• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 HUNT 研究数据的机器学习开发偶发性高血压风险模型。

Development of risk models of incident hypertension using machine learning on the HUNT study data.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56170-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-56170-7
PMID:38454041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10920790/
Abstract

In this study, we aimed to create an 11-year hypertension risk prediction model using data from the Trøndelag Health (HUNT) Study in Norway, involving 17 852 individuals (20-85 years; 38% male; 24% incidence rate) with blood pressure (BP) below the hypertension threshold at baseline (1995-1997). We assessed 18 clinical, behavioral, and socioeconomic features, employing machine learning models such as eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Elastic regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forest. For comparison, we used logistic regression and a decision rule as reference models and validated six external models, with focus on the Framingham risk model. The top-performing models consistently included XGBoost, Elastic regression and SVM. These models efficiently identified hypertension risk, even among individuals with optimal baseline BP (< 120/80 mmHg), although improvement over reference models was modest. The recalibrated Framingham risk model outperformed the reference models, approaching the best-performing ML models. Important features included age, systolic and diastolic BP, body mass index, height, and family history of hypertension. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that linear effects sufficed for a well-performing model. The best models efficiently predicted hypertension risk, even among those with optimal or normal baseline BP, using few features. The recalibrated Framingham risk model proved effective in our cohort.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们旨在使用来自挪威特隆赫姆健康(HUNT)研究的数据创建一个 11 年高血压风险预测模型,涉及 17852 名个体(20-85 岁;38%为男性;24%的发病率),他们在基线(1995-1997 年)时血压低于高血压阈值。我们评估了 18 个临床、行为和社会经济特征,使用机器学习模型,如极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、弹性回归、K-最近邻、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林。为了比较,我们使用逻辑回归和决策规则作为参考模型,并验证了六个外部模型,重点是弗雷明汉风险模型。表现最好的模型始终包括 XGBoost、弹性回归和 SVM。这些模型即使在基线血压最佳的个体中(<120/80mmHg),也能有效地识别高血压风险,尽管与参考模型相比略有改善。经重新校准的弗雷明汉风险模型优于参考模型,接近表现最佳的 ML 模型。重要的特征包括年龄、收缩压和舒张压、体重指数、身高和高血压家族史。总之,我们的研究表明,线性效应足以满足表现良好的模型。最好的模型使用少数特征就能有效地预测高血压风险,即使是在基线血压最佳或正常的个体中。经重新校准的弗雷明汉风险模型在我们的队列中证明是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/6a664dbd004e/41598_2024_56170_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/7a49f20a6d0e/41598_2024_56170_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/318dd97fb418/41598_2024_56170_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/fea1b3792762/41598_2024_56170_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/557a4ec17079/41598_2024_56170_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/174704a29363/41598_2024_56170_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/6a664dbd004e/41598_2024_56170_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/7a49f20a6d0e/41598_2024_56170_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/318dd97fb418/41598_2024_56170_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/fea1b3792762/41598_2024_56170_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/557a4ec17079/41598_2024_56170_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/174704a29363/41598_2024_56170_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5427/10920790/6a664dbd004e/41598_2024_56170_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of risk models of incident hypertension using machine learning on the HUNT study data.利用 HUNT 研究数据的机器学习开发偶发性高血压风险模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56170-7.
2
Machine learning-based models to predict the conversion of normal blood pressure to hypertension within 5-year follow-up.基于机器学习的模型预测正常血压在 5 年内转为高血压。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0300201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300201. eCollection 2024.
3
Prediction and feature selection of low birth weight using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测和选择低出生体重。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Oct 12;43(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00647-8.
4
Machine learning algorithms identify hypokalaemia risk in people with hypertension in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018.机器学习算法在美国国家健康与营养调查 1999-2018 中识别出高血压人群中的低钾血症风险。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2209336. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2209336.
5
Interpretable machine learning for allergic rhinitis prediction among preschool children in Urumqi, China.中国乌鲁木齐学龄前儿童变应性鼻炎预测的可解释机器学习。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73733-w.
6
Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.用于预测埃塞俄比亚 COVID-19 死亡率的机器学习算法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1728. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19196-0.
7
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
8
Machine learning model-based risk prediction of severe complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.基于机器学习模型的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后严重并发症风险预测
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2023 Feb;32(2):185-194. doi: 10.17219/acem/152895.
9
Prediction of metabolic and pre-metabolic syndromes using machine learning models with anthropometric, lifestyle, and biochemical factors from a middle-aged population in Korea.使用来自韩国中年人群的人体测量学、生活方式和生化因素的机器学习模型预测代谢和前代谢综合征。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13131-x.
10
Machine learning models predict triage levels, massive transfusion protocol activation, and mortality in trauma utilizing patients hemodynamics on admission.机器学习模型利用创伤患者入院时的血流动力学来预测分诊级别、大量输血方案的激活和死亡率。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Sep;179:108880. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108880. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Models to Assess the Value of Stroke Genetic Liability for Prediction of Risk of Stroke Within the UK Biobank.评估机器学习和传统统计模型以评估中风遗传易感性在英国生物银行中对中风风险预测的价值。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 26;13(9):1003. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091003.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic risk models for incident hypertension: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis.预测高血压事件的预后风险模型:PRISMA 系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0294148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294148. eCollection 2024.
2
Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey.深度神经网络与表格数据:一项综述。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2024 Jun;35(6):7499-7519. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3229161. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
A comparison of machine learning algorithms and traditional regression-based statistical modeling for predicting hypertension incidence in a Canadian population.
比较机器学习算法和基于传统回归的统计建模在预测加拿大人群高血压发病率中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27264-x.
4
Predicting hypertension onset from longitudinal electronic health records with deep learning.利用深度学习从纵向电子健康记录预测高血压发病情况。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Nov 25;5(4):ooac097. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac097. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Prediction Model for Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Using Korean Public Health Examination Data (2002-2017).利用韩国公共卫生检查数据(2002 - 2017年)建立的高血压和糖尿病预测模型
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 14;12(8):1967. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081967.
6
Development and validation of a hypertension risk prediction model and construction of a risk score in a Canadian population.开发和验证加拿大人群高血压风险预测模型及构建风险评分
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16904-x.
7
Cohort Profile Update: The HUNT Study, Norway.队列简介更新:挪威HUNT研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):e80-e91. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac095.
8
Prediction of hypertension using traditional regression and machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用传统回归和机器学习模型预测高血压:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266334. eCollection 2022.
9
Development and validation of hypertension prediction models: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study_Cardiovascular Disease Association Study (KoGES_CAVAS).高血压预测模型的开发与验证:韩国基因组与流行病学研究_心血管疾病关联研究(KoGES_CAVAS)
J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Mar;37(3):205-212. doi: 10.1038/s41371-021-00645-x. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
10
Association between Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) and body weight in a population free from cardiovascular disease - The HUNT study.无心血管疾病人群中个人活动智能(PAI)与体重的关联——HUNT研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Mar 21;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100091. eCollection 2021 Jun.