Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Department of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Epileptic Disord. 2022 Oct 1;24(5):899-905. doi: 10.1684/epd.2022.1472.
The current International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) guidelines classify focal seizures based on awareness, defined as successful postictal recall of ictal experiences, and exclude the use of responsiveness during seizures for classification. One reason for this exclusion is that responsiveness was thought to not be commonly tested during seizures. Our goal was to determine whether, in at least some settings, responsiveness testing during seizures is relatively common.
We assessed how often responsiveness and recall were each evaluated in patients with focal epilepsy undergoing surface and intracranial EEG-video monitoring. We performed this evaluation by retrospectively reviewing video recordings from 121 seizures from 48 patients during their stay in the epilepsy monitoring unit between September 2012 and November 2019.
We found that responsiveness during seizures was tested more frequently than recall of ictal events after seizures. Of 121 seizures in 48 patients, responsiveness was tested in 101 seizures, whereas recall was tested in only 38.
Evaluating if consciousness is impaired during seizures is of critical importance for guiding recommendations for people with epilepsy, such as whether it is safe for them to drive or operate machinery. The ILAE classification guidelines are intended to be broadly useful, but our findings demonstrate that at least in one important clinical setting, responsiveness was used more commonly than recall to evaluate patients during focal seizures. Although our preliminary findings should be replicated in a larger sample and in other patient groups, they suggest that responsiveness testing during focal seizures might be relatively common in at least some clinical practice settings. With further study, this may lead to a re-evaluation of criteria for classifying focal seizures to include both responsiveness and recall of experiences during seizures, as both may provide important information to guide clinical care.
目前的国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)指南根据意识对局灶性发作进行分类,定义为成功回忆发作期间的体验,且不将发作期间的反应性用于分类。排除使用反应性的原因之一是,人们认为在发作期间通常不会测试反应性。我们的目标是确定在至少某些情况下,发作期间测试反应性是否相对常见。
我们评估了在接受表面和颅内 EEG-视频监测的局灶性癫痫患者中,每次评估反应性和回忆的频率。我们通过回顾 2012 年 9 月至 2019 年 11 月期间在癫痫监测单元住院的 48 名患者的 121 次发作的视频记录来进行此评估。
我们发现,发作期间测试反应性比发作后测试对发作事件的回忆更频繁。在 48 名患者的 121 次发作中,有 101 次测试了反应性,而只有 38 次测试了回忆性。
评估发作期间意识是否受损对于指导癫痫患者的建议非常重要,例如他们是否可以安全驾驶或操作机器。ILAE 分类指南旨在广泛应用,但我们的发现表明,至少在一个重要的临床环境中,在评估局灶性发作患者时,使用反应性比回忆更常见。尽管我们的初步发现需要在更大的样本和其他患者群体中得到复制,但它们表明在至少某些临床实践环境中,发作期间的反应性测试可能相对常见。随着进一步的研究,这可能会导致重新评估分类局灶性发作的标准,包括发作期间的反应性和对体验的回忆,因为两者都可能为指导临床护理提供重要信息。