Balint Elisabeth Maria, Angerer Peter, Guendel Harald, Marten-Mittag Birgitt, Jarczok Marc N
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Burnout Section, Privatklinik Meiringen, 3860 Meiringen, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073841.
Stress management interventions aim to reduce the disease risk that is heightened by work stress. Possible pathways of risk reduction include improvements in the autonomous nervous system, which is indexed by the measurement of heart rate variability (HRV). A randomized controlled trial on improving stress management skills at work was conducted to investigate the effects of intervention on HRV. A total of 174 lower management employees were randomized into either the waiting list control group (CG) or the intervention group (IG) receiving a 2-day stress management training program and another half-day booster after four and six months. In the trial, 24 h HRV was measured at baseline and after 12 months. Heart rate (HR), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), and standard deviation of the average of normal-to-normal intervals (SDANN) were calculated for 24 h and nighttime periods. Age-adjusted multilevel mixed effects linear regressions with unstructured covariance, time as a random coefficient, and time × group interaction with the according likelihood-ratio tests were calculated. The linear mixed-effect regression models showed neither group effects between IG and CG at baseline nor time effects between baseline and follow-up for SDANN (24 h), SDNN (24 h and nighttime), RMSSD (24 h and nighttime), and HR (24 h and nighttime). Nighttime SDANN significantly improved in the intervention group (z = 2.04, = 0.041) compared to the control group. The objective stress axis measures (SDANN) showed successful stress reduction due to the training. Nighttime SDANN was strongly associated with minimum HR. Though the effects were small and only visible at night, it is highly remarkable that 3 days of intervention achieved a measurable effect considering that stress is only one of many factors that can influence HR and HRV.
压力管理干预旨在降低因工作压力而升高的疾病风险。降低风险的可能途径包括改善自主神经系统,这可以通过心率变异性(HRV)测量来衡量。一项关于提高工作中压力管理技能的随机对照试验,旨在研究干预对HRV的影响。总共174名基层管理人员被随机分为候补名单对照组(CG)或干预组(IG),干预组接受为期2天的压力管理培训计划,并在4个月和6个月后接受半天的强化培训。在试验中,在基线和12个月后测量24小时HRV。计算24小时和夜间时段的心率(HR)、逐次差值的均方根(RMSSD)、正常到正常间期的标准差(SDNN)以及正常到正常间期平均值的标准差(SDANN)。计算具有非结构化协方差、时间作为随机系数以及时间×组交互作用的年龄调整多水平混合效应线性回归,并进行相应的似然比检验。线性混合效应回归模型显示,在基线时IG和CG之间没有组效应,在基线和随访之间,SDANN(24小时)、SDNN(24小时和夜间)、RMSSD(24小时和夜间)以及HR(24小时和夜间)也没有时间效应。与对照组相比,干预组夜间SDANN显著改善(z = 2.04,P = 0.041)。客观压力轴测量指标(SDANN)显示,训练成功降低了压力。夜间SDANN与最低心率密切相关。尽管效果较小且仅在夜间可见,但考虑到压力只是众多可影响HR和HRV的因素之一,3天的干预能取得可测量的效果,这一点非常显著。