Suppr超能文献

成人癌症患者的简易营养评估:系统评价与Meta分析

Mini Nutritional Assessment for Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Pengpeng, Jiang Li, Soh Kim Lam, Ying Yanping, Liu Yuanhang, Huang Xueling, Tan Yanmei, Soh Kim Geok

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Serdang, Malaysia.

Nursing College of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Nutr Cancer. 2023;75(1):61-72. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2104877. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Abstract

Early assessment of malnutrition in cancer patients is very important. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is often used to assess malnutrition in adult cancer patients. However, the diagnostic values of MNA are controversial. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic values of MNA in assessing malnutrition in adult cancer patients. A systematic search was performed using Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP). Studies comparing MNA with other tools or criteria in cancer patients were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using Stata 17.0 and Meta-DiSc1.4. In addition, sensitivity, subgroup, meta-regression, and publication bias analyses were conducted. In total, 11 studies involving 1367 patients involving MNA were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, ROC, and DOR were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63-0.69), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87), and 16.11 (95% CI: 7.16-36.27), respectively. In the assessment of malnutrition in adult cancer patients, MNA has high sensitivity and moderate specificity.

摘要

癌症患者营养不良的早期评估非常重要。微型营养评定法(MNA)常用于评估成年癌症患者的营养不良情况。然而,MNA的诊断价值存在争议。我们旨在分析MNA在评估成年癌症患者营养不良方面的诊断价值。通过检索Embase、科学网、PubMed、考克兰图书馆、中国知网、万方数据库和维普资讯网进行系统搜索。纳入比较MNA与其他工具或标准在癌症患者中的研究。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)对纳入研究的质量进行评估。使用Stata 17.0和Meta-DiSc1.4计算合并敏感度、特异度、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和诊断比值比(DOR)。此外,还进行了敏感度、亚组、Meta回归和发表偏倚分析。总共纳入了11项涉及1367例使用MNA患者的研究。合并敏感度、特异度、ROC和DOR分别为0.84(95%CI:0.81-0.87)、0.66(95%CI:0.63-0.69)、0.84(95%CI:0.81-0.87)和16.11(95%CI:7.16-36.27)。在评估成年癌症患者的营养不良时,MNA具有较高的敏感度和中等的特异度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验