Zadrapova Mariana, Mrázková Eva, Janura Miroslav, Strycek Michal, Cerny Martin
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 70300 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Clinic of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, University Hospital of Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159069.
Ensuring the regularity and correctness of rehabilitation exercises in the home environment is a prerequisite for successful treatment. This clinical study compares balance therapy in the home environment on a conventional balance mat and an instrumented wobble board, with biofeedback supported by a rehabilitation scheme realized as web-based software that controls the course of rehabilitation remotely. The study included 55 patients with knee injuries. The control group consisted of 25 patients (12 females and 13 males, mean age 39 ± 12 years) and the study group of 30 patients (19 females and 11 males, mean age 40 ± 12 years). Treatment effects were compared using the ICS Balance Platform measurement system. Measurements showed significant differences in the change in ICS Balance platform parameters representing the dynamic stability of the patients. The dynamic stability improved more with the instrumented wobble board. The study did not show an influence of different methods of communication with patients during home-based rehabilitation.
确保在家中环境下康复锻炼的规律性和正确性是治疗成功的先决条件。这项临床研究比较了在传统平衡垫和仪器化摆动板上进行的家庭环境平衡疗法，以及由作为基于网络的软件实现的康复方案支持的生物反馈，该软件可远程控制康复进程。该研究纳入了55名膝关节损伤患者。对照组由25名患者组成（12名女性和13名男性，平均年龄39±12岁），研究组由30名患者组成（19名女性和11名男性，平均年龄40±12岁）。使用ICS平衡平台测量系统比较治疗效果。测量结果显示，代表患者动态稳定性的ICS平衡平台参数变化存在显著差异。使用仪器化摆动板时，动态稳定性改善得更多。该研究未显示在家中康复期间与患者的不同沟通方式有影响。
Zotero 插件