• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常生活中的流言蜚语和名誉。

Gossip and reputation in everyday life.

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam (IBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081BT, The Netherlands.

Department of Organization Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081HV, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0301. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2020.0301
PMID:34601907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8487731/
Abstract

Gossip-a sender communicating to a receiver about an absent third party-is hypothesized to impact reputation formation, partner selection, and cooperation. Laboratory experiments have found that people gossip about others' cooperativeness and that they use gossip to condition their cooperation. Here, we move beyond the laboratory and test several predictions from theories of indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner selection about the content of everyday gossip and how people use it to update the reputation of others in their social network. In a Dutch community sample ( = 309), we sampled daily events in which people either sent or received gossip about a target over 10 days ( = 5284). Gossip senders frequently shared information about targets' cooperativeness and did so in ways that minimize potential retaliation from targets. Receivers overwhelmingly believed gossip to be true and updated their evaluation of targets based on gossip. In turn, a positive shift in the evaluation of a target was associated with higher intentions to help them in future interactions, and with lower intentions to avoid them in the future. Thus, gossip is used in daily life to impact and update reputations in a way that enables partner selection and indirect reciprocity. This article is part of the theme issue 'The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling'.

摘要

八卦——发送者向接收者传达关于不在场的第三方的信息——被假设会影响声誉的形成、伴侣的选择和合作。实验室实验发现,人们会八卦别人的合作意愿,也会利用八卦来调整自己的合作意愿。在这里,我们超越了实验室,测试了间接互惠和基于声誉的伴侣选择理论的几个预测,这些预测涉及日常八卦的内容,以及人们如何利用它来更新社交网络中他人的声誉。在一个荷兰社区样本中(n=309),我们在 10 天内(n=5284)抽样了人们发送或接收关于目标的八卦的日常事件。八卦发送者经常分享有关目标合作意愿的信息,并且以尽量减少来自目标潜在报复的方式分享。接收者压倒性地认为八卦是真实的,并根据八卦更新了对目标的评价。反过来,目标评价的积极转变与未来互动中帮助他们的意愿较高有关,与未来避免与他们互动的意愿较低有关。因此,八卦在日常生活中被用来影响和更新声誉,从而促进伴侣的选择和间接互惠。本文是主题为“合作的语言:声誉和诚实信号”的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b883/8487731/d43d7a7bbe7d/rstb20200301f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b883/8487731/01b3d207fc7b/rstb20200301f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b883/8487731/06eb715aec1e/rstb20200301f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b883/8487731/d43d7a7bbe7d/rstb20200301f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b883/8487731/01b3d207fc7b/rstb20200301f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b883/8487731/06eb715aec1e/rstb20200301f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b883/8487731/d43d7a7bbe7d/rstb20200301f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Gossip and reputation in everyday life.日常生活中的流言蜚语和名誉。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0301. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
2
The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling.合作的语言:声誉与诚实信号。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200286. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0286. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
Evaluating mechanisms that could support credible reputations and cooperation: cross-checking and social bonding.评估能够支持可信声誉和合作的机制:交叉检查和社会联系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200302. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0302. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Four Puzzles of Reputation-Based Cooperation : Content, Process, Honesty, and Structure.基于声誉的合作的四个谜题:内容、过程、诚实和结构。
Hum Nat. 2022 Mar;33(1):43-61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09419-3. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
5
The benefits of being seen to help others: indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner choice.被视为帮助他人的好处:间接互惠和基于声誉的伴侣选择。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200290. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0290. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Direct punishment and indirect reputation-based tactics to intervene against offences.直接惩罚和间接基于声誉的策略来干预犯罪。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200289. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0289. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Gossip and competitive altruism support cooperation in a Public Good game.流言蜚语和竞争利他主义支持公共物品博弈中的合作。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200303. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0303. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Competitive gossip: the impact of domain, resource value, resource scarcity and coalitions.竞争八卦:领域、资源价值、资源稀缺性和联盟的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0305. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Honesty and dishonesty in gossip strategies: a fitness interdependence analysis.闲话策略中的诚实与不诚实:适合度相互依存分析。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200300. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0300. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
A mechanistic model of gossip, reputations, and cooperation.谣言、声誉和合作的机械模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 14;121(20):e2400689121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400689121. Epub 2024 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The contingent effects of supervisor positive gossip on employee receivers: the moderating role of performance goal orientation.上级积极八卦对员工接收者的偶然影响:绩效目标导向的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 19;16:1516309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1516309. eCollection 2025.
2
Openness to Being Gossiped About: Understanding Gossip from the Target's Perspective.对被人说闲话持开放态度:从被说闲话者的角度理解闲话。
Self Identity. 2025;24(3):253-279. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2025.2467737. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Fake news, real war.假新闻,真战争。

本文引用的文献

1
Punishment: one tool, many uses.惩罚:一种工具,多种用途。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Nov 12;1:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.12. eCollection 2019.
2
The psychological foundations of reputation-based cooperation.基于声誉的合作的心理学基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200287. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0287. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
The content and structure of reputation domains across human societies: a view from the evolutionary social sciences.人类社会中声誉领域的内容和结构:来自进化社会科学的观点。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 11;3(1):104. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00267-w.
4
Ethics trumps resources in women's and men's evaluations of potential mates and competitors.在男性和女性对潜在伴侣及竞争对手的评价中,道德胜过资源。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06611-8.
5
A mechanistic model of gossip, reputations, and cooperation.谣言、声誉和合作的机械模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 14;121(20):e2400689121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400689121. Epub 2024 May 8.
6
Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip.恶劣与高尚并存:相互依存结构驱动自利八卦。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Nov;50(11):1596-1612. doi: 10.1177/01461672231171054. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.充当中间人还是两面不讨好?关于职场流言蜚语的群体视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:815383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383. eCollection 2022.
8
How 'who someone is' and 'what they did' influences gossiping about them.“某人是谁”和“他们做了什么”如何影响对他们的八卦。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0269812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269812. eCollection 2022.
9
Gossip promotes cooperation only when it is pro-socially motivated.当八卦是出于亲社会动机时,它才会促进合作。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 21;12(1):4790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08670-7.
10
Four Puzzles of Reputation-Based Cooperation : Content, Process, Honesty, and Structure.基于声誉的合作的四个谜题:内容、过程、诚实和结构。
Hum Nat. 2022 Mar;33(1):43-61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09419-3. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200296. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0296. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Competitive gossip: the impact of domain, resource value, resource scarcity and coalitions.竞争八卦:领域、资源价值、资源稀缺性和联盟的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0305. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Is it costly to deceive? People are adept at detecting gossipers' lies but may not reward honesty.欺骗代价高昂吗?人们善于识破八卦者的谎言,但却不一定奖励诚实。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200304. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0304. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Gossip and competitive altruism support cooperation in a Public Good game.流言蜚语和竞争利他主义支持公共物品博弈中的合作。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200303. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0303. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Evaluating mechanisms that could support credible reputations and cooperation: cross-checking and social bonding.评估能够支持可信声誉和合作的机制:交叉检查和社会联系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200302. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0302. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Direct punishment and indirect reputation-based tactics to intervene against offences.直接惩罚和间接基于声誉的策略来干预犯罪。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200289. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0289. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?社会知觉的价-域模型适用于哪些世界区域?
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):159-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life.日常生活中规范违规的直接和间接惩罚。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 9;11(1):3432. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17286-2.