Institute of Occupational-, Social- and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271996. eCollection 2022.
This review aims to provide an overview of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies analyzing stress reactivity during daily life in terms of direct and moderated influence of acute stress on physiological responses.
A systematic literature search was performed on November 29, 2021 using Web of Science, MEDLINE and PsycINFO to identify prospective EMA studies targeting acute stressors or stress under naturalistic conditions, without restrictions of publication date or population. Study quality was assessed for multiple EMA-specific sources of bias.
Out of 4285 non-duplicate records, 107 publications involving 104 unique studies were included. The majority of studies assessed acute physiological stress responses primarily through salivary cortisol (n = 59) and cardiovascular outcomes (n = 32). Most studies performed at least three measurements per day (n = 59), and had a moderate risk of recall bias (n = 68) and confounding (n = 85). Fifty-four studies reported a compliance of ≥80%. Direct, non-moderated positive associations were observed between acute stress exposure and concurrent cortisol levels (44%, n = 11/25), systolic (44%, 8/18) and diastolic blood pressure (53%, 8/15) and heart rate (53%, 9/17). Several inter- and intra-individual moderators were identified, such as age, gender, health status, chronic stress, work-related resources, physical activity and stress coping indicators.
About half of the reviewed EMA studies demonstrated direct associations between everyday acute stress exposure and physiological responses, including increased cortisol levels, blood pressure and heart rate. Results further suggested various moderator variables that could help develop tailored prevention strategies and identify groups at higher risk for dysfunctional stress responses.
PROSPERO-Reg.-No.: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020163178.
本综述旨在概述生态瞬时评估 (EMA) 研究,从急性应激对生理反应的直接和调节影响方面分析日常生活中的应激反应。
2021 年 11 月 29 日,通过 Web of Science、MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO 进行了系统文献检索,以确定针对急性应激源或自然条件下应激的前瞻性 EMA 研究,不限制出版日期或人群。评估了多项 EMA 特定来源的偏倚的研究质量。
在 4285 份非重复记录中,纳入了 107 篇涉及 104 项独特研究的出版物。大多数研究主要通过唾液皮质醇(n = 59)和心血管结果(n = 32)评估急性生理应激反应。大多数研究每天进行至少三次测量(n = 59),且存在中度回忆偏倚风险(n = 68)和混杂因素风险(n = 85)。54 项研究报告的依从性≥80%。观察到急性应激暴露与同期皮质醇水平(44%,n = 11/25)、收缩压(44%,n = 18)、舒张压(53%,n = 15)和心率(53%,n = 17)之间存在直接、非调节的正相关。还确定了几个个体间和个体内的调节因素,例如年龄、性别、健康状况、慢性应激、与工作相关的资源、身体活动和应激应对指标。
大约一半的审查 EMA 研究表明,日常急性应激暴露与生理反应之间存在直接关联,包括皮质醇水平升高、血压和心率增加。结果还表明,各种调节变量可以帮助制定针对性的预防策略,并确定应激反应功能障碍风险较高的人群。
PROSPERO 注册号:PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020163178。