Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28001 Madrid, Spain.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Life and Natural Sciences, University of Nebrija, 28240 Madrid, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159121.
The aim of the present research was to analyse the objective and subjective stress responses of students in a clinical case evaluation and the correlation with academic performance, as well as to analyse the differences in grade and difficulty perceptions between students and professors that designed the clinical case. A sample of 103 first-year students from a nursing degree was studied. In this sample, the objective stress was analysed by measuring the autonomic modulation (through the heart rate variability); moreover, the subjective stress was analysed using the SUDS scale. Furthermore, the difficulty perception and academic performance were measured using scales for both students and professors. The measures were taken before and after the clinical exams. A large subjective and objective stress response was observed at the beginning of the clinical case, and this response was related to a high academic performance perception. Upon completion of the clinical evaluation, both the stress response and the academic performance perception decreased. The professors and students presented different grade and difficulty perceptions concerning the clinical case.
本研究旨在分析临床病例评估中学生的客观和主观压力反应及其与学业成绩的相关性，并分析设计临床病例的学生和教授之间的年级和难度感知差异。对护理学位的 103 名一年级学生进行了样本研究。在该样本中，通过测量自主调制（通过心率变异性）来分析客观压力；此外，使用 SUDS 量表分析主观压力。此外，使用学生和教授的量表来测量难度感知和学业成绩。这些措施是在临床考试前后进行的。在临床病例开始时观察到了较大的主观和客观压力反应，这种反应与高学业成绩感知有关。临床评估完成后，压力反应和学业成绩感知都降低了。教授和学生对临床病例的年级和难度感知不同。
