• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负面八卦通过减少社会包容来降低目标对象的组织公民行为。一种多方法研究途径。

Negative Gossip Decreases Targets' Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Decreasing Social Inclusion. A Multi-Method Approach.

作者信息

Martinescu Elena, Jansen Wiebren, Beersma Bianca

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Group Organ Manag. 2021 Jun;46(3):463-497. doi: 10.1177/1059601120986876. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1177/1059601120986876
PMID:34040333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8127659/
Abstract

Ample experimental evidence shows that negative gossip fosters cooperation in groups by increasing individuals' reputational concerns. However, recent field studies showed that negative gossip decreases organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) among its targets (i.e., people whom gossip is about). Bridging these findings, we study the role of social inclusion in explaining how negative gossip affects targets' engagement in OCB. Based on social exchange theory, we predict that targets of negative gossip experience low social inclusion. In turn, we propose that low social inclusion leads to low OCB of gossip targets. Results of three studies, a correlational study ( = 563), a laboratory experiment ( = 85), and an online scenario experiment ( = 597), showed that being the target of negative gossip reduced social inclusion and indirectly decreased OCBs. Our multi-method approach bridges findings from research conducted in organizations and in laboratory experiments and offers a more nuanced understanding of the effects of negative gossip on targets' behavior. We show that due to its detrimental effect on targets' social inclusion, negative gossip may not be as effective for enabling sustainable cooperation as experimental studies claim it to be.

摘要

大量实验证据表明,负面八卦通过增加个体对声誉的关注来促进群体中的合作。然而,最近的实地研究表明,负面八卦会降低其目标对象(即被八卦的人)的组织公民行为(OCB)。为了弥合这些研究结果,我们研究了社会包容在解释负面八卦如何影响目标对象参与组织公民行为方面的作用。基于社会交换理论,我们预测负面八卦的目标对象会体验到较低的社会包容度。反过来,我们提出低社会包容度会导致八卦目标对象的组织公民行为水平较低。三项研究的结果,一项相关性研究(N = 563)、一项实验室实验(N = 85)和一项在线情景实验(N = 597)表明,成为负面八卦的目标会降低社会包容度,并间接减少组织公民行为。我们的多方法研究方法弥合了在组织和实验室实验中进行的研究结果,并对负面八卦对目标对象行为的影响提供了更细致入微的理解。我们表明,由于负面八卦对目标对象的社会包容度有不利影响,它可能不像实验研究所声称的那样对促进可持续合作有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/8127659/dd61c366095f/10.1177_1059601120986876-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/8127659/42d0618e4867/10.1177_1059601120986876-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/8127659/012a3a52df33/10.1177_1059601120986876-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/8127659/dd61c366095f/10.1177_1059601120986876-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/8127659/42d0618e4867/10.1177_1059601120986876-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/8127659/012a3a52df33/10.1177_1059601120986876-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/8127659/dd61c366095f/10.1177_1059601120986876-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Negative Gossip Decreases Targets' Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Decreasing Social Inclusion. A Multi-Method Approach.负面八卦通过减少社会包容来降低目标对象的组织公民行为。一种多方法研究途径。
Group Organ Manag. 2021 Jun;46(3):463-497. doi: 10.1177/1059601120986876. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
2
Effect of Perceived Negative Workplace Gossip on Employees' Behaviors.感知到的负面职场流言蜚语对员工行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 12;9:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01112. eCollection 2018.
3
Self-Evaluative and Other-Directed Emotional and Behavioral Responses to Gossip About the Self.对关于自己的流言蜚语的自我评估及指向他人的情绪和行为反应。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;9:2603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02603. eCollection 2018.
4
Gossip and reputation in everyday life.日常生活中的流言蜚语和名誉。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0301. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Gossip promotes cooperation only when it is pro-socially motivated.当八卦是出于亲社会动机时,它才会促进合作。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 21;12(1):4790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08670-7.
6
Do not ask, but you shall still receive: Newcomer reactions to receiving negative gossip.无需询问,你仍会有所收获:新人对收到负面八卦的反应。
Stress Health. 2022 Dec;38(5):989-1000. doi: 10.1002/smi.3150. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
When do gossip receivers assess negative gossip as justifiable? A goal framing approach.当八卦接收者将负面八卦评估为合理时,他们会怎么做?一种目标框架方法。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jul;247:104327. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104327. Epub 2024 May 27.
8
Evaluating mechanisms that could support credible reputations and cooperation: cross-checking and social bonding.评估能够支持可信声誉和合作的机制:交叉检查和社会联系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200302. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0302. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip.恶劣与高尚并存:相互依存结构驱动自利八卦。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Nov;50(11):1596-1612. doi: 10.1177/01461672231171054. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
Competitive gossip: the impact of domain, resource value, resource scarcity and coalitions.竞争八卦:领域、资源价值、资源稀缺性和联盟的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0305. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Openness to Being Gossiped About: Understanding Gossip from the Target's Perspective.对被人说闲话持开放态度:从被说闲话者的角度理解闲话。
Self Identity. 2025;24(3):253-279. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2025.2467737. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
Positive Gossip Fuels Creativity: The Roles of Cognitive Crafting and Risk Taking.积极的流言蜚语激发创造力:认知加工与冒险的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 24;15(6):727. doi: 10.3390/bs15060727.
3
Workplace gossip erodes proactive work behavior: anxiety and neuroticism as underlying mechanisms.职场八卦会削弱员工的主动工作行为:焦虑和神经质是潜在机制。

