Mary Nicolas, Iannuccelli Nathalie, Petit Geoffrey, Bonnet Nathalie, Pinton Alain, Barasc Harmonie, Faure Amélie, Calgaro Anne, Grosbois Vladimir, Servin Bertrand, Ducos Alain, Riquet Juliette
GenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE Montpellier France.
Evol Appl. 2022 Jul 2;15(7):1115-1128. doi: 10.1111/eva.13432. eCollection 2022 Jul.
The admixture of domestic pig into French wild boar populations has been monitored since the 1980s thanks to the existence of a cytogenetic difference between the two sub-species. The number of chromosomes is 2 = 36 in wild boar and 2 = 38 in pig, respectively. This difference makes it possible to assign the "hybrid" status to wild boar individuals controlled with 37 or 38 chromosomes. However, it does not make it possible to determine the timing of the hybridization(s), nor to guarantee the absence of domestic admixture in an animal with 2 = 36 chromosomes. In order to analyze hybridization in greater detail and to avoid the inherent limitations of the cytogenetic approach, 362 wild boars (WB) recently collected in different French geographical areas and in different environments (farms, free ranging in protected or unprotected areas, animals with 2 = 36, 37 or 38 chromosomes) were genotyped on a 70K SNP chip. Principal component analyses allowed the identification of 13 "outliers" (3.6%), for which the proportion of the genome of "domestic" origin was greater than 40% (Admixture analyses). These animals were probably recent hybrids, having Asian domestic pig ancestry for most of them. For the remaining 349 animals studied, the proportion of the genome of "wild" origin varied between 83% and 100% (median: 94%). This proportion varied significantly depending on how the wild boar populations were managed. Local ancestry analyses revealed adaptive introgression from domestic pig, suggesting a critical role of genetic admixture in improving the fitness and population growth of WB. Overall, our results show that the methods used to monitor the domestic genetic contributions to wild boar populations should evolve in order to limit the level of admixture between the two gene pools.
自20世纪80年代以来,由于家猪和法国野猪种群之间存在细胞遗传学差异,家猪混入野猪种群的情况一直受到监测。野猪的染色体数目为2n = 36,家猪的染色体数目为2n = 38。这种差异使得可以将染色体数目为37或38的野猪个体判定为“杂交”状态。然而,这无法确定杂交发生的时间,也不能保证染色体数目为2n = 36的动物没有家猪血统混入。为了更详细地分析杂交情况并避免细胞遗传学方法固有的局限性,对最近在法国不同地理区域和不同环境(农场、保护区或非保护区自由放养、染色体数目为2n = 36、37或38的动物)收集的362头野猪进行了70K SNP芯片基因分型。主成分分析识别出了13头“异常值”个体(占3.6%),其“家猪”起源的基因组比例大于40%(混合分析)。这些动物可能是近期的杂交种,其中大多数具有亚洲家猪的血统。对于其余349头研究动物,“野猪”起源的基因组比例在83%至100%之间(中位数:94%)。这一比例因野猪种群的管理方式而异。局部祖先分析揭示了家猪的适应性基因渗入,表明基因混合在提高野猪的适应性和种群增长方面发挥了关键作用。总体而言,我们的结果表明,用于监测家猪对野猪种群基因贡献的方法应不断改进,以限制两个基因库之间的混合水平。