Martinescu Elena, Jansen Wiebren, Beersma Bianca
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Group Organ Manag. 2021 Jun;46(3):463-497. doi: 10.1177/1059601120986876. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Ample experimental evidence shows that negative gossip fosters cooperation in groups by increasing individuals' reputational concerns. However, recent field studies showed that negative gossip decreases organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) among its targets (i.e., people whom gossip is about). Bridging these findings, we study the role of social inclusion in explaining how negative gossip affects targets' engagement in OCB. Based on social exchange theory, we predict that targets of negative gossip experience low social inclusion. In turn, we propose that low social inclusion leads to low OCB of gossip targets. Results of three studies, a correlational study ( = 563), a laboratory experiment ( = 85), and an online scenario experiment ( = 597), showed that being the target of negative gossip reduced social inclusion and indirectly decreased OCBs. Our multi-method approach bridges findings from research conducted in organizations and in laboratory experiments and offers a more nuanced understanding of the effects of negative gossip on targets' behavior. We show that due to its detrimental effect on targets' social inclusion, negative gossip may not be as effective for enabling sustainable cooperation as experimental studies claim it to be.
大量实验证据表明,负面八卦通过增加个体对声誉的关注来促进群体中的合作。然而,最近的实地研究表明,负面八卦会降低其目标对象(即被八卦的人)的组织公民行为(OCB)。为了弥合这些研究结果,我们研究了社会包容在解释负面八卦如何影响目标对象参与组织公民行为方面的作用。基于社会交换理论,我们预测负面八卦的目标对象会体验到较低的社会包容度。反过来,我们提出低社会包容度会导致八卦目标对象的组织公民行为水平较低。三项研究的结果,一项相关性研究(N = 563)、一项实验室实验(N = 85)和一项在线情景实验(N = 597)表明,成为负面八卦的目标会降低社会包容度,并间接减少组织公民行为。我们的多方法研究方法弥合了在组织和实验室实验中进行的研究结果,并对负面八卦对目标对象行为的影响提供了更细致入微的理解。我们表明,由于负面八卦对目标对象的社会包容度有不利影响,它可能不像实验研究所声称的那样对促进可持续合作有效。