitate remote and/or home-based training during lockdown-type events.

摘要

目的

调查与运动分类和性别有关的 COVID-19 封锁期间运动员知识、信念和训练实践的差异。这项工作扩展了最初侧重于运动员分类的描述性评估。

方法

运动员(12526 名;66%为男性;来自 142 个国家)完成了一项在线调查(2020 年 5 月至 7 月),评估了他们对训练的知识、信念和实践。运动分为团体运动(45%)、耐力(20%)、力量/技术(10%)、格斗(9%)、水上运动(6%)、娱乐(4%)、球拍(3%)、精准(2%)、残奥运动(1%)和其他运动(1%)。进一步按性别进行了分析。

结果

在封锁期间,运动员经常进行基于体重的练习(女性 67%,男性 64%),范围从 50%(精准)到 78%(残奥运动)。在格斗、残奥运动和精准运动中,更多的专项技术技能得到了练习(约 50%),而其他运动中则约为 35%。大多数运动员(范围:50%[残奥运动]至 75%[耐力])进行心肺训练(性别差异很小)。与封锁前相比,运动强度降低了 29%至 41%,具体取决于运动类型(团队运动降幅最大,约为 38%,不受性别影响)。一些运动员(范围:7%-49%)保持了他们的力量、耐力、速度、爆发力、变向和技术训练的训练强度。以前每周训练 5 次以上的运动员在封锁期间减少了训练量(范围:18%-28%)。每周训练 60 分钟/节以上的运动员比例(81%)在封锁期间减少了 31%至 43%。男性和女性的训练知识(56%对 58%)和信念/态度(54%对 56%)处于中等水平。

结论

运动员训练实践的变化因运动类型而异,几乎没有或没有性别差异。团体运动比个人运动更容易受到影响。政策制定者应向运动员提供特定的训练安排和教育资源,以方便在封锁等事件期间进行远程和/或家庭训练。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验