本文引用的文献

1
Gossip and reputation in everyday life.日常生活中的流言蜚语和名誉。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0301. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
2
Self-Evaluative and Other-Directed Emotional and Behavioral Responses to Gossip About the Self.对关于自己的流言蜚语的自我评估及指向他人的情绪和行为反应。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;9:2603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02603. eCollection 2018.
3
Effect of Perceived Negative Workplace Gossip on Employees' Behaviors.感知到的负面职场流言蜚语对员工行为的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 31;12(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01966-5.
4
From the dual-dimensional perspective of employee mindfulness and superior trust, explore the influence mechanism of negative workplace gossip on work engagement.从员工正念和上级信任的双维度视角出发,探究职场负面八卦对工作投入的影响机制。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 24;14:1287217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1287217. eCollection 2023.
5
Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip.恶劣与高尚并存:相互依存结构驱动自利八卦。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Nov;50(11):1596-1612. doi: 10.1177/01461672231171054. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Why does subordinates' negative workplace gossip lead to supervisor undermining? A moderated mediation model.为什么下属的负面职场八卦会导致上级受到伤害?一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:981539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.981539. eCollection 2022.
7
Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.充当中间人还是两面不讨好?关于职场流言蜚语的群体视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:815383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383. eCollection 2022.
8
Dealing With Negative Workplace Gossip: From the Perspective of Face.从面子的角度看应对职场负面流言蜚语的问题
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:629376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629376. eCollection 2021.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 12;9:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01112. eCollection 2018.
4
Trash-Talking and Trolling.说脏话和恶意挑衅。
Hum Nat. 2018 Sep;29(3):353-369. doi: 10.1007/s12110-018-9317-3.
5
Gossiping About Deviance: Evidence That Deviance Spurs the Gossip That Builds Bonds.八卦越轨行为:越轨行为引发八卦从而建立联系的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1610-1619. doi: 10.1177/0956797617716918. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
6
Gossip Versus Punishment: The Efficiency of Reputation to Promote and Maintain Cooperation.流言蜚语与惩罚:声誉在促进和维持合作方面的有效性
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 4;6:23919. doi: 10.1038/srep23919.
7
Human conversational behavior.人类对话行为。
Hum Nat. 1997 Sep;8(3):231-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02912493.
8
Utilities of gossip across organizational levels : Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams.跨组织层级的流言效用:多层次选择、搭便车者与团队
Hum Nat. 2005 Sep;16(3):278-92. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6.
9
Tell me the gossip: the self-evaluative function of receiving gossip about others.告诉我八卦内容:接收关于他人的八卦的自我评估功能。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Dec;40(12):1668-80. doi: 10.1177/0146167214554916. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
10
Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups.流言蜚语和排斥会促进群体合作。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;25(3):656-64. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510184. Epub 2014 Jan 24.