Suppr超能文献

奥地利下奥地利州对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白特异性抗体反应的纵向监测。

Longitudinal monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific antibody responses in Lower Austria.

机构信息

Research Division for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Center for Biosciences, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria.

Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), UMR S1266, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271382. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The Lower Austrian Wachau region was an early COVID-19 hotspot of infection. As previously reported, in June 2020, after the first peak of infections, we determined that 8.5% and 9.0% of the participants in Weißenkirchen and surrounding communities in the Wachau region were positive for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, respectively. Here, we present novel data obtained eight months later (February 2021) from Weißenkirchen, after the second peak of infection, with 25.0% (138/552) and 23.6% (130/552) of participants that are positive for IgG and IgA, respectively. In participants with previous IgG/IgA positivity (June 2020), we observed a 24% reduction in IgG levels, whereas the IgA levels remained stable in February 2021. This subgroup was further analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 induced T cell activities. Although 76% (34/45) and 76% (34/45) of IgG positive and IgA positive participants, respectively, showed specific T cell activities (upon exposure to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-derived peptides), those were not significantly correlated with the levels of IgG or IgA. Thus, the analyses of antibodies cannot surrogate the measurement of T cell activities. For a comprehensive view on SARS-CoV-2-triggered immune responses, the measurement of different classes of antibodies should be complemented with the determination of T cell activities.

摘要

下奥地利州瓦豪地区是 COVID-19 感染的早期热点地区。如前所述,在 2020 年 6 月,在感染的第一个高峰之后,我们发现瓦豪地区魏森基兴及其周边社区的参与者中,分别有 8.5%和 9.0%的人对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白受体结合域的免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)和免疫球蛋白 A(IgA)抗体呈阳性。在这里,我们呈现了八个月后(2021 年 2 月)从魏森基兴获得的新数据,在第二次感染高峰后,有 25.0%(138/552)和 23.6%(130/552)的参与者 IgG 和 IgA 呈阳性。在之前 IgG/IgA 阳性的参与者中(2020 年 6 月),我们观察到 IgG 水平下降了 24%,而 IgA 水平在 2021 年 2 月保持稳定。对该亚组进行了 SARS-CoV-2 诱导的 T 细胞活性分析。虽然分别有 76%(34/45)和 76%(34/45)的 IgG 阳性和 IgA 阳性参与者显示出特异性 T 细胞活性(在接触 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白衍生肽后),但这些活性与 IgG 或 IgA 的水平没有显著相关性。因此,抗体分析不能替代 T 细胞活性的测量。为了全面了解 SARS-CoV-2 触发的免疫反应,应将不同类别的抗体测量与 T 细胞活性的测定相结合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5147/9328535/c001429fd8b8/pone.0271382.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验